Cargando…
Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: An inappropriate anastomosis method during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection can increase the risk of anastomotic complications and affect surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of anastomotic complications and the surgical, e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7 |
_version_ | 1783421985875820544 |
---|---|
author | You, Xiaolan Wu, Jian Wang, Yuanjie Liu, Qinghong Chen, Dehu Zhao, Xiaojun Zhou, Yan Wu, Xiaoqing Wang, Daorong |
author_facet | You, Xiaolan Wu, Jian Wang, Yuanjie Liu, Qinghong Chen, Dehu Zhao, Xiaojun Zhou, Yan Wu, Xiaoqing Wang, Daorong |
author_sort | You, Xiaolan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An inappropriate anastomosis method during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection can increase the risk of anastomotic complications and affect surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of anastomotic complications and the surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes following single versus double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for low rectal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial (the SINGLE–DOUBLE study) will randomly assign middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma patients to receive either single or double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection. Patients will be eligible for inclusion only if they (1) have adenocarcinoma confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy and biopsy, (2) have a tumor situated less than 12 cm from the anal verge, (3) do not have the anal sphincter involved, and (4) do not have distant metastases. The primary endpoint measure will be the incidence of anastomotic complications (leakage, narrowing, and bleeding). The secondary endpoints will be surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. A total of 500 patients will be enrolled in the study. Sample size calculation was based on previous reports and our retrospective analysis. DISCUSSION: This randomized single-center controlled trial is expected to demonstrate which anastomosis method (single or double purse-string anastomosis) is better for reducing complications and improving prognosis in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic TME for low or middle rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR1800016116. Protocol Registration Receipt: May 13, 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6537314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65373142019-05-30 Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial You, Xiaolan Wu, Jian Wang, Yuanjie Liu, Qinghong Chen, Dehu Zhao, Xiaojun Zhou, Yan Wu, Xiaoqing Wang, Daorong Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: An inappropriate anastomosis method during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection can increase the risk of anastomotic complications and affect surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of anastomotic complications and the surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes following single versus double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for low rectal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial (the SINGLE–DOUBLE study) will randomly assign middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma patients to receive either single or double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection. Patients will be eligible for inclusion only if they (1) have adenocarcinoma confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy and biopsy, (2) have a tumor situated less than 12 cm from the anal verge, (3) do not have the anal sphincter involved, and (4) do not have distant metastases. The primary endpoint measure will be the incidence of anastomotic complications (leakage, narrowing, and bleeding). The secondary endpoints will be surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. A total of 500 patients will be enrolled in the study. Sample size calculation was based on previous reports and our retrospective analysis. DISCUSSION: This randomized single-center controlled trial is expected to demonstrate which anastomosis method (single or double purse-string anastomosis) is better for reducing complications and improving prognosis in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic TME for low or middle rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR1800016116. Protocol Registration Receipt: May 13, 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6537314/ /pubmed/31138321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol You, Xiaolan Wu, Jian Wang, Yuanjie Liu, Qinghong Chen, Dehu Zhao, Xiaojun Zhou, Yan Wu, Xiaoqing Wang, Daorong Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (single–double trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youxiaolan singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wujian singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangyuanjie singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuqinghong singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chendehu singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhaoxiaojun singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhouyan singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuxiaoqing singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangdaorong singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |