Cargando…

Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a patient-side blood test in determining neuter status in female cats. METHODS: Residual blood samples from female cats of unknown neuter status that were admitted to four cat adoption centres in the UK were tested for luteinising ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrow, Lisa D, Gruffydd-Jones, Timothy J, Skillings, Elizabeth, Welsh, C Philippa, Murray, Jane K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X18792101
_version_ 1783421932756008960
author Morrow, Lisa D
Gruffydd-Jones, Timothy J
Skillings, Elizabeth
Welsh, C Philippa
Murray, Jane K
author_facet Morrow, Lisa D
Gruffydd-Jones, Timothy J
Skillings, Elizabeth
Welsh, C Philippa
Murray, Jane K
author_sort Morrow, Lisa D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a patient-side blood test in determining neuter status in female cats. METHODS: Residual blood samples from female cats of unknown neuter status that were admitted to four cat adoption centres in the UK were tested for luteinising hormone (LH) using the Witness LH test (Zoetis). A positive LH test result indicated that the cat was neutered. Cats were assessed for evidence of a surgical scar suggestive of prior neutering; if none was found, an exploratory laparotomy was performed to confirm neuter status. The LH test performance was assessed (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value). RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six cats had both LH test and exploratory laparotomy data. The specificity of the test in detecting neutered cats was 100% (95% confidence interval 96.2–99.9) and the sensitivity was 69% (95% confidence interval 59.3–76.8). The prevalence of neutered cats in this sample was 49%. The positive and negative predictive values were 1 and 0.77, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Witness LH test correctly detected all unneutered cats and thus there were no false-positive results that incorrectly indicated a cat was neutered. This study therefore suggests that positive LH test results avoid the need to perform surgery to confirm neuter status. This has significant welfare benefits for cats as it provides a lower risk, faster and less traumatic alternative to surgery and, in the shelter setting, it will have a positive impact on the cost, speed of assessment and time to rehoming of cats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65371372019-06-25 Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone Morrow, Lisa D Gruffydd-Jones, Timothy J Skillings, Elizabeth Welsh, C Philippa Murray, Jane K J Feline Med Surg Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a patient-side blood test in determining neuter status in female cats. METHODS: Residual blood samples from female cats of unknown neuter status that were admitted to four cat adoption centres in the UK were tested for luteinising hormone (LH) using the Witness LH test (Zoetis). A positive LH test result indicated that the cat was neutered. Cats were assessed for evidence of a surgical scar suggestive of prior neutering; if none was found, an exploratory laparotomy was performed to confirm neuter status. The LH test performance was assessed (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value). RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six cats had both LH test and exploratory laparotomy data. The specificity of the test in detecting neutered cats was 100% (95% confidence interval 96.2–99.9) and the sensitivity was 69% (95% confidence interval 59.3–76.8). The prevalence of neutered cats in this sample was 49%. The positive and negative predictive values were 1 and 0.77, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Witness LH test correctly detected all unneutered cats and thus there were no false-positive results that incorrectly indicated a cat was neutered. This study therefore suggests that positive LH test results avoid the need to perform surgery to confirm neuter status. This has significant welfare benefits for cats as it provides a lower risk, faster and less traumatic alternative to surgery and, in the shelter setting, it will have a positive impact on the cost, speed of assessment and time to rehoming of cats. SAGE Publications 2018-08-13 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6537137/ /pubmed/30099965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X18792101 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Morrow, Lisa D
Gruffydd-Jones, Timothy J
Skillings, Elizabeth
Welsh, C Philippa
Murray, Jane K
Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone
title Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone
title_full Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone
title_fullStr Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone
title_full_unstemmed Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone
title_short Field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone
title_sort field study assessing the performance of a patient-side blood test to determine neuter status in female cats based on detection of luteinising hormone
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X18792101
work_keys_str_mv AT morrowlisad fieldstudyassessingtheperformanceofapatientsidebloodtesttodetermineneuterstatusinfemalecatsbasedondetectionofluteinisinghormone
AT gruffyddjonestimothyj fieldstudyassessingtheperformanceofapatientsidebloodtesttodetermineneuterstatusinfemalecatsbasedondetectionofluteinisinghormone
AT skillingselizabeth fieldstudyassessingtheperformanceofapatientsidebloodtesttodetermineneuterstatusinfemalecatsbasedondetectionofluteinisinghormone
AT welshcphilippa fieldstudyassessingtheperformanceofapatientsidebloodtesttodetermineneuterstatusinfemalecatsbasedondetectionofluteinisinghormone
AT murrayjanek fieldstudyassessingtheperformanceofapatientsidebloodtesttodetermineneuterstatusinfemalecatsbasedondetectionofluteinisinghormone