Cargando…

Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates

Samples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amaro, Ana M., Neto, Maria A., Cirne, José S., Reis, Paulo N.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12091428
_version_ 1783422471168327680
author Amaro, Ana M.
Neto, Maria A.
Cirne, José S.
Reis, Paulo N.B.
author_facet Amaro, Ana M.
Neto, Maria A.
Cirne, José S.
Reis, Paulo N.B.
author_sort Amaro, Ana M.
collection PubMed
description Samples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes having the same nominal composition were also prepared with the same technique, with nominal relative densities of 20% and similar arrangements (US and DS). Impact tests at different velocities were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). It is possible to conclude that Al6082-T4 foams have better performance, in both configurations, than the AlSi12 ones. Considering a uniform cell structure and a density of 20%, the absorbed energy by the Al6082-T4 foams was around 25% higher than the value observed for the AlSi12 ones. In terms of arrangement, the US structure presents absorbed energy around 57% lower than the DS ones, while the AlSi12 foams with a relative density of 20% were compared. Finally, the absorbed energy growths from 2.8 × 10(5) to 5.2 × 10(5) J/m(3), when the density increased from 20% to 60%. However, when these foams were involved with a tube, the performances increased substantially.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6539786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65397862019-06-05 Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates Amaro, Ana M. Neto, Maria A. Cirne, José S. Reis, Paulo N.B. Materials (Basel) Article Samples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes having the same nominal composition were also prepared with the same technique, with nominal relative densities of 20% and similar arrangements (US and DS). Impact tests at different velocities were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). It is possible to conclude that Al6082-T4 foams have better performance, in both configurations, than the AlSi12 ones. Considering a uniform cell structure and a density of 20%, the absorbed energy by the Al6082-T4 foams was around 25% higher than the value observed for the AlSi12 ones. In terms of arrangement, the US structure presents absorbed energy around 57% lower than the DS ones, while the AlSi12 foams with a relative density of 20% were compared. Finally, the absorbed energy growths from 2.8 × 10(5) to 5.2 × 10(5) J/m(3), when the density increased from 20% to 60%. However, when these foams were involved with a tube, the performances increased substantially. MDPI 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6539786/ /pubmed/31052456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12091428 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Amaro, Ana M.
Neto, Maria A.
Cirne, José S.
Reis, Paulo N.B.
Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_full Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_fullStr Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_short Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_sort mechanical characterization of different aluminium foams at high strain rates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12091428
work_keys_str_mv AT amaroanam mechanicalcharacterizationofdifferentaluminiumfoamsathighstrainrates
AT netomariaa mechanicalcharacterizationofdifferentaluminiumfoamsathighstrainrates
AT cirnejoses mechanicalcharacterizationofdifferentaluminiumfoamsathighstrainrates
AT reispaulonb mechanicalcharacterizationofdifferentaluminiumfoamsathighstrainrates