Cargando…
Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism
Rensch’s rule (RR) postulates that in comparisons across closely related species, male body size relative to female size increases with the average size of the species. This holds true in several vertebrate and also in certain free-living invertebrate taxa. Here, we document the validity of RR in av...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44370-5 |
_version_ | 1783421761859092480 |
---|---|
author | Piross, Imre Sándor Harnos, Andrea Rózsa, Lajos |
author_facet | Piross, Imre Sándor Harnos, Andrea Rózsa, Lajos |
author_sort | Piross, Imre Sándor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rensch’s rule (RR) postulates that in comparisons across closely related species, male body size relative to female size increases with the average size of the species. This holds true in several vertebrate and also in certain free-living invertebrate taxa. Here, we document the validity of RR in avian lice using three families (Philopteridae, Menoponidae, and Ricinidae). Using published data on the body length of 989 louse species, subspecies, or distinct intraspecific lineages, we applied phylogenetic reduced major axis regression to analyse the body size of females vs. males while accounting for phylogenetic non-independence. Our results indicate that philopterid and menoponid lice follow RR, while ricinids exhibit the opposite pattern. In the case of philopterids and menoponids, we argue that larger-bodied bird species tend to host lice that are both larger in size and more abundant. Thus, sexual selection acting on males makes them relatively larger, and this is stronger than fecundity selection acting on females. Ricinids exhibit converse RR, likely because fecundity selection is stronger in their case. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6536520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65365202019-06-06 Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism Piross, Imre Sándor Harnos, Andrea Rózsa, Lajos Sci Rep Article Rensch’s rule (RR) postulates that in comparisons across closely related species, male body size relative to female size increases with the average size of the species. This holds true in several vertebrate and also in certain free-living invertebrate taxa. Here, we document the validity of RR in avian lice using three families (Philopteridae, Menoponidae, and Ricinidae). Using published data on the body length of 989 louse species, subspecies, or distinct intraspecific lineages, we applied phylogenetic reduced major axis regression to analyse the body size of females vs. males while accounting for phylogenetic non-independence. Our results indicate that philopterid and menoponid lice follow RR, while ricinids exhibit the opposite pattern. In the case of philopterids and menoponids, we argue that larger-bodied bird species tend to host lice that are both larger in size and more abundant. Thus, sexual selection acting on males makes them relatively larger, and this is stronger than fecundity selection acting on females. Ricinids exhibit converse RR, likely because fecundity selection is stronger in their case. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6536520/ /pubmed/31133727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44370-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Piross, Imre Sándor Harnos, Andrea Rózsa, Lajos Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism |
title | Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism |
title_full | Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism |
title_fullStr | Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism |
title_full_unstemmed | Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism |
title_short | Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism |
title_sort | rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44370-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pirossimresandor renschsruleinavianlicecontradictoryallometrictrendsforsexualsizedimorphism AT harnosandrea renschsruleinavianlicecontradictoryallometrictrendsforsexualsizedimorphism AT rozsalajos renschsruleinavianlicecontradictoryallometrictrendsforsexualsizedimorphism |