Cargando…

The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales

The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Graham G., Keitel, Anne, Becirspahic, Marc, Yao, Bo, Sereno, Sara C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3
_version_ 1783422193918541824
author Scott, Graham G.
Keitel, Anne
Becirspahic, Marc
Yao, Bo
Sereno, Sara C.
author_facet Scott, Graham G.
Keitel, Anne
Becirspahic, Marc
Yao, Bo
Sereno, Sara C.
author_sort Scott, Graham G.
collection PubMed
description The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions—semantic size and gender association—are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82% of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource—in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6538586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65385862019-06-12 The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales Scott, Graham G. Keitel, Anne Becirspahic, Marc Yao, Bo Sereno, Sara C. Behav Res Methods Article The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions—semantic size and gender association—are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82% of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource—in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-09-11 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6538586/ /pubmed/30206797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Scott, Graham G.
Keitel, Anne
Becirspahic, Marc
Yao, Bo
Sereno, Sara C.
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
title The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
title_full The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
title_fullStr The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
title_full_unstemmed The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
title_short The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
title_sort glasgow norms: ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6538586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3
work_keys_str_mv AT scottgrahamg theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT keitelanne theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT becirspahicmarc theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT yaobo theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT serenosarac theglasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT scottgrahamg glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT keitelanne glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT becirspahicmarc glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT yaobo glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales
AT serenosarac glasgownormsratingsof5500wordsonninescales