Cargando…

Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling (GEP) has been integrated into cancer treatment decision‐making in multiple neoplasms. We prospectively evaluated the prognostic utility of the 31‐GEP test (DecisionDx‐Melanoma, Castle Biosciences, Inc) in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients undergoing sentinel nod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keller, Jennifer, Schwartz, Theresa L., Lizalek, Jason M., Chang, Ea‐sle, Patel, Ashaki D., Hurley, Maria Y., Hsueh, Eddy C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2128
_version_ 1783421880278974464
author Keller, Jennifer
Schwartz, Theresa L.
Lizalek, Jason M.
Chang, Ea‐sle
Patel, Ashaki D.
Hurley, Maria Y.
Hsueh, Eddy C.
author_facet Keller, Jennifer
Schwartz, Theresa L.
Lizalek, Jason M.
Chang, Ea‐sle
Patel, Ashaki D.
Hurley, Maria Y.
Hsueh, Eddy C.
author_sort Keller, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling (GEP) has been integrated into cancer treatment decision‐making in multiple neoplasms. We prospectively evaluated the prognostic utility of the 31‐GEP test (DecisionDx‐Melanoma, Castle Biosciences, Inc) in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy (SNB). METHODS: One hundred fifty‐nine patients (age 26‐88) diagnosed with melanoma between 01/2013 and 8/2015 underwent SNB and concurrent GEP testing. GEP results were reported as low‐risk Class 1 (subclasses 1A and 1B) or high‐risk Class 2 (subclasses 2A and 2B). Statistical analyses were performed with chi‐square analysis, t tests, log‐rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models. Recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) were estimated using Kaplan‐Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow‐up was 44.9 months for event‐free cases. Median Breslow thickness was 1.4 mm (0.2‐15.0 mm). There were 117 Class 1 and 42 Class 2 patients. Gender, age, Breslow thickness, ulceration, SNB positivity, and AJCC stage were significantly associated with GEP classification (P < 0.05 for all). Recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 5% and 1% for Class 1 patients compared with 55% and 36% for Class 2 patients. Sensitivities of Class 2 and SNB for recurrence were 79% and 34%, respectively. Of 10 SNB‐positive/Class 2 patients, 9 recurred. By multivariate analysis, only SNB result and GEP class were statistically associated with both RFS (P = 0.008 and 0.0001) and DMFS (P = 0.019 and 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression profiling Class 2 result and SNB positivity were independently associated with recurrence and distant metastasis in primary CM patients. GEP testing may have additive prognostic utility in initial staging work‐up of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6536922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65369222019-06-03 Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma Keller, Jennifer Schwartz, Theresa L. Lizalek, Jason M. Chang, Ea‐sle Patel, Ashaki D. Hurley, Maria Y. Hsueh, Eddy C. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling (GEP) has been integrated into cancer treatment decision‐making in multiple neoplasms. We prospectively evaluated the prognostic utility of the 31‐GEP test (DecisionDx‐Melanoma, Castle Biosciences, Inc) in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy (SNB). METHODS: One hundred fifty‐nine patients (age 26‐88) diagnosed with melanoma between 01/2013 and 8/2015 underwent SNB and concurrent GEP testing. GEP results were reported as low‐risk Class 1 (subclasses 1A and 1B) or high‐risk Class 2 (subclasses 2A and 2B). Statistical analyses were performed with chi‐square analysis, t tests, log‐rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models. Recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) were estimated using Kaplan‐Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow‐up was 44.9 months for event‐free cases. Median Breslow thickness was 1.4 mm (0.2‐15.0 mm). There were 117 Class 1 and 42 Class 2 patients. Gender, age, Breslow thickness, ulceration, SNB positivity, and AJCC stage were significantly associated with GEP classification (P < 0.05 for all). Recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 5% and 1% for Class 1 patients compared with 55% and 36% for Class 2 patients. Sensitivities of Class 2 and SNB for recurrence were 79% and 34%, respectively. Of 10 SNB‐positive/Class 2 patients, 9 recurred. By multivariate analysis, only SNB result and GEP class were statistically associated with both RFS (P = 0.008 and 0.0001) and DMFS (P = 0.019 and 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression profiling Class 2 result and SNB positivity were independently associated with recurrence and distant metastasis in primary CM patients. GEP testing may have additive prognostic utility in initial staging work‐up of these patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6536922/ /pubmed/30950242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2128 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Keller, Jennifer
Schwartz, Theresa L.
Lizalek, Jason M.
Chang, Ea‐sle
Patel, Ashaki D.
Hurley, Maria Y.
Hsueh, Eddy C.
Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma
title Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma
title_full Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma
title_fullStr Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma
title_short Prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma
title_sort prospective validation of the prognostic 31‐gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2128
work_keys_str_mv AT kellerjennifer prospectivevalidationoftheprognostic31geneexpressionprofilingtestinprimarycutaneousmelanoma
AT schwartztheresal prospectivevalidationoftheprognostic31geneexpressionprofilingtestinprimarycutaneousmelanoma
AT lizalekjasonm prospectivevalidationoftheprognostic31geneexpressionprofilingtestinprimarycutaneousmelanoma
AT changeasle prospectivevalidationoftheprognostic31geneexpressionprofilingtestinprimarycutaneousmelanoma
AT patelashakid prospectivevalidationoftheprognostic31geneexpressionprofilingtestinprimarycutaneousmelanoma
AT hurleymariay prospectivevalidationoftheprognostic31geneexpressionprofilingtestinprimarycutaneousmelanoma
AT hsueheddyc prospectivevalidationoftheprognostic31geneexpressionprofilingtestinprimarycutaneousmelanoma