Cargando…

Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

The feasibility of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) to detect chlorogenic acid, luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid in Chrysanthemum was investigated. An NIR spectroradiometer was applied for data acquisition. The reference values of chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Zhengyan, Sun, Yiming, Cai, Chengyong, He, Yong, Nie, Pengcheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19091981
_version_ 1783422293252243456
author Xia, Zhengyan
Sun, Yiming
Cai, Chengyong
He, Yong
Nie, Pengcheng
author_facet Xia, Zhengyan
Sun, Yiming
Cai, Chengyong
He, Yong
Nie, Pengcheng
author_sort Xia, Zhengyan
collection PubMed
description The feasibility of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) to detect chlorogenic acid, luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid in Chrysanthemum was investigated. An NIR spectroradiometer was applied for data acquisition. The reference values of chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid of the samples were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and were used for model calibration. The results of six preprocessing methods were compared. To reduce input variables and collinearity problems, three methods for variable selection were compared, including successive projections algorithm (SPA), genetic algorithm-partial least squares regression (GA-PLS), and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS). The selected variables were employed as the inputs of partial least square (PLS), back propagation-artificial neural networks (BP-ANN), and extreme learning machine (ELM) models. The best performance was achieved by BP-ANN models based on variables selected by CARS for all three chemical constituents. The values of r(p)(2) (correlation coefficient of prediction) were 0.924, 0.927, 0.933, the values of RMSEP were 0.033, 0.018, 0.064 and the values of RPD were 3.667, 3.667, 2.891 for chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid, respectively. The results indicated that NIR spectroscopy combined with variables selection and multivariate calibration methods could be considered as a useful tool for rapid determination of chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid in Chrysanthemum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6539050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65390502019-06-04 Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Xia, Zhengyan Sun, Yiming Cai, Chengyong He, Yong Nie, Pengcheng Sensors (Basel) Article The feasibility of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) to detect chlorogenic acid, luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid in Chrysanthemum was investigated. An NIR spectroradiometer was applied for data acquisition. The reference values of chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid of the samples were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and were used for model calibration. The results of six preprocessing methods were compared. To reduce input variables and collinearity problems, three methods for variable selection were compared, including successive projections algorithm (SPA), genetic algorithm-partial least squares regression (GA-PLS), and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS). The selected variables were employed as the inputs of partial least square (PLS), back propagation-artificial neural networks (BP-ANN), and extreme learning machine (ELM) models. The best performance was achieved by BP-ANN models based on variables selected by CARS for all three chemical constituents. The values of r(p)(2) (correlation coefficient of prediction) were 0.924, 0.927, 0.933, the values of RMSEP were 0.033, 0.018, 0.064 and the values of RPD were 3.667, 3.667, 2.891 for chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid, respectively. The results indicated that NIR spectroscopy combined with variables selection and multivariate calibration methods could be considered as a useful tool for rapid determination of chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid in Chrysanthemum. MDPI 2019-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6539050/ /pubmed/31035325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19091981 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xia, Zhengyan
Sun, Yiming
Cai, Chengyong
He, Yong
Nie, Pengcheng
Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
title Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
title_full Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
title_fullStr Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
title_short Rapid Determination of Chlorogenic Acid, Luteoloside and 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic Acid in Chrysanthemum Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
title_sort rapid determination of chlorogenic acid, luteoloside and 3,5-o-dicaffeoylquinic acid in chrysanthemum using near-infrared spectroscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19091981
work_keys_str_mv AT xiazhengyan rapiddeterminationofchlorogenicacidluteolosideand35odicaffeoylquinicacidinchrysanthemumusingnearinfraredspectroscopy
AT sunyiming rapiddeterminationofchlorogenicacidluteolosideand35odicaffeoylquinicacidinchrysanthemumusingnearinfraredspectroscopy
AT caichengyong rapiddeterminationofchlorogenicacidluteolosideand35odicaffeoylquinicacidinchrysanthemumusingnearinfraredspectroscopy
AT heyong rapiddeterminationofchlorogenicacidluteolosideand35odicaffeoylquinicacidinchrysanthemumusingnearinfraredspectroscopy
AT niepengcheng rapiddeterminationofchlorogenicacidluteolosideand35odicaffeoylquinicacidinchrysanthemumusingnearinfraredspectroscopy