Cargando…

Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units

OBJECTIVES: Various strategies to promote light sedation are highly recommended in recent guidelines, as deep sedation is associated with suboptimum patient outcomes. Yet, the challenges met by clinicians in delivering high-quality analgosedation is rarely addressed. As part of the evaluation of a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kydonaki, Kalliopi, Hanley, Janet, Huby, Guro, Antonelli, Jean, Walsh, Timothy Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024549
_version_ 1783422117834915840
author Kydonaki, Kalliopi
Hanley, Janet
Huby, Guro
Antonelli, Jean
Walsh, Timothy Simon
author_facet Kydonaki, Kalliopi
Hanley, Janet
Huby, Guro
Antonelli, Jean
Walsh, Timothy Simon
author_sort Kydonaki, Kalliopi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Various strategies to promote light sedation are highly recommended in recent guidelines, as deep sedation is associated with suboptimum patient outcomes. Yet, the challenges met by clinicians in delivering high-quality analgosedation is rarely addressed. As part of the evaluation of a cluster-randomised quality improvement trial in eight Scottish intensive care units (ICUs), we aimed to understand the challenges to optimising sedation in the Scottish ICU settings prior to the trial. This article reports on the findings. DESIGN: A qualitative exploratory design: We conducted focus groups (FG) with clinicians during the preintervention period. Setting and participants: Eight Scottish ICUs. Nurses, physiotherapists and doctors working in each ICU volunteered to participate. FG were recorded and verbatim transcribed and inserted in NVivo V.10 for analysis. Qualitative thematic analysis was undertaken to develop emergent themes from the patterns identified in relation to sedation practice. Ethical approval was secured by Scotland A Research ethics committee. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the inductive analysis: (a) a recent shift in sedation practice, (b) uncertainty in decision-making and (c) system-level factors including the ICU environment, organisational factors and educational gaps. Clinicians were challenged daily to manage agitated or difficult-to-sedate patients in the era of a progressive mantra of ‘just sedate less’ imposed by the pain–agitation–delirium guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The current implementation of guidelines does not support behaviour change strategies to allow a patient-focused approach to sedation management, which obstructs optimum sedation–analgesia management. Recognition of the various challenges when mandating less sedation needs to be considered and novel sedation–analgesia strategies should allow a system-level approach to improve sedation–analgesia quality. DESIST REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01634451
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6538047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65380472019-06-12 Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units Kydonaki, Kalliopi Hanley, Janet Huby, Guro Antonelli, Jean Walsh, Timothy Simon BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: Various strategies to promote light sedation are highly recommended in recent guidelines, as deep sedation is associated with suboptimum patient outcomes. Yet, the challenges met by clinicians in delivering high-quality analgosedation is rarely addressed. As part of the evaluation of a cluster-randomised quality improvement trial in eight Scottish intensive care units (ICUs), we aimed to understand the challenges to optimising sedation in the Scottish ICU settings prior to the trial. This article reports on the findings. DESIGN: A qualitative exploratory design: We conducted focus groups (FG) with clinicians during the preintervention period. Setting and participants: Eight Scottish ICUs. Nurses, physiotherapists and doctors working in each ICU volunteered to participate. FG were recorded and verbatim transcribed and inserted in NVivo V.10 for analysis. Qualitative thematic analysis was undertaken to develop emergent themes from the patterns identified in relation to sedation practice. Ethical approval was secured by Scotland A Research ethics committee. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the inductive analysis: (a) a recent shift in sedation practice, (b) uncertainty in decision-making and (c) system-level factors including the ICU environment, organisational factors and educational gaps. Clinicians were challenged daily to manage agitated or difficult-to-sedate patients in the era of a progressive mantra of ‘just sedate less’ imposed by the pain–agitation–delirium guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The current implementation of guidelines does not support behaviour change strategies to allow a patient-focused approach to sedation management, which obstructs optimum sedation–analgesia management. Recognition of the various challenges when mandating less sedation needs to be considered and novel sedation–analgesia strategies should allow a system-level approach to improve sedation–analgesia quality. DESIST REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01634451 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6538047/ /pubmed/31129576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024549 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Kydonaki, Kalliopi
Hanley, Janet
Huby, Guro
Antonelli, Jean
Walsh, Timothy Simon
Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units
title Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units
title_full Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units
title_fullStr Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units
title_short Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units
title_sort challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight scottish intensive care units
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024549
work_keys_str_mv AT kydonakikalliopi challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits
AT hanleyjanet challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits
AT hubyguro challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits
AT antonellijean challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits
AT walshtimothysimon challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits