Cargando…

The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a drawback of high recurrence rate. No-touch technique was developed to overcome it. However, it has barely been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to determine the safety an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chai, Yuelong, Li, Kun, Zhang, Chang, Chen, Shihan, Ma, Kuansheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5707-0
_version_ 1783421939912540160
author Chai, Yuelong
Li, Kun
Zhang, Chang
Chen, Shihan
Ma, Kuansheng
author_facet Chai, Yuelong
Li, Kun
Zhang, Chang
Chen, Shihan
Ma, Kuansheng
author_sort Chai, Yuelong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a drawback of high recurrence rate. No-touch technique was developed to overcome it. However, it has barely been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of no-touch RFA in the treatment of cirrhosis-based small HCC patients. METHODS: A total of 130 patients of small HCC in Southwest Hospital were enrolled in this study, 46 cases treated by no-touch RFA and 84 cases by conventional RFA. Treatment complications and tumor-free survival rate and overall survival rate were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline confounding factors between the two groups. The ablation volume of no-touch RFA technique was significantly higher than conventional RFA (P = 0.002) but the remaining liver volume and treatment complications of the two techniques were the same (P = 0.702 and P = 0.269, respectively). Cox regression model revealed that conventional RFA was a predictive factor for short-term HCC recurrence (P = 0.041 for 2-year recurrence rate). Kaplan-Meier survival showed that tumor-free survival in no-touch group was significantly higher than conventional group (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that no-touch RFA provided a higher short-term tumor-free survival rate than conventional RFA but was as safe as conventional RFA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65371622019-05-30 The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma Chai, Yuelong Li, Kun Zhang, Chang Chen, Shihan Ma, Kuansheng BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a drawback of high recurrence rate. No-touch technique was developed to overcome it. However, it has barely been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of no-touch RFA in the treatment of cirrhosis-based small HCC patients. METHODS: A total of 130 patients of small HCC in Southwest Hospital were enrolled in this study, 46 cases treated by no-touch RFA and 84 cases by conventional RFA. Treatment complications and tumor-free survival rate and overall survival rate were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline confounding factors between the two groups. The ablation volume of no-touch RFA technique was significantly higher than conventional RFA (P = 0.002) but the remaining liver volume and treatment complications of the two techniques were the same (P = 0.702 and P = 0.269, respectively). Cox regression model revealed that conventional RFA was a predictive factor for short-term HCC recurrence (P = 0.041 for 2-year recurrence rate). Kaplan-Meier survival showed that tumor-free survival in no-touch group was significantly higher than conventional group (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that no-touch RFA provided a higher short-term tumor-free survival rate than conventional RFA but was as safe as conventional RFA. BioMed Central 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6537162/ /pubmed/31133001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5707-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chai, Yuelong
Li, Kun
Zhang, Chang
Chen, Shihan
Ma, Kuansheng
The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
title The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5707-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chaiyuelong theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT likun theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT zhangchang theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chenshihan theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT makuansheng theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chaiyuelong shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT likun shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT zhangchang shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chenshihan shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT makuansheng shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma