Cargando…

Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies

AIM: To assess the efficacy of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron 300/0.50 mg) over multiple chemotherapy cycles. METHODS: Two randomized phase III studies evaluated a single dose of oral NEPA given on day 1 in chemotherapy‐naive patients receiving anthracycline‐cyclophosphamide (AC)–based (Study 1)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwartzberg, Lee, Karthaus, Meinolf, Rossi, Giorgia, Rizzi, Giada, Borroni, Maria E., Rugo, Hope S., Jordan, Karin, Hansen, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2091
_version_ 1783421887231033344
author Schwartzberg, Lee
Karthaus, Meinolf
Rossi, Giorgia
Rizzi, Giada
Borroni, Maria E.
Rugo, Hope S.
Jordan, Karin
Hansen, Vincent
author_facet Schwartzberg, Lee
Karthaus, Meinolf
Rossi, Giorgia
Rizzi, Giada
Borroni, Maria E.
Rugo, Hope S.
Jordan, Karin
Hansen, Vincent
author_sort Schwartzberg, Lee
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the efficacy of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron 300/0.50 mg) over multiple chemotherapy cycles. METHODS: Two randomized phase III studies evaluated a single dose of oral NEPA given on day 1 in chemotherapy‐naive patients receiving anthracycline‐cyclophosphamide (AC)–based (Study 1) or highly (HEC)/moderately (MEC) emetogenic chemotherapy (safety Study 2). Oral NEPA was compared with oral palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 1) or oral aprepitant 125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2‐3/palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 2; no formal statistical comparisons). Oral dexamethasone was administered in all treatment groups. Complete response (CR; no emesis/no rescue medication), no emesis, and no significant nausea (NSN) rates during acute (0‐24 h) and delayed (>24‐120 h) phases of chemotherapy cycles 1‐4 in each study were evaluated. RESULTS: In Study 1, 1450 patients received 5969 chemotherapy cycles; in Study 2, 412 patients received 1961 chemotherapy cycles. In each study, ≥75% of patients completed 4 or more cycles. In Study 1, oral NEPA was superior to palonosetron in preventing chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the acute and delayed phases of cycle 1, with higher rates of CR (all P < 0.05), no emesis (all P < 0.05), and NSN (delayed phase P < 0.05 cycles 1, 2, and 4) reported across 4 cycles. In Study 2, oral NEPA had numerically higher CR and NSN rates in the acute and delayed phases than aprepitant‐palonosetron in MEC/HEC patients. CONCLUSION: Oral NEPA was highly effective in preventing both acute and delayed CINV over multiple chemotherapy cycles of HEC, AC, and MEC regimens. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Study 1, NCT01339260; Study 2, NCT01376297.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6536946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65369462019-06-03 Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies Schwartzberg, Lee Karthaus, Meinolf Rossi, Giorgia Rizzi, Giada Borroni, Maria E. Rugo, Hope S. Jordan, Karin Hansen, Vincent Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research AIM: To assess the efficacy of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron 300/0.50 mg) over multiple chemotherapy cycles. METHODS: Two randomized phase III studies evaluated a single dose of oral NEPA given on day 1 in chemotherapy‐naive patients receiving anthracycline‐cyclophosphamide (AC)–based (Study 1) or highly (HEC)/moderately (MEC) emetogenic chemotherapy (safety Study 2). Oral NEPA was compared with oral palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 1) or oral aprepitant 125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2‐3/palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 2; no formal statistical comparisons). Oral dexamethasone was administered in all treatment groups. Complete response (CR; no emesis/no rescue medication), no emesis, and no significant nausea (NSN) rates during acute (0‐24 h) and delayed (>24‐120 h) phases of chemotherapy cycles 1‐4 in each study were evaluated. RESULTS: In Study 1, 1450 patients received 5969 chemotherapy cycles; in Study 2, 412 patients received 1961 chemotherapy cycles. In each study, ≥75% of patients completed 4 or more cycles. In Study 1, oral NEPA was superior to palonosetron in preventing chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the acute and delayed phases of cycle 1, with higher rates of CR (all P < 0.05), no emesis (all P < 0.05), and NSN (delayed phase P < 0.05 cycles 1, 2, and 4) reported across 4 cycles. In Study 2, oral NEPA had numerically higher CR and NSN rates in the acute and delayed phases than aprepitant‐palonosetron in MEC/HEC patients. CONCLUSION: Oral NEPA was highly effective in preventing both acute and delayed CINV over multiple chemotherapy cycles of HEC, AC, and MEC regimens. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Study 1, NCT01339260; Study 2, NCT01376297. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6536946/ /pubmed/30968588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2091 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Schwartzberg, Lee
Karthaus, Meinolf
Rossi, Giorgia
Rizzi, Giada
Borroni, Maria E.
Rugo, Hope S.
Jordan, Karin
Hansen, Vincent
Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
title Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
title_full Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
title_fullStr Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
title_full_unstemmed Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
title_short Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
title_sort fixed combination of oral nepa (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase iii studies
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2091
work_keys_str_mv AT schwartzberglee fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies
AT karthausmeinolf fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies
AT rossigiorgia fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies
AT rizzigiada fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies
AT borronimariae fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies
AT rugohopes fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies
AT jordankarin fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies
AT hansenvincent fixedcombinationoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetronforthepreventionofacuteanddelayedchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginpatientsreceivingmultiplecyclesofchemotherapyefficacydatafrom2randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudies