Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib demonstrated a treatment effect on overall survival by the statistical confirmation of non-inferiority to sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib compared with sorafenib for patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Masahiro, Kudo, Masatoshi, Izumi, Namiki, Kaneko, Shuichi, Azuma, Mie, Copher, Ronda, Meier, Genevieve, Pan, Janice, Ishii, Mika, Ikeda, Shunya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0
_version_ 1783421750660300800
author Kobayashi, Masahiro
Kudo, Masatoshi
Izumi, Namiki
Kaneko, Shuichi
Azuma, Mie
Copher, Ronda
Meier, Genevieve
Pan, Janice
Ishii, Mika
Ikeda, Shunya
author_facet Kobayashi, Masahiro
Kudo, Masatoshi
Izumi, Namiki
Kaneko, Shuichi
Azuma, Mie
Copher, Ronda
Meier, Genevieve
Pan, Janice
Ishii, Mika
Ikeda, Shunya
author_sort Kobayashi, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib demonstrated a treatment effect on overall survival by the statistical confirmation of non-inferiority to sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib compared with sorafenib for patients with uHCC in Japan. METHODS: A partitioned-survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib versus sorafenib when treating uHCC patients over a lifetime horizon and considering total public healthcare expenditure. Efficacy and safety data were extracted from the REFLECT trial. Utility values were derived from the European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension Questionnaire, conducted with patients enrolled in the REFLECT trial. Direct medical costs, such as primary drug therapy, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests, hospitalization, post-progression therapy, and adverse-event treatments, were included. Cost parameters unavailable in the clinical trial or publications were obtained based on the consolidated clinical standards from a Delphi panel of four Japanese medical experts. RESULTS: For lenvatinib versus sorafenib, the incremental cost was − 406,307 Japanese Yen (JPY), and the incremental life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.27 and 0.23, respectively. Thus, lenvatinib dominated sorafenib, due to the mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio falling in the fourth quadrant, conferring more benefit at lower costs compared with sorafenib. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 81.3% of the simulations were favorable to lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, with a payer’s willingness-to-pay-per-QALY of 5 million JPY. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib was cost-effective compared with sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC in Japan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6536477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65364772019-06-12 Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan Kobayashi, Masahiro Kudo, Masatoshi Izumi, Namiki Kaneko, Shuichi Azuma, Mie Copher, Ronda Meier, Genevieve Pan, Janice Ishii, Mika Ikeda, Shunya J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib demonstrated a treatment effect on overall survival by the statistical confirmation of non-inferiority to sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib compared with sorafenib for patients with uHCC in Japan. METHODS: A partitioned-survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib versus sorafenib when treating uHCC patients over a lifetime horizon and considering total public healthcare expenditure. Efficacy and safety data were extracted from the REFLECT trial. Utility values were derived from the European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension Questionnaire, conducted with patients enrolled in the REFLECT trial. Direct medical costs, such as primary drug therapy, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests, hospitalization, post-progression therapy, and adverse-event treatments, were included. Cost parameters unavailable in the clinical trial or publications were obtained based on the consolidated clinical standards from a Delphi panel of four Japanese medical experts. RESULTS: For lenvatinib versus sorafenib, the incremental cost was − 406,307 Japanese Yen (JPY), and the incremental life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.27 and 0.23, respectively. Thus, lenvatinib dominated sorafenib, due to the mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio falling in the fourth quadrant, conferring more benefit at lower costs compared with sorafenib. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 81.3% of the simulations were favorable to lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, with a payer’s willingness-to-pay-per-QALY of 5 million JPY. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib was cost-effective compared with sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC in Japan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Japan 2019-02-20 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6536477/ /pubmed/30788569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
Kobayashi, Masahiro
Kudo, Masatoshi
Izumi, Namiki
Kaneko, Shuichi
Azuma, Mie
Copher, Ronda
Meier, Genevieve
Pan, Janice
Ishii, Mika
Ikeda, Shunya
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uhcc) compared with sorafenib in japan
topic Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01554-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashimasahiro costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT kudomasatoshi costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT izuminamiki costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT kanekoshuichi costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT azumamie costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT copherronda costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT meiergenevieve costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT panjanice costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT ishiimika costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan
AT ikedashunya costeffectivenessanalysisoflenvatinibtreatmentforpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomauhcccomparedwithsorafenibinjapan