Cargando…
The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a drawback of high recurrence rate. No-touch technique was developed to overcome it. However, it has barely been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to determine the safety an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5707-0 |
_version_ | 1783421939912540160 |
---|---|
author | Chai, Yuelong Li, Kun Zhang, Chang Chen, Shihan Ma, Kuansheng |
author_facet | Chai, Yuelong Li, Kun Zhang, Chang Chen, Shihan Ma, Kuansheng |
author_sort | Chai, Yuelong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a drawback of high recurrence rate. No-touch technique was developed to overcome it. However, it has barely been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of no-touch RFA in the treatment of cirrhosis-based small HCC patients. METHODS: A total of 130 patients of small HCC in Southwest Hospital were enrolled in this study, 46 cases treated by no-touch RFA and 84 cases by conventional RFA. Treatment complications and tumor-free survival rate and overall survival rate were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline confounding factors between the two groups. The ablation volume of no-touch RFA technique was significantly higher than conventional RFA (P = 0.002) but the remaining liver volume and treatment complications of the two techniques were the same (P = 0.702 and P = 0.269, respectively). Cox regression model revealed that conventional RFA was a predictive factor for short-term HCC recurrence (P = 0.041 for 2-year recurrence rate). Kaplan-Meier survival showed that tumor-free survival in no-touch group was significantly higher than conventional group (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that no-touch RFA provided a higher short-term tumor-free survival rate than conventional RFA but was as safe as conventional RFA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6537162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65371622019-05-30 The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma Chai, Yuelong Li, Kun Zhang, Chang Chen, Shihan Ma, Kuansheng BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a drawback of high recurrence rate. No-touch technique was developed to overcome it. However, it has barely been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of no-touch RFA in the treatment of cirrhosis-based small HCC patients. METHODS: A total of 130 patients of small HCC in Southwest Hospital were enrolled in this study, 46 cases treated by no-touch RFA and 84 cases by conventional RFA. Treatment complications and tumor-free survival rate and overall survival rate were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline confounding factors between the two groups. The ablation volume of no-touch RFA technique was significantly higher than conventional RFA (P = 0.002) but the remaining liver volume and treatment complications of the two techniques were the same (P = 0.702 and P = 0.269, respectively). Cox regression model revealed that conventional RFA was a predictive factor for short-term HCC recurrence (P = 0.041 for 2-year recurrence rate). Kaplan-Meier survival showed that tumor-free survival in no-touch group was significantly higher than conventional group (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that no-touch RFA provided a higher short-term tumor-free survival rate than conventional RFA but was as safe as conventional RFA. BioMed Central 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6537162/ /pubmed/31133001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5707-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chai, Yuelong Li, Kun Zhang, Chang Chen, Shihan Ma, Kuansheng The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma |
title | The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full | The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_fullStr | The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_short | The short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_sort | short-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation in treating cirrhosis-based small hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5707-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaiyuelong theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT likun theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT zhangchang theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT chenshihan theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT makuansheng theshorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT chaiyuelong shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT likun shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT zhangchang shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT chenshihan shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT makuansheng shorttermefficacyofnotouchradiofrequencyablationintreatingcirrhosisbasedsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma |