Cargando…
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3 |
_version_ | 1783422193918541824 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Graham G. Keitel, Anne Becirspahic, Marc Yao, Bo Sereno, Sara C. |
author_facet | Scott, Graham G. Keitel, Anne Becirspahic, Marc Yao, Bo Sereno, Sara C. |
author_sort | Scott, Graham G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions—semantic size and gender association—are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82% of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource—in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6538586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65385862019-06-12 The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales Scott, Graham G. Keitel, Anne Becirspahic, Marc Yao, Bo Sereno, Sara C. Behav Res Methods Article The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions—semantic size and gender association—are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82% of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource—in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-09-11 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6538586/ /pubmed/30206797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Scott, Graham G. Keitel, Anne Becirspahic, Marc Yao, Bo Sereno, Sara C. The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales |
title | The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales |
title_full | The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales |
title_fullStr | The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales |
title_full_unstemmed | The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales |
title_short | The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales |
title_sort | glasgow norms: ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottgrahamg theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT keitelanne theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT becirspahicmarc theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT yaobo theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT serenosarac theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT scottgrahamg glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT keitelanne glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT becirspahicmarc glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT yaobo glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales AT serenosarac glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales |