Cargando…

The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase

Background: Microbiological culture has been considered the standard for pathogen identification for decades. However, culture is a laborious, time consuming, imperfect and outdated process. This study aims to inform the orthopedic community of the steps and timing of routine culture processing. Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blevins, Kier M., Goswami, Karan, Parvizi, Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192111
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.32975
_version_ 1783421849979322368
author Blevins, Kier M.
Goswami, Karan
Parvizi, Javad
author_facet Blevins, Kier M.
Goswami, Karan
Parvizi, Javad
author_sort Blevins, Kier M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Microbiological culture has been considered the standard for pathogen identification for decades. However, culture is a laborious, time consuming, imperfect and outdated process. This study aims to inform the orthopedic community of the steps and timing of routine culture processing. Methods: We prospectively tracked 103 cultures from 33 revision hip and knee arthroplasty patients between September 2017-February 2018. Times were recorded at intraoperative collection; time of pick up from OR, transportation time; arrival at the laboratory; culture processing and plating time; and time to final result reporting. Results: Of the 103 cultures, 45.6% were processed and incubated in less than two hours, and 54.4% greater than or equal to two hours. The mean time spent in the OR, during transport, and within the laboratory prior to incubation was 0:53, 0:06 and 1:12. The range of time that samples remained at each stage varied considerably in the OR (0:03-3:33), in transit(0:04-0:16), and in the lab prior to incubation(0:26-3:01). The proportion of the total time to incubation attributed to idle time samples spent in the OR after initial sampling was 40.0%. In contrast, transport to the laboratory represented 5.1% of the total time. Idle time in the laboratory represented the greatest share at 54.9%. Conclusion: There is significant variability in the time to transport, process and incubate culture samples. Almost half of the specimens were processed outside the 2-hour recommended window. Surgeons should be aware of idle time during processing and seek to optimize their institutional pathways to maximize culture yield.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6536803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65368032019-06-12 The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase Blevins, Kier M. Goswami, Karan Parvizi, Javad J Bone Jt Infect Research Paper Background: Microbiological culture has been considered the standard for pathogen identification for decades. However, culture is a laborious, time consuming, imperfect and outdated process. This study aims to inform the orthopedic community of the steps and timing of routine culture processing. Methods: We prospectively tracked 103 cultures from 33 revision hip and knee arthroplasty patients between September 2017-February 2018. Times were recorded at intraoperative collection; time of pick up from OR, transportation time; arrival at the laboratory; culture processing and plating time; and time to final result reporting. Results: Of the 103 cultures, 45.6% were processed and incubated in less than two hours, and 54.4% greater than or equal to two hours. The mean time spent in the OR, during transport, and within the laboratory prior to incubation was 0:53, 0:06 and 1:12. The range of time that samples remained at each stage varied considerably in the OR (0:03-3:33), in transit(0:04-0:16), and in the lab prior to incubation(0:26-3:01). The proportion of the total time to incubation attributed to idle time samples spent in the OR after initial sampling was 40.0%. In contrast, transport to the laboratory represented 5.1% of the total time. Idle time in the laboratory represented the greatest share at 54.9%. Conclusion: There is significant variability in the time to transport, process and incubate culture samples. Almost half of the specimens were processed outside the 2-hour recommended window. Surgeons should be aware of idle time during processing and seek to optimize their institutional pathways to maximize culture yield. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6536803/ /pubmed/31192111 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.32975 Text en © The authors This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Blevins, Kier M.
Goswami, Karan
Parvizi, Javad
The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase
title The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase
title_full The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase
title_fullStr The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase
title_full_unstemmed The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase
title_short The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase
title_sort journey of cultures taken during revision joint arthroplasty: preanalytical phase
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192111
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.32975
work_keys_str_mv AT blevinskierm thejourneyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase
AT goswamikaran thejourneyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase
AT parvizijavad thejourneyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase
AT blevinskierm journeyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase
AT goswamikaran journeyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase
AT parvizijavad journeyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase