Cargando…
Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management
Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. However, the use of revascularization is widespread. We addressed the effectiveness of preventing (additional) invasive revascularization after primary SET or revascularization based on lesi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18821175 |
_version_ | 1783421637602836480 |
---|---|
author | Bouwens, Elke Klaphake, Sanne Weststrate, Karin J Teijink, Joep AW Verhagen, Hence JM Hoeks, Sanne E Rouwet, Ellen V |
author_facet | Bouwens, Elke Klaphake, Sanne Weststrate, Karin J Teijink, Joep AW Verhagen, Hence JM Hoeks, Sanne E Rouwet, Ellen V |
author_sort | Bouwens, Elke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. However, the use of revascularization is widespread. We addressed the effectiveness of preventing (additional) invasive revascularization after primary SET or revascularization based on lesion and patient characteristics. In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, 474 patients with intermittent claudication were included. Patients with occlusive disease of the aortoiliac tract and/or common femoral artery (inflow) were primarily considered for revascularization, while patients with more distal disease (outflow) were primarily considered for SET. In total, 232 patients were referred for SET and 242 patients received revascularization. The primary outcome was freedom from (additional) intervention, analyzed by Kaplan–Meier estimates. Secondary outcomes were survival, critical ischemia, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), and an increase in maximum walking distance. In the SET-first strategy, 71% of patients had significant outflow lesions. Freedom from intervention was 0.90 ± 0.02 at 1-year and 0.82 ± 0.03 at 2-year follow-up. In the primary revascularization group, 90% of patients had inflow lesions. Freedom from additional intervention was 0.78 ± 0.03 at 1-year and only 0.65 ± 0.04 at 2-year follow-up, despite freedom from TLR of 0.91 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.03 at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. In conclusion, SET was effective in preventing invasive treatment for patients with mainly outflow lesions. In contrast, secondary intervention rates following our strategy of primary revascularization for inflow lesions were unexpectedly high. These findings further support the guideline recommendations of SET as first-line treatment for all patients with intermittent claudication irrespective of level of disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6535809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65358092019-06-25 Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management Bouwens, Elke Klaphake, Sanne Weststrate, Karin J Teijink, Joep AW Verhagen, Hence JM Hoeks, Sanne E Rouwet, Ellen V Vasc Med Original Articles Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. However, the use of revascularization is widespread. We addressed the effectiveness of preventing (additional) invasive revascularization after primary SET or revascularization based on lesion and patient characteristics. In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, 474 patients with intermittent claudication were included. Patients with occlusive disease of the aortoiliac tract and/or common femoral artery (inflow) were primarily considered for revascularization, while patients with more distal disease (outflow) were primarily considered for SET. In total, 232 patients were referred for SET and 242 patients received revascularization. The primary outcome was freedom from (additional) intervention, analyzed by Kaplan–Meier estimates. Secondary outcomes were survival, critical ischemia, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), and an increase in maximum walking distance. In the SET-first strategy, 71% of patients had significant outflow lesions. Freedom from intervention was 0.90 ± 0.02 at 1-year and 0.82 ± 0.03 at 2-year follow-up. In the primary revascularization group, 90% of patients had inflow lesions. Freedom from additional intervention was 0.78 ± 0.03 at 1-year and only 0.65 ± 0.04 at 2-year follow-up, despite freedom from TLR of 0.91 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.03 at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. In conclusion, SET was effective in preventing invasive treatment for patients with mainly outflow lesions. In contrast, secondary intervention rates following our strategy of primary revascularization for inflow lesions were unexpectedly high. These findings further support the guideline recommendations of SET as first-line treatment for all patients with intermittent claudication irrespective of level of disease. SAGE Publications 2019-02-22 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6535809/ /pubmed/30795714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18821175 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bouwens, Elke Klaphake, Sanne Weststrate, Karin J Teijink, Joep AW Verhagen, Hence JM Hoeks, Sanne E Rouwet, Ellen V Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management |
title | Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management |
title_full | Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management |
title_fullStr | Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management |
title_full_unstemmed | Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management |
title_short | Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management |
title_sort | supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: single-center experience of intermittent claudication management |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18821175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bouwenselke supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement AT klaphakesanne supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement AT weststratekarinj supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement AT teijinkjoepaw supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement AT verhagenhencejm supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement AT hoekssannee supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement AT rouwetellenv supervisedexercisetherapyandrevascularizationsinglecenterexperienceofintermittentclaudicationmanagement |