Cargando…
The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase
Background: Microbiological culture has been considered the standard for pathogen identification for decades. However, culture is a laborious, time consuming, imperfect and outdated process. This study aims to inform the orthopedic community of the steps and timing of routine culture processing. Met...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192111 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.32975 |
_version_ | 1783421849979322368 |
---|---|
author | Blevins, Kier M. Goswami, Karan Parvizi, Javad |
author_facet | Blevins, Kier M. Goswami, Karan Parvizi, Javad |
author_sort | Blevins, Kier M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Microbiological culture has been considered the standard for pathogen identification for decades. However, culture is a laborious, time consuming, imperfect and outdated process. This study aims to inform the orthopedic community of the steps and timing of routine culture processing. Methods: We prospectively tracked 103 cultures from 33 revision hip and knee arthroplasty patients between September 2017-February 2018. Times were recorded at intraoperative collection; time of pick up from OR, transportation time; arrival at the laboratory; culture processing and plating time; and time to final result reporting. Results: Of the 103 cultures, 45.6% were processed and incubated in less than two hours, and 54.4% greater than or equal to two hours. The mean time spent in the OR, during transport, and within the laboratory prior to incubation was 0:53, 0:06 and 1:12. The range of time that samples remained at each stage varied considerably in the OR (0:03-3:33), in transit(0:04-0:16), and in the lab prior to incubation(0:26-3:01). The proportion of the total time to incubation attributed to idle time samples spent in the OR after initial sampling was 40.0%. In contrast, transport to the laboratory represented 5.1% of the total time. Idle time in the laboratory represented the greatest share at 54.9%. Conclusion: There is significant variability in the time to transport, process and incubate culture samples. Almost half of the specimens were processed outside the 2-hour recommended window. Surgeons should be aware of idle time during processing and seek to optimize their institutional pathways to maximize culture yield. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6536803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65368032019-06-12 The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase Blevins, Kier M. Goswami, Karan Parvizi, Javad J Bone Jt Infect Research Paper Background: Microbiological culture has been considered the standard for pathogen identification for decades. However, culture is a laborious, time consuming, imperfect and outdated process. This study aims to inform the orthopedic community of the steps and timing of routine culture processing. Methods: We prospectively tracked 103 cultures from 33 revision hip and knee arthroplasty patients between September 2017-February 2018. Times were recorded at intraoperative collection; time of pick up from OR, transportation time; arrival at the laboratory; culture processing and plating time; and time to final result reporting. Results: Of the 103 cultures, 45.6% were processed and incubated in less than two hours, and 54.4% greater than or equal to two hours. The mean time spent in the OR, during transport, and within the laboratory prior to incubation was 0:53, 0:06 and 1:12. The range of time that samples remained at each stage varied considerably in the OR (0:03-3:33), in transit(0:04-0:16), and in the lab prior to incubation(0:26-3:01). The proportion of the total time to incubation attributed to idle time samples spent in the OR after initial sampling was 40.0%. In contrast, transport to the laboratory represented 5.1% of the total time. Idle time in the laboratory represented the greatest share at 54.9%. Conclusion: There is significant variability in the time to transport, process and incubate culture samples. Almost half of the specimens were processed outside the 2-hour recommended window. Surgeons should be aware of idle time during processing and seek to optimize their institutional pathways to maximize culture yield. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6536803/ /pubmed/31192111 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.32975 Text en © The authors This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Blevins, Kier M. Goswami, Karan Parvizi, Javad The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase |
title | The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase |
title_full | The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase |
title_fullStr | The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase |
title_full_unstemmed | The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase |
title_short | The Journey of Cultures Taken During Revision Joint Arthroplasty: Preanalytical Phase |
title_sort | journey of cultures taken during revision joint arthroplasty: preanalytical phase |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192111 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.32975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blevinskierm thejourneyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase AT goswamikaran thejourneyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase AT parvizijavad thejourneyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase AT blevinskierm journeyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase AT goswamikaran journeyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase AT parvizijavad journeyofculturestakenduringrevisionjointarthroplastypreanalyticalphase |