Cargando…

Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the treatment gap between a new epilepsy diagnosis and antiepileptic drug (AED) initiation in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective claims-based cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan databases (commercial and supplemental Medicare, calendar years 2010–2015; Medicaid,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalilani, Linda, Faught, Edward, Kim, Hyunmi, Burudpakdee, Chakkarin, Seetasith, Arpamas, Laranjo, Scott, Friesen, David, Haeffs, Kathrin, Kiri, Victor, Thurman, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007448
_version_ 1783421931848990720
author Kalilani, Linda
Faught, Edward
Kim, Hyunmi
Burudpakdee, Chakkarin
Seetasith, Arpamas
Laranjo, Scott
Friesen, David
Haeffs, Kathrin
Kiri, Victor
Thurman, David J.
author_facet Kalilani, Linda
Faught, Edward
Kim, Hyunmi
Burudpakdee, Chakkarin
Seetasith, Arpamas
Laranjo, Scott
Friesen, David
Haeffs, Kathrin
Kiri, Victor
Thurman, David J.
author_sort Kalilani, Linda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the treatment gap between a new epilepsy diagnosis and antiepileptic drug (AED) initiation in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective claims-based cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan databases (commercial and supplemental Medicare, calendar years 2010–2015; Medicaid, 2010–2014) and a validation study using PharMetrics Plus Database linked to LRx claims database (2009–2014). Persons met epilepsy diagnostic criteria, had an index date (first epilepsy diagnosis) with a preceding 2-year baseline (1 year for persons aged 1 to <2 years; none for persons <1 year), and continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment without epilepsy/seizure diagnosis or AED prescription during baseline. Outcomes included percentage of untreated persons (no AED prescription) up to 3 years' follow-up and comparative outcomes (incidence rate ratio: untreated persons/treated persons), including medical events and health care resource utilization. RESULTS: In the primary study, 59,970 persons met selection (or inclusion) criteria; 36.7% of persons with newly diagnosed epilepsy remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. In the validation study (N = 30,890), 31.8% of persons remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. Lack of AED treatment was associated with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.2 (1.2–1.3) for medical events, 2.3 (2.2–2.3) for hospitalizations, and 2.8 (2.7–2.9) for emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of newly diagnosed persons remain untreated up to 3 years after epilepsy diagnosis. The increased risk of medical events and health care utilization highlights the consequences of delayed treatment after epilepsy diagnosis, which might be preventable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65371312019-06-27 Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US Kalilani, Linda Faught, Edward Kim, Hyunmi Burudpakdee, Chakkarin Seetasith, Arpamas Laranjo, Scott Friesen, David Haeffs, Kathrin Kiri, Victor Thurman, David J. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To estimate the treatment gap between a new epilepsy diagnosis and antiepileptic drug (AED) initiation in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective claims-based cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan databases (commercial and supplemental Medicare, calendar years 2010–2015; Medicaid, 2010–2014) and a validation study using PharMetrics Plus Database linked to LRx claims database (2009–2014). Persons met epilepsy diagnostic criteria, had an index date (first epilepsy diagnosis) with a preceding 2-year baseline (1 year for persons aged 1 to <2 years; none for persons <1 year), and continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment without epilepsy/seizure diagnosis or AED prescription during baseline. Outcomes included percentage of untreated persons (no AED prescription) up to 3 years' follow-up and comparative outcomes (incidence rate ratio: untreated persons/treated persons), including medical events and health care resource utilization. RESULTS: In the primary study, 59,970 persons met selection (or inclusion) criteria; 36.7% of persons with newly diagnosed epilepsy remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. In the validation study (N = 30,890), 31.8% of persons remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. Lack of AED treatment was associated with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.2 (1.2–1.3) for medical events, 2.3 (2.2–2.3) for hospitalizations, and 2.8 (2.7–2.9) for emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of newly diagnosed persons remain untreated up to 3 years after epilepsy diagnosis. The increased risk of medical events and health care utilization highlights the consequences of delayed treatment after epilepsy diagnosis, which might be preventable. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6537131/ /pubmed/30971487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007448 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Kalilani, Linda
Faught, Edward
Kim, Hyunmi
Burudpakdee, Chakkarin
Seetasith, Arpamas
Laranjo, Scott
Friesen, David
Haeffs, Kathrin
Kiri, Victor
Thurman, David J.
Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US
title Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US
title_full Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US
title_fullStr Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US
title_short Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US
title_sort assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the us
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007448
work_keys_str_mv AT kalilanilinda assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT faughtedward assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT kimhyunmi assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT burudpakdeechakkarin assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT seetasitharpamas assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT laranjoscott assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT friesendavid assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT haeffskathrin assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT kirivictor assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus
AT thurmandavidj assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus