Cargando…

Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling

Accurate radio frequency (RF)-based indoor localization systems are more and more applied during sports. The most accurate RF-based localization systems use ultra-wideband (UWB) technology; this is why this technology is the most prevalent. UWB positioning systems allow for an in-depth analysis of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minne, Kevin, Macoir, Nicola, Rossey, Jen, Van den Brande, Quinten, Lemey, Sam, Hoebeke, Jeroen, De Poorter, Eli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19092041
_version_ 1783422304559038464
author Minne, Kevin
Macoir, Nicola
Rossey, Jen
Van den Brande, Quinten
Lemey, Sam
Hoebeke, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
author_facet Minne, Kevin
Macoir, Nicola
Rossey, Jen
Van den Brande, Quinten
Lemey, Sam
Hoebeke, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
author_sort Minne, Kevin
collection PubMed
description Accurate radio frequency (RF)-based indoor localization systems are more and more applied during sports. The most accurate RF-based localization systems use ultra-wideband (UWB) technology; this is why this technology is the most prevalent. UWB positioning systems allow for an in-depth analysis of the performance of athletes during training and competition. There is no research available that investigates the feasibility of UWB technology for indoor track cycling. In this paper, we investigate the optimal position to mount the UWB hardware for that specific use case. Different positions on the bicycle and cyclist were evaluated based on accuracy, received power level, line-of-sight, maximum communication range, and comfort. Next to this, the energy consumption of our UWB system was evaluated. We found that the optimal hardware position was the lower back, with a median ranging error of 22 cm (infrastructure hardware placed at 2.3 m). The energy consumption of our UWB system is also taken into account. Applied to our setup with the hardware mounted at the lower back, the maximum communication range varies between 32.6 m and 43.8 m. This shows that UWB localization systems are suitable for indoor positioning of track cyclists. Dataset: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fkhfjfspkr.1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6539095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65390952019-06-04 Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling Minne, Kevin Macoir, Nicola Rossey, Jen Van den Brande, Quinten Lemey, Sam Hoebeke, Jeroen De Poorter, Eli Sensors (Basel) Article Accurate radio frequency (RF)-based indoor localization systems are more and more applied during sports. The most accurate RF-based localization systems use ultra-wideband (UWB) technology; this is why this technology is the most prevalent. UWB positioning systems allow for an in-depth analysis of the performance of athletes during training and competition. There is no research available that investigates the feasibility of UWB technology for indoor track cycling. In this paper, we investigate the optimal position to mount the UWB hardware for that specific use case. Different positions on the bicycle and cyclist were evaluated based on accuracy, received power level, line-of-sight, maximum communication range, and comfort. Next to this, the energy consumption of our UWB system was evaluated. We found that the optimal hardware position was the lower back, with a median ranging error of 22 cm (infrastructure hardware placed at 2.3 m). The energy consumption of our UWB system is also taken into account. Applied to our setup with the hardware mounted at the lower back, the maximum communication range varies between 32.6 m and 43.8 m. This shows that UWB localization systems are suitable for indoor positioning of track cyclists. Dataset: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fkhfjfspkr.1 MDPI 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6539095/ /pubmed/31052378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19092041 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Minne, Kevin
Macoir, Nicola
Rossey, Jen
Van den Brande, Quinten
Lemey, Sam
Hoebeke, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling
title Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling
title_full Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling
title_fullStr Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling
title_short Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Indoor Track Cycling
title_sort experimental evaluation of uwb indoor positioning for indoor track cycling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19092041
work_keys_str_mv AT minnekevin experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforindoortrackcycling
AT macoirnicola experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforindoortrackcycling
AT rosseyjen experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforindoortrackcycling
AT vandenbrandequinten experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforindoortrackcycling
AT lemeysam experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforindoortrackcycling
AT hoebekejeroen experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforindoortrackcycling
AT depoortereli experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforindoortrackcycling