Cargando…
Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study
INTRODUCTION: There is a lot of speculation about why and how patients decide to use invasive treatment in an advanced stage of cancer, but the body of research is limited. The present longitudinal qualitative and quantitative study reflects real-life practice of pixantrone use and aims to collect d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026505 |
_version_ | 1783422119380516864 |
---|---|
author | van Hoogdalem, Lothar E Siemes, Claire Lugtenburg, Pieternella J Busschbach, Jan J V Ismail, Sohal Y |
author_facet | van Hoogdalem, Lothar E Siemes, Claire Lugtenburg, Pieternella J Busschbach, Jan J V Ismail, Sohal Y |
author_sort | van Hoogdalem, Lothar E |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is a lot of speculation about why and how patients decide to use invasive treatment in an advanced stage of cancer, but the body of research is limited. The present longitudinal qualitative and quantitative study reflects real-life practice of pixantrone use and aims to collect data on patients’ considerations for, expectations of and experiences with pixantrone and trajectories in their quality-of-life (QoL) values in a Dutch clinical setting. Hence, two questions emerge. Why do patients choose for this treatment, while the treatment success rate is limited and curation cannot be achieved? And second, once chosen, what conditions would patients like to satisfy and how do they experience the treatment? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a non-interventional longitudinal and multicentre study. Patients are eligible if they are >18 years, have never been treated with pixantrone before, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≤2, have a relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and have been treated with at least two prior regimens. The decision to treat patients with pixantrone has been taken by the treating physician before patients are asked to participate in the study. If patients refuse study participation after being informed by the investigator, reasons for refusal (if given) will be recorded. Participants will receive at least three interviews accompanied by three QOL questionnaires. Based on the required sample size, we aim to include 20 patients over a period of 2 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethical Committee of Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, has approved this study. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and major international conferences. The study is non-interventional and falls therefore not under Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (In Dutch: Wet medisch-wetenschappelijk onderzoek met mensen; WMO). Hence, this study is approved to be carried out in the Erasmus MC. Each other participating centre will receive this approval and will separately undergo the ethical approval to be able to participate. In addition to the ethical approval, the participating centres need to obtain written informed consent of their patients. Given the non-interventional nature of this study, a study registration was considered but deemed unnecessary. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Tokyo, Venice, Hong Kong and Somerset West amendments). A sequential identification number will be automatically attributed to each patient that has given consent to participate in the study. This number will identify the patient and must be included on all documents. Only the main researcher can link the code to the patient’s identity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6538055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65380552019-06-12 Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study van Hoogdalem, Lothar E Siemes, Claire Lugtenburg, Pieternella J Busschbach, Jan J V Ismail, Sohal Y BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: There is a lot of speculation about why and how patients decide to use invasive treatment in an advanced stage of cancer, but the body of research is limited. The present longitudinal qualitative and quantitative study reflects real-life practice of pixantrone use and aims to collect data on patients’ considerations for, expectations of and experiences with pixantrone and trajectories in their quality-of-life (QoL) values in a Dutch clinical setting. Hence, two questions emerge. Why do patients choose for this treatment, while the treatment success rate is limited and curation cannot be achieved? And second, once chosen, what conditions would patients like to satisfy and how do they experience the treatment? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a non-interventional longitudinal and multicentre study. Patients are eligible if they are >18 years, have never been treated with pixantrone before, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≤2, have a relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and have been treated with at least two prior regimens. The decision to treat patients with pixantrone has been taken by the treating physician before patients are asked to participate in the study. If patients refuse study participation after being informed by the investigator, reasons for refusal (if given) will be recorded. Participants will receive at least three interviews accompanied by three QOL questionnaires. Based on the required sample size, we aim to include 20 patients over a period of 2 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethical Committee of Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, has approved this study. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and major international conferences. The study is non-interventional and falls therefore not under Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (In Dutch: Wet medisch-wetenschappelijk onderzoek met mensen; WMO). Hence, this study is approved to be carried out in the Erasmus MC. Each other participating centre will receive this approval and will separately undergo the ethical approval to be able to participate. In addition to the ethical approval, the participating centres need to obtain written informed consent of their patients. Given the non-interventional nature of this study, a study registration was considered but deemed unnecessary. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Tokyo, Venice, Hong Kong and Somerset West amendments). A sequential identification number will be automatically attributed to each patient that has given consent to participate in the study. This number will identify the patient and must be included on all documents. Only the main researcher can link the code to the patient’s identity. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6538055/ /pubmed/31122976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026505 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research van Hoogdalem, Lothar E Siemes, Claire Lugtenburg, Pieternella J Busschbach, Jan J V Ismail, Sohal Y Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study |
title | Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study |
title_full | Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study |
title_short | Patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study |
title_sort | patients’ decision-making, experiences and preferences regarding pixantrone treatment in relapsed or refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: study protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhoogdalemlothare patientsdecisionmakingexperiencesandpreferencesregardingpixantronetreatmentinrelapsedorrefractorydiffuselargebcelllymphomastudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy AT siemesclaire patientsdecisionmakingexperiencesandpreferencesregardingpixantronetreatmentinrelapsedorrefractorydiffuselargebcelllymphomastudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy AT lugtenburgpieternellaj patientsdecisionmakingexperiencesandpreferencesregardingpixantronetreatmentinrelapsedorrefractorydiffuselargebcelllymphomastudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy AT busschbachjanjv patientsdecisionmakingexperiencesandpreferencesregardingpixantronetreatmentinrelapsedorrefractorydiffuselargebcelllymphomastudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy AT ismailsohaly patientsdecisionmakingexperiencesandpreferencesregardingpixantronetreatmentinrelapsedorrefractorydiffuselargebcelllymphomastudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy |