Cargando…
Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review
OBJECTIVE: Frequent users represent a small proportion of emergency department users, but they account for a disproportionately large number of visits. Their use of emergency departments is often considered suboptimal. It would be more efficient to identify and treat those patients earlier in their...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027750 |
_version_ | 1783422105109397504 |
---|---|
author | Chiu, Yohann Racine-Hemmings, François Dufour, Isabelle Vanasse, Alain Chouinard, Maud-Christine Bisson, Mathieu Hudon, Catherine |
author_facet | Chiu, Yohann Racine-Hemmings, François Dufour, Isabelle Vanasse, Alain Chouinard, Maud-Christine Bisson, Mathieu Hudon, Catherine |
author_sort | Chiu, Yohann |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Frequent users represent a small proportion of emergency department users, but they account for a disproportionately large number of visits. Their use of emergency departments is often considered suboptimal. It would be more efficient to identify and treat those patients earlier in their health problem trajectory. It is therefore essential to describe their characteristics and to predict their emergency department use. In order to do so, adequate statistical tools are needed. The objective of this study was to determine the statistical tools used in identifying variables associated with frequent use or predicting the risk of becoming a frequent user. METHODS: We performed a scoping review following an established 5-stage methodological framework. We searched PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL databases in February 2019 using search strategies defined with the help of an information specialist. Out of 4534 potential abstracts, we selected 114 articles based on defined criteria and presented in a content analysis. RESULTS: We identified four classes of statistical tools. Regression models were found to be the most common practice, followed by hypothesis testing. The logistic regression was found to be the most used statistical tool, followed by χ2 test and t-test of associations between variables. Other tools were marginally used. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review lists common statistical tools used for analysing frequent users in emergency departments. It highlights the fact that some are well established while others are much less so. More research is needed to apply appropriate techniques to health data or to diversify statistical point of views. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6537981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65379812019-06-12 Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review Chiu, Yohann Racine-Hemmings, François Dufour, Isabelle Vanasse, Alain Chouinard, Maud-Christine Bisson, Mathieu Hudon, Catherine BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Frequent users represent a small proportion of emergency department users, but they account for a disproportionately large number of visits. Their use of emergency departments is often considered suboptimal. It would be more efficient to identify and treat those patients earlier in their health problem trajectory. It is therefore essential to describe their characteristics and to predict their emergency department use. In order to do so, adequate statistical tools are needed. The objective of this study was to determine the statistical tools used in identifying variables associated with frequent use or predicting the risk of becoming a frequent user. METHODS: We performed a scoping review following an established 5-stage methodological framework. We searched PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL databases in February 2019 using search strategies defined with the help of an information specialist. Out of 4534 potential abstracts, we selected 114 articles based on defined criteria and presented in a content analysis. RESULTS: We identified four classes of statistical tools. Regression models were found to be the most common practice, followed by hypothesis testing. The logistic regression was found to be the most used statistical tool, followed by χ2 test and t-test of associations between variables. Other tools were marginally used. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review lists common statistical tools used for analysing frequent users in emergency departments. It highlights the fact that some are well established while others are much less so. More research is needed to apply appropriate techniques to health data or to diversify statistical point of views. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6537981/ /pubmed/31129592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027750 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Chiu, Yohann Racine-Hemmings, François Dufour, Isabelle Vanasse, Alain Chouinard, Maud-Christine Bisson, Mathieu Hudon, Catherine Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review |
title | Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review |
title_full | Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review |
title_short | Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review |
title_sort | statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027750 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiuyohann statisticaltoolsusedforanalysesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentascopingreview AT racinehemmingsfrancois statisticaltoolsusedforanalysesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentascopingreview AT dufourisabelle statisticaltoolsusedforanalysesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentascopingreview AT vanassealain statisticaltoolsusedforanalysesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentascopingreview AT chouinardmaudchristine statisticaltoolsusedforanalysesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentascopingreview AT bissonmathieu statisticaltoolsusedforanalysesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentascopingreview AT hudoncatherine statisticaltoolsusedforanalysesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentascopingreview |