Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan
BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib demonstrated a treatment effect on overall survival by the statistical confirmation of non-inferiority to sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib compared with sorafenib for patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0 |
_version_ | 1783421750660300800 |
---|---|
author | Kobayashi, Masahiro Kudo, Masatoshi Izumi, Namiki Kaneko, Shuichi Azuma, Mie Copher, Ronda Meier, Genevieve Pan, Janice Ishii, Mika Ikeda, Shunya |
author_facet | Kobayashi, Masahiro Kudo, Masatoshi Izumi, Namiki Kaneko, Shuichi Azuma, Mie Copher, Ronda Meier, Genevieve Pan, Janice Ishii, Mika Ikeda, Shunya |
author_sort | Kobayashi, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib demonstrated a treatment effect on overall survival by the statistical confirmation of non-inferiority to sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib compared with sorafenib for patients with uHCC in Japan. METHODS: A partitioned-survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib versus sorafenib when treating uHCC patients over a lifetime horizon and considering total public healthcare expenditure. Efficacy and safety data were extracted from the REFLECT trial. Utility values were derived from the European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension Questionnaire, conducted with patients enrolled in the REFLECT trial. Direct medical costs, such as primary drug therapy, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests, hospitalization, post-progression therapy, and adverse-event treatments, were included. Cost parameters unavailable in the clinical trial or publications were obtained based on the consolidated clinical standards from a Delphi panel of four Japanese medical experts. RESULTS: For lenvatinib versus sorafenib, the incremental cost was − 406,307 Japanese Yen (JPY), and the incremental life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.27 and 0.23, respectively. Thus, lenvatinib dominated sorafenib, due to the mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio falling in the fourth quadrant, conferring more benefit at lower costs compared with sorafenib. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 81.3% of the simulations were favorable to lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, with a payer’s willingness-to-pay-per-QALY of 5 million JPY. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib was cost-effective compared with sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC in Japan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6536477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65364772019-06-12 Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan Kobayashi, Masahiro Kudo, Masatoshi Izumi, Namiki Kaneko, Shuichi Azuma, Mie Copher, Ronda Meier, Genevieve Pan, Janice Ishii, Mika Ikeda, Shunya J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib demonstrated a treatment effect on overall survival by the statistical confirmation of non-inferiority to sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib compared with sorafenib for patients with uHCC in Japan. METHODS: A partitioned-survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib versus sorafenib when treating uHCC patients over a lifetime horizon and considering total public healthcare expenditure. Efficacy and safety data were extracted from the REFLECT trial. Utility values were derived from the European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension Questionnaire, conducted with patients enrolled in the REFLECT trial. Direct medical costs, such as primary drug therapy, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests, hospitalization, post-progression therapy, and adverse-event treatments, were included. Cost parameters unavailable in the clinical trial or publications were obtained based on the consolidated clinical standards from a Delphi panel of four Japanese medical experts. RESULTS: For lenvatinib versus sorafenib, the incremental cost was − 406,307 Japanese Yen (JPY), and the incremental life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.27 and 0.23, respectively. Thus, lenvatinib dominated sorafenib, due to the mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio falling in the fourth quadrant, conferring more benefit at lower costs compared with sorafenib. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 81.3% of the simulations were favorable to lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, with a payer’s willingness-to-pay-per-QALY of 5 million JPY. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib was cost-effective compared with sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC in Japan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Japan 2019-02-20 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6536477/ /pubmed/30788569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract Kobayashi, Masahiro Kudo, Masatoshi Izumi, Namiki Kaneko, Shuichi Azuma, Mie Copher, Ronda Meier, Genevieve Pan, Janice Ishii, Mika Ikeda, Shunya Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uhcc) compared with sorafenib in japan |
topic | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobayashimasahiro costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT kudomasatoshi costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT izuminamiki costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT kanekoshuichi costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT azumamie costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT copherronda costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT meiergenevieve costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT panjanice costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT ishiimika costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan AT ikedashunya costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan |