Cargando…

LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC

SUMMARY – Laparoscopic appendectomy is the method of choice of many professional societies owing to its many advantages. The question arises whether surgeons urge more easily to laparoscopic exploration due to its less invasiveness, faster recovery and adequate exploration of the entire abdominal ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Augustin, Goran, Čižmešija, Zrinka, Žedelj, Jurica, Petrović, Igor, Ivković, Vanja, Antabak, Anko, Mijatović, Davor, Škegro, Mate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168184
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.14
_version_ 1783421721853820928
author Augustin, Goran
Čižmešija, Zrinka
Žedelj, Jurica
Petrović, Igor
Ivković, Vanja
Antabak, Anko
Mijatović, Davor
Škegro, Mate
author_facet Augustin, Goran
Čižmešija, Zrinka
Žedelj, Jurica
Petrović, Igor
Ivković, Vanja
Antabak, Anko
Mijatović, Davor
Škegro, Mate
author_sort Augustin, Goran
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY – Laparoscopic appendectomy is the method of choice of many professional societies owing to its many advantages. The question arises whether surgeons urge more easily to laparoscopic exploration due to its less invasiveness, faster recovery and adequate exploration of the entire abdominal cavity than to observation in unequivocal cases. This retrospective analysis (2009-2016) included 1899 patients undergoing laparoscopic (lap) or gridiron intra-abdominal approach treated at Zagreb University Hospital Centre. The analysis included total negative appendectomy, negative-negative appendectomy (normal appendix and no other pathology found), and negative-positive appendectomy (normal appendix but another pathology found) in children (≤16 years) and adults. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of negative appendectomy (children) – lap vs. open (p=0.24); negative appendectomy (adults) – lap vs. open (p=0.15); negative-negative appendectomy (children) – lap vs. open (p=0.36); negative-negative appendectomy (adults) – lap vs. open (p=0.21); negative-positive appendectomy (children) – lap vs. open (p=0.53); negative-positive appendectomy (adults) – lap vs. open (p=0.56); and laparoscopy group negative appendectomy in children vs. adults (p=0.56). There was a statistically significantly higher perforation rate with the open approach in total (p<0.0001), in children (p<0.0001) and in adults (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between adults and children in the perforation rate with laparoscopic approach (p=0.24) and perforation rate with open approach (p=0.29). Results confirmed that there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of negative appendectomy in all subgroups. It is concluded that laparoscopic appendectomy should be offered as the method of choice in any patient population with suspicion of acute appendicitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6536279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65362792019-06-04 LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC Augustin, Goran Čižmešija, Zrinka Žedelj, Jurica Petrović, Igor Ivković, Vanja Antabak, Anko Mijatović, Davor Škegro, Mate Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers SUMMARY – Laparoscopic appendectomy is the method of choice of many professional societies owing to its many advantages. The question arises whether surgeons urge more easily to laparoscopic exploration due to its less invasiveness, faster recovery and adequate exploration of the entire abdominal cavity than to observation in unequivocal cases. This retrospective analysis (2009-2016) included 1899 patients undergoing laparoscopic (lap) or gridiron intra-abdominal approach treated at Zagreb University Hospital Centre. The analysis included total negative appendectomy, negative-negative appendectomy (normal appendix and no other pathology found), and negative-positive appendectomy (normal appendix but another pathology found) in children (≤16 years) and adults. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of negative appendectomy (children) – lap vs. open (p=0.24); negative appendectomy (adults) – lap vs. open (p=0.15); negative-negative appendectomy (children) – lap vs. open (p=0.36); negative-negative appendectomy (adults) – lap vs. open (p=0.21); negative-positive appendectomy (children) – lap vs. open (p=0.53); negative-positive appendectomy (adults) – lap vs. open (p=0.56); and laparoscopy group negative appendectomy in children vs. adults (p=0.56). There was a statistically significantly higher perforation rate with the open approach in total (p<0.0001), in children (p<0.0001) and in adults (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between adults and children in the perforation rate with laparoscopic approach (p=0.24) and perforation rate with open approach (p=0.29). Results confirmed that there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of negative appendectomy in all subgroups. It is concluded that laparoscopic appendectomy should be offered as the method of choice in any patient population with suspicion of acute appendicitis. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6536279/ /pubmed/31168184 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.14 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Augustin, Goran
Čižmešija, Zrinka
Žedelj, Jurica
Petrović, Igor
Ivković, Vanja
Antabak, Anko
Mijatović, Davor
Škegro, Mate
LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC
title LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC
title_full LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC
title_fullStr LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC
title_full_unstemmed LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC
title_short LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC
title_sort laparoscopic appendectomy does not increase the rate of negative appendectomy along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis – results in 1899 patients at zagreb uhc
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168184
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.14
work_keys_str_mv AT augustingoran laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc
AT cizmesijazrinka laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc
AT zedeljjurica laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc
AT petrovicigor laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc
AT ivkovicvanja laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc
AT antabakanko laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc
AT mijatovicdavor laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc
AT skegromate laparoscopicappendectomydoesnotincreasetherateofnegativeappendectomyalongwithalowerrateofperforatedappendicitisresultsin1899patientsatzagrebuhc