Cargando…

Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification

There is controversy regarding the relative merits of cognitive assessment for the identification of learning disabilities. Proponents of cognitive assessment have suggested that multitiered systems of support (MTSS) should be supplemented with routine, systematic assessment of cognitive processes f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Jacob, Miciak, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31149322
_version_ 1783422093193379840
author Williams, Jacob
Miciak, Jeremy
author_facet Williams, Jacob
Miciak, Jeremy
author_sort Williams, Jacob
collection PubMed
description There is controversy regarding the relative merits of cognitive assessment for the identification of learning disabilities. Proponents of cognitive assessment have suggested that multitiered systems of support (MTSS) should be supplemented with routine, systematic assessment of cognitive processes following a determination of inadequate response to evidence-based interventions in order to document a pattern of processing strengths and weaknesses (PSW methods) as an inclusionary criterion for learning disabilities. However, the financial costs incurred by this addition to MTSS are not well known. In the present study, we present a systematic case study to estimate the costs associated with adopting routine assessment of cognitive processing for students referred for special education evaluation. We estimate that implementation within a district would cost between $1,960 and $2,400 per student, assuming no existing infrastructure. These expenses are discussed in relation to evidence for the educational value of such assessments and inherent trade-offs between assessment and intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65378992019-05-28 Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification Williams, Jacob Miciak, Jeremy Sch Psychol Forum Res Pract Article There is controversy regarding the relative merits of cognitive assessment for the identification of learning disabilities. Proponents of cognitive assessment have suggested that multitiered systems of support (MTSS) should be supplemented with routine, systematic assessment of cognitive processes following a determination of inadequate response to evidence-based interventions in order to document a pattern of processing strengths and weaknesses (PSW methods) as an inclusionary criterion for learning disabilities. However, the financial costs incurred by this addition to MTSS are not well known. In the present study, we present a systematic case study to estimate the costs associated with adopting routine assessment of cognitive processing for students referred for special education evaluation. We estimate that implementation within a district would cost between $1,960 and $2,400 per student, assuming no existing infrastructure. These expenses are discussed in relation to evidence for the educational value of such assessments and inherent trade-offs between assessment and intervention. 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6537899/ /pubmed/31149322 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Copyright of School Psychology Forum is the property of National Association of School Psychologists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
spellingShingle Article
Williams, Jacob
Miciak, Jeremy
Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification
title Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification
title_full Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification
title_fullStr Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification
title_full_unstemmed Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification
title_short Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification
title_sort adoption costs associated with processing strengths and weaknesses methods for learning disabilities identification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31149322
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsjacob adoptioncostsassociatedwithprocessingstrengthsandweaknessesmethodsforlearningdisabilitiesidentification
AT miciakjeremy adoptioncostsassociatedwithprocessingstrengthsandweaknessesmethodsforlearningdisabilitiesidentification