Cargando…

Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study

BACKGROUND: Patients with palpitations and pre-syncope commonly present to Emergency Departments (EDs) but underlying rhythm diagnosis is often not possible during the initial presentation. This trial compares the symptomatic rhythm detection rate of a smartphone-based event recorder (AliveCor) alon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reed, Matthew J., Grubb, Neil R., Lang, Christopher C., O'Brien, Rachel, Simpson, Kirsty, Padarenga, Mia, Grant, Alison, Tuck, Sharon, Keating, Liza, Coffey, Frank, Jones, Lucy, Harris, Tim, Lloyd, Gavin, Gagg, James, Smith, Jason E., Coats, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.02.005
_version_ 1783422040072519680
author Reed, Matthew J.
Grubb, Neil R.
Lang, Christopher C.
O'Brien, Rachel
Simpson, Kirsty
Padarenga, Mia
Grant, Alison
Tuck, Sharon
Keating, Liza
Coffey, Frank
Jones, Lucy
Harris, Tim
Lloyd, Gavin
Gagg, James
Smith, Jason E.
Coats, Tim
author_facet Reed, Matthew J.
Grubb, Neil R.
Lang, Christopher C.
O'Brien, Rachel
Simpson, Kirsty
Padarenga, Mia
Grant, Alison
Tuck, Sharon
Keating, Liza
Coffey, Frank
Jones, Lucy
Harris, Tim
Lloyd, Gavin
Gagg, James
Smith, Jason E.
Coats, Tim
author_sort Reed, Matthew J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with palpitations and pre-syncope commonly present to Emergency Departments (EDs) but underlying rhythm diagnosis is often not possible during the initial presentation. This trial compares the symptomatic rhythm detection rate of a smartphone-based event recorder (AliveCor) alongside standard care versus standard care alone, for participants presenting to the ED with palpitations and pre-syncope with no obvious cause evident at initial consultation. METHODS: Multi-centre open label, randomised controlled trial. Participants ≥ 16 years old presenting to 10 UK hospital EDs were included. Participants were randomised to either (a) intervention group; standard care plus the use of a smartphone-based event recorder or (b) control group; standard care alone. Primary endpoint was symptomatic rhythm detection rate at 90 days. Trial registration number NCT02783898 (ClinicalTrials.gov). FINDINGS: Two hundred forty-three participants were recruited over an 18-month period. A symptomatic rhythm was detected at 90 days in 69 (n = 124; 55.6%; 95% CI 46.9–64.4%) participants in the intervention group versus 11 (n = 116; 9.5%; 95% CI 4.2–14.8) in the control group (RR 5.9, 95% CI 3.3–10.5; p < 0.0001). Mean time to symptomatic rhythm detection in the intervention group was 9.5 days (SD 16.1, range 0–83) versus 42.9 days (SD 16.0, range 12–66; p < 0.0001) in the control group. The commonest symptomatic rhythms detected were sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia and ectopic beats. A symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia was detected at 90 days in 11 (n = 124; 8.9%; 95% CI 3.9–13.9%) participants in the intervention group versus 1 (n = 116; 0.9%; 95% CI 0.0–2.5%) in the control group (RR 10.3, 95% CI 1.3–78.5; p = 0.006). INTERPRETATION: Use of a smartphone-based event recorder increased the number of patients in whom an ECG was captured during symptoms over five-fold to more than 55% at 90 days. This safe, non-invasive and easy to use device should be considered part of on-going care to all patients presenting acutely with unexplained palpitations or pre-syncope. FUNDING: This study was funded by research awards from Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland (CHSS) and British Heart Foundation (BHF) which included funding for purchasing the devices. MR was supported by an NHS Research Scotland Career Researcher Clinician award.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65375552019-05-29 Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study Reed, Matthew J. Grubb, Neil R. Lang, Christopher C. O'Brien, Rachel Simpson, Kirsty Padarenga, Mia Grant, Alison Tuck, Sharon Keating, Liza Coffey, Frank Jones, Lucy Harris, Tim Lloyd, Gavin Gagg, James Smith, Jason E. Coats, Tim EClinicalMedicine Research Paper BACKGROUND: Patients with palpitations and pre-syncope commonly present to Emergency Departments (EDs) but underlying rhythm diagnosis is often not possible during the initial presentation. This trial compares the symptomatic rhythm detection rate of a smartphone-based event recorder (AliveCor) alongside standard care versus standard care alone, for participants presenting to the ED with palpitations and pre-syncope with no obvious cause evident at initial consultation. METHODS: Multi-centre open label, randomised controlled trial. Participants ≥ 16 years old presenting to 10 UK hospital EDs were included. Participants were randomised to either (a) intervention group; standard care plus the use of a smartphone-based event recorder or (b) control group; standard care alone. Primary endpoint was symptomatic rhythm detection rate at 90 days. Trial registration number NCT02783898 (ClinicalTrials.gov). FINDINGS: Two hundred forty-three participants were recruited over an 18-month period. A symptomatic rhythm was detected at 90 days in 69 (n = 124; 55.6%; 95% CI 46.9–64.4%) participants in the intervention group versus 11 (n = 116; 9.5%; 95% CI 4.2–14.8) in the control group (RR 5.9, 95% CI 3.3–10.5; p < 0.0001). Mean time to symptomatic rhythm detection in the intervention group was 9.5 days (SD 16.1, range 0–83) versus 42.9 days (SD 16.0, range 12–66; p < 0.0001) in the control group. The commonest symptomatic rhythms detected were sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia and ectopic beats. A symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia was detected at 90 days in 11 (n = 124; 8.9%; 95% CI 3.9–13.9%) participants in the intervention group versus 1 (n = 116; 0.9%; 95% CI 0.0–2.5%) in the control group (RR 10.3, 95% CI 1.3–78.5; p = 0.006). INTERPRETATION: Use of a smartphone-based event recorder increased the number of patients in whom an ECG was captured during symptoms over five-fold to more than 55% at 90 days. This safe, non-invasive and easy to use device should be considered part of on-going care to all patients presenting acutely with unexplained palpitations or pre-syncope. FUNDING: This study was funded by research awards from Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland (CHSS) and British Heart Foundation (BHF) which included funding for purchasing the devices. MR was supported by an NHS Research Scotland Career Researcher Clinician award. Elsevier 2019-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6537555/ /pubmed/31193636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.02.005 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Reed, Matthew J.
Grubb, Neil R.
Lang, Christopher C.
O'Brien, Rachel
Simpson, Kirsty
Padarenga, Mia
Grant, Alison
Tuck, Sharon
Keating, Liza
Coffey, Frank
Jones, Lucy
Harris, Tim
Lloyd, Gavin
Gagg, James
Smith, Jason E.
Coats, Tim
Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study
title Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study
title_full Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study
title_fullStr Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study
title_full_unstemmed Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study
title_short Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study
title_sort multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a smartphone-based event recorder alongside standard care versus standard care for patients presenting to the emergency department with palpitations and pre-syncope: the iped (investigation of palpitations in the ed) study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.02.005
work_keys_str_mv AT reedmatthewj multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT grubbneilr multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT langchristopherc multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT obrienrachel multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT simpsonkirsty multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT padarengamia multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT grantalison multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT tucksharon multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT keatingliza multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT coffeyfrank multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT joneslucy multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT harristim multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT lloydgavin multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT gaggjames multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT smithjasone multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy
AT coatstim multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofasmartphonebasedeventrecorderalongsidestandardcareversusstandardcareforpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithpalpitationsandpresyncopetheipedinvestigationofpalpitationsintheedstudy