Cargando…
User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
OBJECTIVE: To user-test a web-based, interactive Option Grid decision aid ‘prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: yes or no?’ to determine its usability, acceptability and feasibility with men of high and low health literacy. DESIGN: A semi-structured interview study. SETTING: Interviews were conduct...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748 |
_version_ | 1783422110301945856 |
---|---|
author | Scalia, Peter Durand, Marie-Anne Faber, Marjan Kremer, J A Song, Julia Elwyn, Glyn |
author_facet | Scalia, Peter Durand, Marie-Anne Faber, Marjan Kremer, J A Song, Julia Elwyn, Glyn |
author_sort | Scalia, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To user-test a web-based, interactive Option Grid decision aid ‘prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: yes or no?’ to determine its usability, acceptability and feasibility with men of high and low health literacy. DESIGN: A semi-structured interview study. SETTING: Interviews were conducted at a senior centre, academic hospital or college library in New Hampshire and Vermont. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals over 45 years of age with no history of prostate cancer who voluntarily contacted study authors after viewing local invitations were eligible for inclusion. Twenty interviews were conducted: 10 participants had not completed a college degree, of which eight had low health literacy, and 10 participants had high health literacy. INTERVENTION: An interactive, web-based Option Grid patient decision aid for considering whether or not to have a PSA test. RESULTS: Users with lower health literacy levels were able to understand the content in the tool but were not able to navigate the Option Grid independent of assistance. The tool was used independently by men with high health literacy. In terms of acceptability, the flow of questions and answers embedded in the tool did not seem intuitive to some users who preferred seeing more risk information related to age and family history. Users envisioned that the tool could be feasibly implemented in clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: Men in our sample with limited health literacy had difficulty navigating the Option Grid, thus suggesting that the tool was not appropriately designed to be usable by all audiences. The information provided in the tool is acceptable, but users preferred to view personalised risk information. Some participants could envision using this tool prior to an encounter in order to facilitate a better dialogue with their clinician. ETHICS APPROVAL: The study received ethical approval from the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (STUDY00030116). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6538002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65380022019-06-12 User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability Scalia, Peter Durand, Marie-Anne Faber, Marjan Kremer, J A Song, Julia Elwyn, Glyn BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To user-test a web-based, interactive Option Grid decision aid ‘prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: yes or no?’ to determine its usability, acceptability and feasibility with men of high and low health literacy. DESIGN: A semi-structured interview study. SETTING: Interviews were conducted at a senior centre, academic hospital or college library in New Hampshire and Vermont. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals over 45 years of age with no history of prostate cancer who voluntarily contacted study authors after viewing local invitations were eligible for inclusion. Twenty interviews were conducted: 10 participants had not completed a college degree, of which eight had low health literacy, and 10 participants had high health literacy. INTERVENTION: An interactive, web-based Option Grid patient decision aid for considering whether or not to have a PSA test. RESULTS: Users with lower health literacy levels were able to understand the content in the tool but were not able to navigate the Option Grid independent of assistance. The tool was used independently by men with high health literacy. In terms of acceptability, the flow of questions and answers embedded in the tool did not seem intuitive to some users who preferred seeing more risk information related to age and family history. Users envisioned that the tool could be feasibly implemented in clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: Men in our sample with limited health literacy had difficulty navigating the Option Grid, thus suggesting that the tool was not appropriately designed to be usable by all audiences. The information provided in the tool is acceptable, but users preferred to view personalised risk information. Some participants could envision using this tool prior to an encounter in order to facilitate a better dialogue with their clinician. ETHICS APPROVAL: The study received ethical approval from the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (STUDY00030116). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6538002/ /pubmed/31133587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Scalia, Peter Durand, Marie-Anne Faber, Marjan Kremer, J A Song, Julia Elwyn, Glyn User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability |
title | User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability |
title_full | User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability |
title_fullStr | User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability |
title_full_unstemmed | User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability |
title_short | User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability |
title_sort | user-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scaliapeter usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability AT durandmarieanne usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability AT fabermarjan usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability AT kremerja usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability AT songjulia usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability AT elwynglyn usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability |