Cargando…

User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability

OBJECTIVE: To user-test a web-based, interactive Option Grid decision aid ‘prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: yes or no?’ to determine its usability, acceptability and feasibility with men of high and low health literacy. DESIGN: A semi-structured interview study. SETTING: Interviews were conduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scalia, Peter, Durand, Marie-Anne, Faber, Marjan, Kremer, J A, Song, Julia, Elwyn, Glyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748
_version_ 1783422110301945856
author Scalia, Peter
Durand, Marie-Anne
Faber, Marjan
Kremer, J A
Song, Julia
Elwyn, Glyn
author_facet Scalia, Peter
Durand, Marie-Anne
Faber, Marjan
Kremer, J A
Song, Julia
Elwyn, Glyn
author_sort Scalia, Peter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To user-test a web-based, interactive Option Grid decision aid ‘prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: yes or no?’ to determine its usability, acceptability and feasibility with men of high and low health literacy. DESIGN: A semi-structured interview study. SETTING: Interviews were conducted at a senior centre, academic hospital or college library in New Hampshire and Vermont. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals over 45 years of age with no history of prostate cancer who voluntarily contacted study authors after viewing local invitations were eligible for inclusion. Twenty interviews were conducted: 10 participants had not completed a college degree, of which eight had low health literacy, and 10 participants had high health literacy. INTERVENTION: An interactive, web-based Option Grid patient decision aid for considering whether or not to have a PSA test. RESULTS: Users with lower health literacy levels were able to understand the content in the tool but were not able to navigate the Option Grid independent of assistance. The tool was used independently by men with high health literacy. In terms of acceptability, the flow of questions and answers embedded in the tool did not seem intuitive to some users who preferred seeing more risk information related to age and family history. Users envisioned that the tool could be feasibly implemented in clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: Men in our sample with limited health literacy had difficulty navigating the Option Grid, thus suggesting that the tool was not appropriately designed to be usable by all audiences. The information provided in the tool is acceptable, but users preferred to view personalised risk information. Some participants could envision using this tool prior to an encounter in order to facilitate a better dialogue with their clinician. ETHICS APPROVAL: The study received ethical approval from the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (STUDY00030116).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6538002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65380022019-06-12 User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability Scalia, Peter Durand, Marie-Anne Faber, Marjan Kremer, J A Song, Julia Elwyn, Glyn BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To user-test a web-based, interactive Option Grid decision aid ‘prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: yes or no?’ to determine its usability, acceptability and feasibility with men of high and low health literacy. DESIGN: A semi-structured interview study. SETTING: Interviews were conducted at a senior centre, academic hospital or college library in New Hampshire and Vermont. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals over 45 years of age with no history of prostate cancer who voluntarily contacted study authors after viewing local invitations were eligible for inclusion. Twenty interviews were conducted: 10 participants had not completed a college degree, of which eight had low health literacy, and 10 participants had high health literacy. INTERVENTION: An interactive, web-based Option Grid patient decision aid for considering whether or not to have a PSA test. RESULTS: Users with lower health literacy levels were able to understand the content in the tool but were not able to navigate the Option Grid independent of assistance. The tool was used independently by men with high health literacy. In terms of acceptability, the flow of questions and answers embedded in the tool did not seem intuitive to some users who preferred seeing more risk information related to age and family history. Users envisioned that the tool could be feasibly implemented in clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: Men in our sample with limited health literacy had difficulty navigating the Option Grid, thus suggesting that the tool was not appropriately designed to be usable by all audiences. The information provided in the tool is acceptable, but users preferred to view personalised risk information. Some participants could envision using this tool prior to an encounter in order to facilitate a better dialogue with their clinician. ETHICS APPROVAL: The study received ethical approval from the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (STUDY00030116). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6538002/ /pubmed/31133587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Scalia, Peter
Durand, Marie-Anne
Faber, Marjan
Kremer, J A
Song, Julia
Elwyn, Glyn
User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
title User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
title_full User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
title_fullStr User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
title_full_unstemmed User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
title_short User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
title_sort user-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748
work_keys_str_mv AT scaliapeter usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability
AT durandmarieanne usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability
AT fabermarjan usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability
AT kremerja usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability
AT songjulia usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability
AT elwynglyn usertestinganinteractiveoptiongriddecisionaidforprostatecancerscreeninglessonstoimproveusability