Cargando…

Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending

According to ANSYS software and an electron probe experiment, a multi-layer finite element model (FEM) of pulsed laser bending of stainless steel-carbon steel laminated plate (SCLP) including interfaces has been established. Compared with a single-layer stainless steel plate (SLSP), based on a tempe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zihui, Wang, Xuyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052219
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12091410
_version_ 1783422423206461440
author Li, Zihui
Wang, Xuyue
author_facet Li, Zihui
Wang, Xuyue
author_sort Li, Zihui
collection PubMed
description According to ANSYS software and an electron probe experiment, a multi-layer finite element model (FEM) of pulsed laser bending of stainless steel-carbon steel laminated plate (SCLP) including interfaces has been established. Compared with a single-layer stainless steel plate (SLSP), based on a temperature gradient mechanism considering the depth of the plastic zone, the influence of the interfaces and carbon steel layer in the model of the SCLP on the bending angle has been studied by analyzing the distributions of the temperature field, stress field and strain field in the thickness direction. The simulation results show that the temperature of the SCLP in the thickness direction is lower than that of the SLSP due to interfacial thermal resistance of the interface and fast heat conduction of the carbon steel layer, resulting in a smaller depth of the plastic zone of the SCLP defined by the recrystallization temperature. Affected by the temperature distribution, the plastic stress and strain of the SCLP in the plastic zone are smaller than those of the SLSP, leading to a smaller bending angle of the SCLP. When the laser power is 140 W, the scanning speed is 400 mm/min, the defocus distance is 10 mm, and the scanning time is 1, the bending angle of the SCLP is 1.336°, which is smaller than the bending angle 1.760° of the SLSP. The experimental verifications show that the maximum error of the bending angle is 3.74%, which verifies that the model of laser bending is usable and contributes to refining the laser bending mechanism of the SCLP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6539578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65395782019-06-05 Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending Li, Zihui Wang, Xuyue Materials (Basel) Article According to ANSYS software and an electron probe experiment, a multi-layer finite element model (FEM) of pulsed laser bending of stainless steel-carbon steel laminated plate (SCLP) including interfaces has been established. Compared with a single-layer stainless steel plate (SLSP), based on a temperature gradient mechanism considering the depth of the plastic zone, the influence of the interfaces and carbon steel layer in the model of the SCLP on the bending angle has been studied by analyzing the distributions of the temperature field, stress field and strain field in the thickness direction. The simulation results show that the temperature of the SCLP in the thickness direction is lower than that of the SLSP due to interfacial thermal resistance of the interface and fast heat conduction of the carbon steel layer, resulting in a smaller depth of the plastic zone of the SCLP defined by the recrystallization temperature. Affected by the temperature distribution, the plastic stress and strain of the SCLP in the plastic zone are smaller than those of the SLSP, leading to a smaller bending angle of the SCLP. When the laser power is 140 W, the scanning speed is 400 mm/min, the defocus distance is 10 mm, and the scanning time is 1, the bending angle of the SCLP is 1.336°, which is smaller than the bending angle 1.760° of the SLSP. The experimental verifications show that the maximum error of the bending angle is 3.74%, which verifies that the model of laser bending is usable and contributes to refining the laser bending mechanism of the SCLP. MDPI 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6539578/ /pubmed/31052219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12091410 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Zihui
Wang, Xuyue
Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending
title Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending
title_full Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending
title_fullStr Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending
title_short Numerical Simulation of Stainless Steel-Carbon Steel Laminated Plate Considering Interface in Pulsed Laser Bending
title_sort numerical simulation of stainless steel-carbon steel laminated plate considering interface in pulsed laser bending
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052219
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12091410
work_keys_str_mv AT lizihui numericalsimulationofstainlesssteelcarbonsteellaminatedplateconsideringinterfaceinpulsedlaserbending
AT wangxuyue numericalsimulationofstainlesssteelcarbonsteellaminatedplateconsideringinterfaceinpulsedlaserbending