Cargando…
Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units
OBJECTIVES: Various strategies to promote light sedation are highly recommended in recent guidelines, as deep sedation is associated with suboptimum patient outcomes. Yet, the challenges met by clinicians in delivering high-quality analgosedation is rarely addressed. As part of the evaluation of a c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024549 |
_version_ | 1783422117834915840 |
---|---|
author | Kydonaki, Kalliopi Hanley, Janet Huby, Guro Antonelli, Jean Walsh, Timothy Simon |
author_facet | Kydonaki, Kalliopi Hanley, Janet Huby, Guro Antonelli, Jean Walsh, Timothy Simon |
author_sort | Kydonaki, Kalliopi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Various strategies to promote light sedation are highly recommended in recent guidelines, as deep sedation is associated with suboptimum patient outcomes. Yet, the challenges met by clinicians in delivering high-quality analgosedation is rarely addressed. As part of the evaluation of a cluster-randomised quality improvement trial in eight Scottish intensive care units (ICUs), we aimed to understand the challenges to optimising sedation in the Scottish ICU settings prior to the trial. This article reports on the findings. DESIGN: A qualitative exploratory design: We conducted focus groups (FG) with clinicians during the preintervention period. Setting and participants: Eight Scottish ICUs. Nurses, physiotherapists and doctors working in each ICU volunteered to participate. FG were recorded and verbatim transcribed and inserted in NVivo V.10 for analysis. Qualitative thematic analysis was undertaken to develop emergent themes from the patterns identified in relation to sedation practice. Ethical approval was secured by Scotland A Research ethics committee. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the inductive analysis: (a) a recent shift in sedation practice, (b) uncertainty in decision-making and (c) system-level factors including the ICU environment, organisational factors and educational gaps. Clinicians were challenged daily to manage agitated or difficult-to-sedate patients in the era of a progressive mantra of ‘just sedate less’ imposed by the pain–agitation–delirium guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The current implementation of guidelines does not support behaviour change strategies to allow a patient-focused approach to sedation management, which obstructs optimum sedation–analgesia management. Recognition of the various challenges when mandating less sedation needs to be considered and novel sedation–analgesia strategies should allow a system-level approach to improve sedation–analgesia quality. DESIST REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01634451 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6538047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65380472019-06-12 Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units Kydonaki, Kalliopi Hanley, Janet Huby, Guro Antonelli, Jean Walsh, Timothy Simon BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: Various strategies to promote light sedation are highly recommended in recent guidelines, as deep sedation is associated with suboptimum patient outcomes. Yet, the challenges met by clinicians in delivering high-quality analgosedation is rarely addressed. As part of the evaluation of a cluster-randomised quality improvement trial in eight Scottish intensive care units (ICUs), we aimed to understand the challenges to optimising sedation in the Scottish ICU settings prior to the trial. This article reports on the findings. DESIGN: A qualitative exploratory design: We conducted focus groups (FG) with clinicians during the preintervention period. Setting and participants: Eight Scottish ICUs. Nurses, physiotherapists and doctors working in each ICU volunteered to participate. FG were recorded and verbatim transcribed and inserted in NVivo V.10 for analysis. Qualitative thematic analysis was undertaken to develop emergent themes from the patterns identified in relation to sedation practice. Ethical approval was secured by Scotland A Research ethics committee. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the inductive analysis: (a) a recent shift in sedation practice, (b) uncertainty in decision-making and (c) system-level factors including the ICU environment, organisational factors and educational gaps. Clinicians were challenged daily to manage agitated or difficult-to-sedate patients in the era of a progressive mantra of ‘just sedate less’ imposed by the pain–agitation–delirium guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The current implementation of guidelines does not support behaviour change strategies to allow a patient-focused approach to sedation management, which obstructs optimum sedation–analgesia management. Recognition of the various challenges when mandating less sedation needs to be considered and novel sedation–analgesia strategies should allow a system-level approach to improve sedation–analgesia quality. DESIST REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01634451 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6538047/ /pubmed/31129576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024549 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Kydonaki, Kalliopi Hanley, Janet Huby, Guro Antonelli, Jean Walsh, Timothy Simon Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units |
title | Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units |
title_full | Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units |
title_fullStr | Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units |
title_short | Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units |
title_sort | challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight scottish intensive care units |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024549 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kydonakikalliopi challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits AT hanleyjanet challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits AT hubyguro challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits AT antonellijean challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits AT walshtimothysimon challengesandbarrierstooptimisingsedationinintensivecareaqualitativestudyineightscottishintensivecareunits |