Cargando…
Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice
BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of early detection and treatment of allograft rejection is well-established. Despite frequent testing called for by standard of care protocols, the five-year kidney allograft survival rate is estimated to be as low as 71%. Herein, we report on posttransplant care pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5303284 |
_version_ | 1783421645110640640 |
---|---|
author | Peabody, John Billings, Paul Valdenor, Czarlota Demko, Zach Moshkevich, Solomon Paculdo, David Tran, Mary |
author_facet | Peabody, John Billings, Paul Valdenor, Czarlota Demko, Zach Moshkevich, Solomon Paculdo, David Tran, Mary |
author_sort | Peabody, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of early detection and treatment of allograft rejection is well-established. Despite frequent testing called for by standard of care protocols, the five-year kidney allograft survival rate is estimated to be as low as 71%. Herein, we report on posttransplant care provided to kidney allograft recipients by board-certified nephrologists in the United States. METHODS: We measured clinical practice in a representative sample of 175 practicing nephrologists. All providers cared for simulated patients' status after renal transplant ranging from 30-75 years in age and 3-24 months after transplant. Our sample of nephrologists cared for a total of 525 allograft cases. Provider responses to the cases were reviewed by trained clinicians, and care was compared to evidence-based care standards and accepted standard of care protocols. RESULTS: Among nephrologists, practicing in settings ranging from transplant centers to community practice, we found that the clinical workup of kidney injury in posttransplant patients is highly variable and frequently deviates from evidence-based care. In cases with pathologic evidence of rejection, only 29.1% (102/350) received an appropriate, evidence-based biopsy, whereas, in cases with no pathological evidence of rejection, 41.3% (45/109) received low-value, unnecessary biopsies. CONCLUSION: Clinical care in the posttransplant setting is highly variable. Biopsies are often ordered in cases where their results do not alter treatment. Additionally, we found that misdiagnosis was common as were opportunities for earlier biopsy and detection of rejection. This evidence suggests that better diagnostic tools may be helpful to determine which transplant patients should be biopsied and which should not. This study suggests that nephrologists and transplant patients need better tests than creatinine and proteinuria and less invasive approaches than routine biopsies to determine when transplant patients should be investigated for rejection and additional treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6535838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65358382019-06-18 Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice Peabody, John Billings, Paul Valdenor, Czarlota Demko, Zach Moshkevich, Solomon Paculdo, David Tran, Mary Int J Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of early detection and treatment of allograft rejection is well-established. Despite frequent testing called for by standard of care protocols, the five-year kidney allograft survival rate is estimated to be as low as 71%. Herein, we report on posttransplant care provided to kidney allograft recipients by board-certified nephrologists in the United States. METHODS: We measured clinical practice in a representative sample of 175 practicing nephrologists. All providers cared for simulated patients' status after renal transplant ranging from 30-75 years in age and 3-24 months after transplant. Our sample of nephrologists cared for a total of 525 allograft cases. Provider responses to the cases were reviewed by trained clinicians, and care was compared to evidence-based care standards and accepted standard of care protocols. RESULTS: Among nephrologists, practicing in settings ranging from transplant centers to community practice, we found that the clinical workup of kidney injury in posttransplant patients is highly variable and frequently deviates from evidence-based care. In cases with pathologic evidence of rejection, only 29.1% (102/350) received an appropriate, evidence-based biopsy, whereas, in cases with no pathological evidence of rejection, 41.3% (45/109) received low-value, unnecessary biopsies. CONCLUSION: Clinical care in the posttransplant setting is highly variable. Biopsies are often ordered in cases where their results do not alter treatment. Additionally, we found that misdiagnosis was common as were opportunities for earlier biopsy and detection of rejection. This evidence suggests that better diagnostic tools may be helpful to determine which transplant patients should be biopsied and which should not. This study suggests that nephrologists and transplant patients need better tests than creatinine and proteinuria and less invasive approaches than routine biopsies to determine when transplant patients should be investigated for rejection and additional treatment. Hindawi 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6535838/ /pubmed/31214362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5303284 Text en Copyright © 2019 John Peabody et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peabody, John Billings, Paul Valdenor, Czarlota Demko, Zach Moshkevich, Solomon Paculdo, David Tran, Mary Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice |
title | Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice |
title_full | Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice |
title_fullStr | Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice |
title_short | Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice |
title_sort | variation in assessing renal allograft rejection: a national assessment of nephrology practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5303284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peabodyjohn variationinassessingrenalallograftrejectionanationalassessmentofnephrologypractice AT billingspaul variationinassessingrenalallograftrejectionanationalassessmentofnephrologypractice AT valdenorczarlota variationinassessingrenalallograftrejectionanationalassessmentofnephrologypractice AT demkozach variationinassessingrenalallograftrejectionanationalassessmentofnephrologypractice AT moshkevichsolomon variationinassessingrenalallograftrejectionanationalassessmentofnephrologypractice AT paculdodavid variationinassessingrenalallograftrejectionanationalassessmentofnephrologypractice AT tranmary variationinassessingrenalallograftrejectionanationalassessmentofnephrologypractice |