Cargando…

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Modern linear accelerators are equipped with cone beam computed tomography and robotic couches that can correct for errors in the translational (X, Y, Z) and rotational (α, β, γ) axes prior to treatment delivery. Here, we compared the positional accuracy of 2 cone beam registration approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kung, Joseph S., Tran, William T., Poon, Ian, Atenafu, Eshetu G., Courneyea, Lorraine, Higgins, Kevin, Enepekides, Danny, Sahgal, Arjun, Chin, Lee, Karam, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033819853824
_version_ 1783421614806794240
author Kung, Joseph S.
Tran, William T.
Poon, Ian
Atenafu, Eshetu G.
Courneyea, Lorraine
Higgins, Kevin
Enepekides, Danny
Sahgal, Arjun
Chin, Lee
Karam, Irene
author_facet Kung, Joseph S.
Tran, William T.
Poon, Ian
Atenafu, Eshetu G.
Courneyea, Lorraine
Higgins, Kevin
Enepekides, Danny
Sahgal, Arjun
Chin, Lee
Karam, Irene
author_sort Kung, Joseph S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Modern linear accelerators are equipped with cone beam computed tomography and robotic couches that can correct for errors in the translational (X, Y, Z) and rotational (α, β, γ) axes prior to treatment delivery. Here, we compared the positional accuracy of 2 cone beam registration approaches: (1) employing translational shifts only in 3 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z), versus; (2) using translational-rotational shifts in 6 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z, α, β, γ). METHODS: This retrospective study examined 140 interfraction cone beam images from 20 patients with head and neck cancer treated with standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The cone beam images were matched to planning simulation scans in 3, then in 6 degrees of freedom, using the mandible, clivus, and C2 and C7 vertebrae as surrogate volumes. Statistical analyses included a generalized mixed model and was used to assess whether there were significant differences in acceptable registrations between the 2 correction methods. RESULTS: The rates of improvement with corrections in 6 degrees of freedom for the mandible with a 5-mm expansion margin were 54.55% (P = .793), for the clivus 85.71% (P = .222), and for C7 87.50% (P = .015). There was a 100% increase in acceptability for the C2 vertebra within the 5-mm margin (P < .001). For the 3-mm expansion margin, the rates of improvement for the mandible, clivus, C2, and C7 were 63.16% (P = .070), 91.30% (P = .011), 84.21% (P = .027), and 76.92% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant registration improvements with the use of rotational corrections with a 5-mm expansion margin are only seen in the C7 vertebra. At the 3-mm margin, significant improvements are found for the C2, C7, and clivus registrations, suggesting that intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments for head and neck cancers with 3-mm planning target volume margins may benefit from corrections in 6 degrees of freedom.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6535727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65357272019-06-14 Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy Kung, Joseph S. Tran, William T. Poon, Ian Atenafu, Eshetu G. Courneyea, Lorraine Higgins, Kevin Enepekides, Danny Sahgal, Arjun Chin, Lee Karam, Irene Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Modern linear accelerators are equipped with cone beam computed tomography and robotic couches that can correct for errors in the translational (X, Y, Z) and rotational (α, β, γ) axes prior to treatment delivery. Here, we compared the positional accuracy of 2 cone beam registration approaches: (1) employing translational shifts only in 3 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z), versus; (2) using translational-rotational shifts in 6 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z, α, β, γ). METHODS: This retrospective study examined 140 interfraction cone beam images from 20 patients with head and neck cancer treated with standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The cone beam images were matched to planning simulation scans in 3, then in 6 degrees of freedom, using the mandible, clivus, and C2 and C7 vertebrae as surrogate volumes. Statistical analyses included a generalized mixed model and was used to assess whether there were significant differences in acceptable registrations between the 2 correction methods. RESULTS: The rates of improvement with corrections in 6 degrees of freedom for the mandible with a 5-mm expansion margin were 54.55% (P = .793), for the clivus 85.71% (P = .222), and for C7 87.50% (P = .015). There was a 100% increase in acceptability for the C2 vertebra within the 5-mm margin (P < .001). For the 3-mm expansion margin, the rates of improvement for the mandible, clivus, C2, and C7 were 63.16% (P = .070), 91.30% (P = .011), 84.21% (P = .027), and 76.92% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant registration improvements with the use of rotational corrections with a 5-mm expansion margin are only seen in the C7 vertebra. At the 3-mm margin, significant improvements are found for the C2, C7, and clivus registrations, suggesting that intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments for head and neck cancers with 3-mm planning target volume margins may benefit from corrections in 6 degrees of freedom. SAGE Publications 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6535727/ /pubmed/31122178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033819853824 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kung, Joseph S.
Tran, William T.
Poon, Ian
Atenafu, Eshetu G.
Courneyea, Lorraine
Higgins, Kevin
Enepekides, Danny
Sahgal, Arjun
Chin, Lee
Karam, Irene
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy
title Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of rotational corrections for standard-fractionation head and neck image-guided radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033819853824
work_keys_str_mv AT kungjosephs evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT tranwilliamt evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT poonian evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT atenafueshetug evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT courneyealorraine evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT higginskevin evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT enepekidesdanny evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT sahgalarjun evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT chinlee evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy
AT karamirene evaluationoftheefficacyofrotationalcorrectionsforstandardfractionationheadandneckimageguidedradiotherapy