Cargando…
Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the treatment gap between a new epilepsy diagnosis and antiepileptic drug (AED) initiation in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective claims-based cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan databases (commercial and supplemental Medicare, calendar years 2010–2015; Medicaid,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007448 |
_version_ | 1783421931848990720 |
---|---|
author | Kalilani, Linda Faught, Edward Kim, Hyunmi Burudpakdee, Chakkarin Seetasith, Arpamas Laranjo, Scott Friesen, David Haeffs, Kathrin Kiri, Victor Thurman, David J. |
author_facet | Kalilani, Linda Faught, Edward Kim, Hyunmi Burudpakdee, Chakkarin Seetasith, Arpamas Laranjo, Scott Friesen, David Haeffs, Kathrin Kiri, Victor Thurman, David J. |
author_sort | Kalilani, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To estimate the treatment gap between a new epilepsy diagnosis and antiepileptic drug (AED) initiation in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective claims-based cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan databases (commercial and supplemental Medicare, calendar years 2010–2015; Medicaid, 2010–2014) and a validation study using PharMetrics Plus Database linked to LRx claims database (2009–2014). Persons met epilepsy diagnostic criteria, had an index date (first epilepsy diagnosis) with a preceding 2-year baseline (1 year for persons aged 1 to <2 years; none for persons <1 year), and continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment without epilepsy/seizure diagnosis or AED prescription during baseline. Outcomes included percentage of untreated persons (no AED prescription) up to 3 years' follow-up and comparative outcomes (incidence rate ratio: untreated persons/treated persons), including medical events and health care resource utilization. RESULTS: In the primary study, 59,970 persons met selection (or inclusion) criteria; 36.7% of persons with newly diagnosed epilepsy remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. In the validation study (N = 30,890), 31.8% of persons remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. Lack of AED treatment was associated with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.2 (1.2–1.3) for medical events, 2.3 (2.2–2.3) for hospitalizations, and 2.8 (2.7–2.9) for emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of newly diagnosed persons remain untreated up to 3 years after epilepsy diagnosis. The increased risk of medical events and health care utilization highlights the consequences of delayed treatment after epilepsy diagnosis, which might be preventable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6537131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65371312019-06-27 Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US Kalilani, Linda Faught, Edward Kim, Hyunmi Burudpakdee, Chakkarin Seetasith, Arpamas Laranjo, Scott Friesen, David Haeffs, Kathrin Kiri, Victor Thurman, David J. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To estimate the treatment gap between a new epilepsy diagnosis and antiepileptic drug (AED) initiation in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective claims-based cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan databases (commercial and supplemental Medicare, calendar years 2010–2015; Medicaid, 2010–2014) and a validation study using PharMetrics Plus Database linked to LRx claims database (2009–2014). Persons met epilepsy diagnostic criteria, had an index date (first epilepsy diagnosis) with a preceding 2-year baseline (1 year for persons aged 1 to <2 years; none for persons <1 year), and continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment without epilepsy/seizure diagnosis or AED prescription during baseline. Outcomes included percentage of untreated persons (no AED prescription) up to 3 years' follow-up and comparative outcomes (incidence rate ratio: untreated persons/treated persons), including medical events and health care resource utilization. RESULTS: In the primary study, 59,970 persons met selection (or inclusion) criteria; 36.7% of persons with newly diagnosed epilepsy remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. In the validation study (N = 30,890), 31.8% of persons remained untreated up to 3 years after diagnosis. Lack of AED treatment was associated with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.2 (1.2–1.3) for medical events, 2.3 (2.2–2.3) for hospitalizations, and 2.8 (2.7–2.9) for emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of newly diagnosed persons remain untreated up to 3 years after epilepsy diagnosis. The increased risk of medical events and health care utilization highlights the consequences of delayed treatment after epilepsy diagnosis, which might be preventable. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6537131/ /pubmed/30971487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007448 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Kalilani, Linda Faught, Edward Kim, Hyunmi Burudpakdee, Chakkarin Seetasith, Arpamas Laranjo, Scott Friesen, David Haeffs, Kathrin Kiri, Victor Thurman, David J. Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US |
title | Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US |
title_full | Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US |
title_fullStr | Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US |
title_short | Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US |
title_sort | assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the us |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalilanilinda assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT faughtedward assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT kimhyunmi assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT burudpakdeechakkarin assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT seetasitharpamas assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT laranjoscott assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT friesendavid assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT haeffskathrin assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT kirivictor assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus AT thurmandavidj assessmentandeffectofagapbetweennewonsetepilepsydiagnosisandtreatmentintheus |