Cargando…

Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section

INTRODUCTION: A strategy for reducing the number of cesarean sections is to allow vaginal delivery after cesarean section. OBJECTIVE: To validate two predictive models, Metz and Grobman, for successful vaginal delivery after a cesarean section. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study involving women wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonseca, Javier Enrique, Rodriguez, Juliana Lucía, Maya Salazar, Durley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidad del Valle 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168165
http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/cm.v50i1.2521
_version_ 1783421686157148160
author Fonseca, Javier Enrique
Rodriguez, Juliana Lucía
Maya Salazar, Durley
author_facet Fonseca, Javier Enrique
Rodriguez, Juliana Lucía
Maya Salazar, Durley
author_sort Fonseca, Javier Enrique
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A strategy for reducing the number of cesarean sections is to allow vaginal delivery after cesarean section. OBJECTIVE: To validate two predictive models, Metz and Grobman, for successful vaginal delivery after a cesarean section. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study involving women with previous history of a previous segmental cesarean section, single pregnancy ≥37 weeks and cephalic presentation. The proportion of vaginal delivery in all pregnant women was determined, and it was compared with those (women) with successful delivery after cesarean section. Then, there were elaborated the models, and their predictive capacity was determined by curve-receiver-operator. RESULTS: The proportion of successful delivery in pregnant women with a previous cesarean section and indication of vaginal delivery was 85.64%. The observed proportion of birth for each decile predicted in the Grobman model was less than 15%, except for the 91-100% decile, where it was 64.09%; the area under the curve was 0.95. For the Metz model, the actual successful delivery rate was lower than predicted in scores between 4 and 14, and within expected for a score between 15 and 23; the area under the curve was 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal delivery rate after cesarean was lower than expected according to the predictive models of Grobman and Metz. The implementation of these models in a prospective way can lead to a higher rate of successful birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6536040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Universidad del Valle
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65360402019-06-05 Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section Fonseca, Javier Enrique Rodriguez, Juliana Lucía Maya Salazar, Durley Colomb Med (Cali) Original Article INTRODUCTION: A strategy for reducing the number of cesarean sections is to allow vaginal delivery after cesarean section. OBJECTIVE: To validate two predictive models, Metz and Grobman, for successful vaginal delivery after a cesarean section. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study involving women with previous history of a previous segmental cesarean section, single pregnancy ≥37 weeks and cephalic presentation. The proportion of vaginal delivery in all pregnant women was determined, and it was compared with those (women) with successful delivery after cesarean section. Then, there were elaborated the models, and their predictive capacity was determined by curve-receiver-operator. RESULTS: The proportion of successful delivery in pregnant women with a previous cesarean section and indication of vaginal delivery was 85.64%. The observed proportion of birth for each decile predicted in the Grobman model was less than 15%, except for the 91-100% decile, where it was 64.09%; the area under the curve was 0.95. For the Metz model, the actual successful delivery rate was lower than predicted in scores between 4 and 14, and within expected for a score between 15 and 23; the area under the curve was 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal delivery rate after cesarean was lower than expected according to the predictive models of Grobman and Metz. The implementation of these models in a prospective way can lead to a higher rate of successful birth. Universidad del Valle 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6536040/ /pubmed/31168165 http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/cm.v50i1.2521 Text en Copyright © 2019 Universidad del Valle This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fonseca, Javier Enrique
Rodriguez, Juliana Lucía
Maya Salazar, Durley
Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section
title Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section
title_full Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section
title_fullStr Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section
title_short Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section
title_sort validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168165
http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/cm.v50i1.2521
work_keys_str_mv AT fonsecajavierenrique validationofapredictivemodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansection
AT rodriguezjulianalucia validationofapredictivemodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansection
AT mayasalazardurley validationofapredictivemodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansection