Cargando…

Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: An inappropriate anastomosis method during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection can increase the risk of anastomotic complications and affect surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of anastomotic complications and the surgical, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: You, Xiaolan, Wu, Jian, Wang, Yuanjie, Liu, Qinghong, Chen, Dehu, Zhao, Xiaojun, Zhou, Yan, Wu, Xiaoqing, Wang, Daorong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7
_version_ 1783421985875820544
author You, Xiaolan
Wu, Jian
Wang, Yuanjie
Liu, Qinghong
Chen, Dehu
Zhao, Xiaojun
Zhou, Yan
Wu, Xiaoqing
Wang, Daorong
author_facet You, Xiaolan
Wu, Jian
Wang, Yuanjie
Liu, Qinghong
Chen, Dehu
Zhao, Xiaojun
Zhou, Yan
Wu, Xiaoqing
Wang, Daorong
author_sort You, Xiaolan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An inappropriate anastomosis method during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection can increase the risk of anastomotic complications and affect surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of anastomotic complications and the surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes following single versus double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for low rectal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial (the SINGLE–DOUBLE study) will randomly assign middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma patients to receive either single or double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection. Patients will be eligible for inclusion only if they (1) have adenocarcinoma confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy and biopsy, (2) have a tumor situated less than 12 cm from the anal verge, (3) do not have the anal sphincter involved, and (4) do not have distant metastases. The primary endpoint measure will be the incidence of anastomotic complications (leakage, narrowing, and bleeding). The secondary endpoints will be surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. A total of 500 patients will be enrolled in the study. Sample size calculation was based on previous reports and our retrospective analysis. DISCUSSION: This randomized single-center controlled trial is expected to demonstrate which anastomosis method (single or double purse-string anastomosis) is better for reducing complications and improving prognosis in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic TME for low or middle rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR1800016116. Protocol Registration Receipt: May 13, 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65373142019-05-30 Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial You, Xiaolan Wu, Jian Wang, Yuanjie Liu, Qinghong Chen, Dehu Zhao, Xiaojun Zhou, Yan Wu, Xiaoqing Wang, Daorong Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: An inappropriate anastomosis method during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection can increase the risk of anastomotic complications and affect surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of anastomotic complications and the surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes following single versus double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for low rectal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial (the SINGLE–DOUBLE study) will randomly assign middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma patients to receive either single or double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection. Patients will be eligible for inclusion only if they (1) have adenocarcinoma confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy and biopsy, (2) have a tumor situated less than 12 cm from the anal verge, (3) do not have the anal sphincter involved, and (4) do not have distant metastases. The primary endpoint measure will be the incidence of anastomotic complications (leakage, narrowing, and bleeding). The secondary endpoints will be surgical, economic, and oncological outcomes. A total of 500 patients will be enrolled in the study. Sample size calculation was based on previous reports and our retrospective analysis. DISCUSSION: This randomized single-center controlled trial is expected to demonstrate which anastomosis method (single or double purse-string anastomosis) is better for reducing complications and improving prognosis in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic TME for low or middle rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR1800016116. Protocol Registration Receipt: May 13, 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6537314/ /pubmed/31138321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
You, Xiaolan
Wu, Jian
Wang, Yuanjie
Liu, Qinghong
Chen, Dehu
Zhao, Xiaojun
Zhou, Yan
Wu, Xiaoqing
Wang, Daorong
Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (SINGLE–DOUBLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort single vs. double purse-string anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection (single–double trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3411-7
work_keys_str_mv AT youxiaolan singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wujian singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangyuanjie singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuqinghong singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chendehu singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhaoxiaojun singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhouyan singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuxiaoqing singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangdaorong singlevsdoublepursestringanastomosisduringlaparoscopiclowanteriorrectalresectionsingledoubletrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial