Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion
IMPORTANCE: Clinician compassion is a vital element of health care quality. Currently, there appears to be no validated and feasible method for health care organizations to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion on a large scale. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool for measuring pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3976 |
_version_ | 1783422087465009152 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Brian W. Roberts, Michael B. Yao, Jady Bosire, Joshua Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen |
author_facet | Roberts, Brian W. Roberts, Michael B. Yao, Jady Bosire, Joshua Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen |
author_sort | Roberts, Brian W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Clinician compassion is a vital element of health care quality. Currently, there appears to be no validated and feasible method for health care organizations to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion on a large scale. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool for measuring patient assessment of clinician compassion that can be used in conjunction with the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) survey. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study took place from June 1 to August 30, 2018, at a US academic health care system among a pilot cohort consisting of 3325 adult patients and a validation cohort consisting of 3483 adult patients, both of whom had an outpatient clinic visit and completed the CG-CAHPS survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASUREMENTS: After a comprehensive literature review, 12 candidate survey items were developed. Face and construct validity were performed. Candidate items were disseminated to patients in conjunction with the CG-CAHPS survey in a series of 2 studies: (1) exploratory factor analysis in one cohort to determine the factor structure and the most parsimonious set of items; and (2) validity testing in a second cohort using confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was tested using Cronbach α. Convergent validity was tested with patient assessment of clinician communication and overall satisfaction questions from CG-CAHPS survey. RESULTS: Overall, 6493 patient responses were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 60 (15) years, 4239 patients (65.3%) were women, and 5079 (78.2%) were white. Exploratory factor analyses identified a 5-item compassion measure to be the most parsimonious. Confirmatory factor analyses found good fit. The compassion measure demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.94) and convergent validity (clinician communication: ρ = 0.44; overall satisfaction: ρ = 0.52) but reflected a patient experience domain (compassionate care) distinct from what is currently captured in the CG-CAHPS survey. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A simple 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion was developed and validated for use in conjunction with CG-CAHPS survey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6537812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65378122019-06-12 Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion Roberts, Brian W. Roberts, Michael B. Yao, Jady Bosire, Joshua Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Clinician compassion is a vital element of health care quality. Currently, there appears to be no validated and feasible method for health care organizations to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion on a large scale. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool for measuring patient assessment of clinician compassion that can be used in conjunction with the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) survey. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study took place from June 1 to August 30, 2018, at a US academic health care system among a pilot cohort consisting of 3325 adult patients and a validation cohort consisting of 3483 adult patients, both of whom had an outpatient clinic visit and completed the CG-CAHPS survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASUREMENTS: After a comprehensive literature review, 12 candidate survey items were developed. Face and construct validity were performed. Candidate items were disseminated to patients in conjunction with the CG-CAHPS survey in a series of 2 studies: (1) exploratory factor analysis in one cohort to determine the factor structure and the most parsimonious set of items; and (2) validity testing in a second cohort using confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was tested using Cronbach α. Convergent validity was tested with patient assessment of clinician communication and overall satisfaction questions from CG-CAHPS survey. RESULTS: Overall, 6493 patient responses were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 60 (15) years, 4239 patients (65.3%) were women, and 5079 (78.2%) were white. Exploratory factor analyses identified a 5-item compassion measure to be the most parsimonious. Confirmatory factor analyses found good fit. The compassion measure demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.94) and convergent validity (clinician communication: ρ = 0.44; overall satisfaction: ρ = 0.52) but reflected a patient experience domain (compassionate care) distinct from what is currently captured in the CG-CAHPS survey. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A simple 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion was developed and validated for use in conjunction with CG-CAHPS survey. American Medical Association 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6537812/ /pubmed/31099870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3976 Text en Copyright 2019 Roberts BW et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Roberts, Brian W. Roberts, Michael B. Yao, Jady Bosire, Joshua Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion |
title | Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion |
title_full | Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion |
title_short | Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion |
title_sort | development and validation of a tool to measure patient assessment of clinical compassion |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsbrianw developmentandvalidationofatooltomeasurepatientassessmentofclinicalcompassion AT robertsmichaelb developmentandvalidationofatooltomeasurepatientassessmentofclinicalcompassion AT yaojady developmentandvalidationofatooltomeasurepatientassessmentofclinicalcompassion AT bosirejoshua developmentandvalidationofatooltomeasurepatientassessmentofclinicalcompassion AT mazzarellianthony developmentandvalidationofatooltomeasurepatientassessmentofclinicalcompassion AT trzeciakstephen developmentandvalidationofatooltomeasurepatientassessmentofclinicalcompassion |