Cargando…

The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country

INTRODUCTION: Renal biopsy is a useful diagnostic procedure. In developing countries, two techniques of renal biopsy, blind percutaneous renal biopsy and real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy, have been performed. The majority of studies compared these using different types and sizes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pongsittisak, Wanjak, Wutilertcharoenwong, Naphat, Ngamvichchukorn, Tanun, Kurathong, Sathit, Chavanisakun, Chutima, Teepprasan, Tavichai, Prommool, Surazee, Srisawat, Nattachai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312119849770
_version_ 1783421916623667200
author Pongsittisak, Wanjak
Wutilertcharoenwong, Naphat
Ngamvichchukorn, Tanun
Kurathong, Sathit
Chavanisakun, Chutima
Teepprasan, Tavichai
Prommool, Surazee
Srisawat, Nattachai
author_facet Pongsittisak, Wanjak
Wutilertcharoenwong, Naphat
Ngamvichchukorn, Tanun
Kurathong, Sathit
Chavanisakun, Chutima
Teepprasan, Tavichai
Prommool, Surazee
Srisawat, Nattachai
author_sort Pongsittisak, Wanjak
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Renal biopsy is a useful diagnostic procedure. In developing countries, two techniques of renal biopsy, blind percutaneous renal biopsy and real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy, have been performed. The majority of studies compared these using different types and sizes of biopsy needle. The aim of this study was to compare both techniques in resource constraint country. METHOD: We reviewed renal biopsy database, between 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2017. The primary outcome was the total number of glomeruli. The other outcomes were tissue adequacy and bleeding complications. We also analyzed multivariable logistic regression to find factors associated with tissue adequacy and bleeding complications. RESULT: Of the 204 renal biopsies, 100 were blind percutaneous renal biopsy and 104 real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy. The number of native renal biopsies was 169 (82.8%). Baseline characteristics of two groups were comparable. The mean number of total glomeruli from real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy was significantly more than blind percutaneous renal biopsy (20.8 ± 12.1 vs 16.0 ± 13.0, p = 0.001). The real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy obtained more adequate tissues than blind percutaneous renal biopsy (45.2% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and was the only factor associated with adequate tissue. Moreover, 16 renal biopsies from blind percutaneous renal biopsy obtained inadequate tissue. The overall bleeding complications were not statistically different. We found being female, lower eGFR and lower hematocrit were associated with bleeding complications. CONCLUSION: In comparison with blind percutaneous renal biopsy, real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy obtained more adequate tissue and number of glomeruli. While the complications of both were comparable. We encourage to practice and perform real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in resource constraint countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65370462019-06-14 The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country Pongsittisak, Wanjak Wutilertcharoenwong, Naphat Ngamvichchukorn, Tanun Kurathong, Sathit Chavanisakun, Chutima Teepprasan, Tavichai Prommool, Surazee Srisawat, Nattachai SAGE Open Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: Renal biopsy is a useful diagnostic procedure. In developing countries, two techniques of renal biopsy, blind percutaneous renal biopsy and real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy, have been performed. The majority of studies compared these using different types and sizes of biopsy needle. The aim of this study was to compare both techniques in resource constraint country. METHOD: We reviewed renal biopsy database, between 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2017. The primary outcome was the total number of glomeruli. The other outcomes were tissue adequacy and bleeding complications. We also analyzed multivariable logistic regression to find factors associated with tissue adequacy and bleeding complications. RESULT: Of the 204 renal biopsies, 100 were blind percutaneous renal biopsy and 104 real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy. The number of native renal biopsies was 169 (82.8%). Baseline characteristics of two groups were comparable. The mean number of total glomeruli from real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy was significantly more than blind percutaneous renal biopsy (20.8 ± 12.1 vs 16.0 ± 13.0, p = 0.001). The real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy obtained more adequate tissues than blind percutaneous renal biopsy (45.2% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and was the only factor associated with adequate tissue. Moreover, 16 renal biopsies from blind percutaneous renal biopsy obtained inadequate tissue. The overall bleeding complications were not statistically different. We found being female, lower eGFR and lower hematocrit were associated with bleeding complications. CONCLUSION: In comparison with blind percutaneous renal biopsy, real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy obtained more adequate tissue and number of glomeruli. While the complications of both were comparable. We encourage to practice and perform real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in resource constraint countries. SAGE Publications 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6537046/ /pubmed/31205694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312119849770 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pongsittisak, Wanjak
Wutilertcharoenwong, Naphat
Ngamvichchukorn, Tanun
Kurathong, Sathit
Chavanisakun, Chutima
Teepprasan, Tavichai
Prommool, Surazee
Srisawat, Nattachai
The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country
title The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country
title_full The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country
title_fullStr The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country
title_short The efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country
title_sort efficacy of blind versus real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in developing country
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312119849770
work_keys_str_mv AT pongsittisakwanjak theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT wutilertcharoenwongnaphat theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT ngamvichchukorntanun theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT kurathongsathit theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT chavanisakunchutima theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT teepprasantavichai theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT prommoolsurazee theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT srisawatnattachai theefficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT pongsittisakwanjak efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT wutilertcharoenwongnaphat efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT ngamvichchukorntanun efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT kurathongsathit efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT chavanisakunchutima efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT teepprasantavichai efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT prommoolsurazee efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry
AT srisawatnattachai efficacyofblindversusrealtimeultrasoundguidedpercutaneousrenalbiopsyindevelopingcountry