Cargando…

Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management

Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. However, the use of revascularization is widespread. We addressed the effectiveness of preventing (additional) invasive revascularization after primary SET or revascularization based on lesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouwens, Elke, Klaphake, Sanne, Weststrate, Karin J, Teijink, Joep AW, Verhagen, Hence JM, Hoeks, Sanne E, Rouwet, Ellen V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18821175
_version_ 1783421637602836480
author Bouwens, Elke
Klaphake, Sanne
Weststrate, Karin J
Teijink, Joep AW
Verhagen, Hence JM
Hoeks, Sanne E
Rouwet, Ellen V
author_facet Bouwens, Elke
Klaphake, Sanne
Weststrate, Karin J
Teijink, Joep AW
Verhagen, Hence JM
Hoeks, Sanne E
Rouwet, Ellen V
author_sort Bouwens, Elke
collection PubMed
description Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. However, the use of revascularization is widespread. We addressed the effectiveness of preventing (additional) invasive revascularization after primary SET or revascularization based on lesion and patient characteristics. In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, 474 patients with intermittent claudication were included. Patients with occlusive disease of the aortoiliac tract and/or common femoral artery (inflow) were primarily considered for revascularization, while patients with more distal disease (outflow) were primarily considered for SET. In total, 232 patients were referred for SET and 242 patients received revascularization. The primary outcome was freedom from (additional) intervention, analyzed by Kaplan–Meier estimates. Secondary outcomes were survival, critical ischemia, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), and an increase in maximum walking distance. In the SET-first strategy, 71% of patients had significant outflow lesions. Freedom from intervention was 0.90 ± 0.02 at 1-year and 0.82 ± 0.03 at 2-year follow-up. In the primary revascularization group, 90% of patients had inflow lesions. Freedom from additional intervention was 0.78 ± 0.03 at 1-year and only 0.65 ± 0.04 at 2-year follow-up, despite freedom from TLR of 0.91 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.03 at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. In conclusion, SET was effective in preventing invasive treatment for patients with mainly outflow lesions. In contrast, secondary intervention rates following our strategy of primary revascularization for inflow lesions were unexpectedly high. These findings further support the guideline recommendations of SET as first-line treatment for all patients with intermittent claudication irrespective of level of disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6535809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65358092019-06-25 Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management Bouwens, Elke Klaphake, Sanne Weststrate, Karin J Teijink, Joep AW Verhagen, Hence JM Hoeks, Sanne E Rouwet, Ellen V Vasc Med Original Articles Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. However, the use of revascularization is widespread. We addressed the effectiveness of preventing (additional) invasive revascularization after primary SET or revascularization based on lesion and patient characteristics. In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, 474 patients with intermittent claudication were included. Patients with occlusive disease of the aortoiliac tract and/or common femoral artery (inflow) were primarily considered for revascularization, while patients with more distal disease (outflow) were primarily considered for SET. In total, 232 patients were referred for SET and 242 patients received revascularization. The primary outcome was freedom from (additional) intervention, analyzed by Kaplan–Meier estimates. Secondary outcomes were survival, critical ischemia, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), and an increase in maximum walking distance. In the SET-first strategy, 71% of patients had significant outflow lesions. Freedom from intervention was 0.90 ± 0.02 at 1-year and 0.82 ± 0.03 at 2-year follow-up. In the primary revascularization group, 90% of patients had inflow lesions. Freedom from additional intervention was 0.78 ± 0.03 at 1-year and only 0.65 ± 0.04 at 2-year follow-up, despite freedom from TLR of 0.91 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.03 at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. In conclusion, SET was effective in preventing invasive treatment for patients with mainly outflow lesions. In contrast, secondary intervention rates following our strategy of primary revascularization for inflow lesions were unexpectedly high. These findings further support the guideline recommendations of SET as first-line treatment for all patients with intermittent claudication irrespective of level of disease. SAGE Publications 2019-02-22 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6535809/ /pubmed/30795714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18821175 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bouwens, Elke
Klaphake, Sanne
Weststrate, Karin J
Teijink, Joep AW
Verhagen, Hence JM
Hoeks, Sanne E
Rouwet, Ellen V
Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
title Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
title_full Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
title_fullStr Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
title_full_unstemmed Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
title_short Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
title_sort supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18821175
work_keys_str_mv AT bouwenselke supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement
AT klaphakesanne supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement
AT weststratekarinj supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement
AT teijinkjoepaw supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement
AT verhagenhencejm supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement
AT hoekssannee supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement
AT rouwetellenv supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement