Cargando…
Responsibility Without Freedom? Folk Judgements About Deliberate Actions
A long-standing position in philosophy, law, and theology is that a person can be held morally responsible for an action only if they had the freedom to choose and to act otherwise. Thus, many philosophers consider freedom to be a necessary condition for moral responsibility. However, empirical find...
Autores principales: | Vierkant, Tillmann, Deutschländer, Robert, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Haynes, John-Dylan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01133 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Facing facts about deliberate practice
por: Hambrick, David Z., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Folk Moral Objectivism: The Case of Harmful Actions
por: Sousa, Paulo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
From Freedom From to Freedom To: New Perspectives on Intentional Action
por: Bonicalzi, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Unconscious Motives and Actions – Agency, Freedom and Responsibility
por: Lumer, Christoph
Publicado: (2019) -
Folk beliefs about genetic variation predict avoidance of biracial individuals
por: Kang, Sonia K., et al.
Publicado: (2015)