Cargando…
How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity?
Researchers investigating relationships between the neighbourhood environment and health first need to decide on the spatial extent of the neighbourhood they are interested in. This decision is an important and ongoing methodological challenge since different methods of defining and delineating neig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091501 |
_version_ | 1783422553419677696 |
---|---|
author | Mavoa, Suzanne Bagheri, Nasser Koohsari, Mohammad Javad Kaczynski, Andrew T. Lamb, Karen E. Oka, Koichiro O’Sullivan, David Witten, Karen |
author_facet | Mavoa, Suzanne Bagheri, Nasser Koohsari, Mohammad Javad Kaczynski, Andrew T. Lamb, Karen E. Oka, Koichiro O’Sullivan, David Witten, Karen |
author_sort | Mavoa, Suzanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Researchers investigating relationships between the neighbourhood environment and health first need to decide on the spatial extent of the neighbourhood they are interested in. This decision is an important and ongoing methodological challenge since different methods of defining and delineating neighbourhood boundaries can produce different results. This paper explores this issue in the context of a New Zealand-based study of the relationship between the built environment and multiple measures of physical activity. Geographic information systems were used to measure three built environment attributes—dwelling density, street connectivity, and neighbourhood destination accessibility—using seven different neighbourhood definitions (three administrative unit boundaries, and 500, 800, 1000- and 1500-m road network buffers). The associations between the three built environment measures and five measures of physical activity (mean accelerometer counts per hour, percentage time in moderate–vigorous physical activity, self-reported walking for transport, self-reported walking for recreation and self-reported walking for all purposes) were modelled for each neighbourhood definition. The combination of the choice of neighbourhood definition, built environment measure, and physical activity measure determined whether evidence of an association was detected or not. Results demonstrated that, while there was no single ideal neighbourhood definition, the built environment was most consistently associated with a range of physical activity measures when the 800-m and 1000-m road network buffers were used. For the street connectivity and destination accessibility measures, associations with physical activity were less likely to be detected at smaller scales (less than 800 m). In line with some previous research, this study demonstrated that the choice of neighbourhood definition can influence whether or not an association between the built environment and adults’ physical activity is detected or not. This study additionally highlighted the importance of the choice of built environment attribute and physical activity measures. While we identified the 800-m and 1000-m road network buffers as the neighbourhood definitions most consistently associated with a range of physical activity measures, it is important that researchers carefully consider the most appropriate type of neighbourhood definition and scale for the particular aim and participants, especially at smaller scales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6540146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65401462019-06-05 How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity? Mavoa, Suzanne Bagheri, Nasser Koohsari, Mohammad Javad Kaczynski, Andrew T. Lamb, Karen E. Oka, Koichiro O’Sullivan, David Witten, Karen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Researchers investigating relationships between the neighbourhood environment and health first need to decide on the spatial extent of the neighbourhood they are interested in. This decision is an important and ongoing methodological challenge since different methods of defining and delineating neighbourhood boundaries can produce different results. This paper explores this issue in the context of a New Zealand-based study of the relationship between the built environment and multiple measures of physical activity. Geographic information systems were used to measure three built environment attributes—dwelling density, street connectivity, and neighbourhood destination accessibility—using seven different neighbourhood definitions (three administrative unit boundaries, and 500, 800, 1000- and 1500-m road network buffers). The associations between the three built environment measures and five measures of physical activity (mean accelerometer counts per hour, percentage time in moderate–vigorous physical activity, self-reported walking for transport, self-reported walking for recreation and self-reported walking for all purposes) were modelled for each neighbourhood definition. The combination of the choice of neighbourhood definition, built environment measure, and physical activity measure determined whether evidence of an association was detected or not. Results demonstrated that, while there was no single ideal neighbourhood definition, the built environment was most consistently associated with a range of physical activity measures when the 800-m and 1000-m road network buffers were used. For the street connectivity and destination accessibility measures, associations with physical activity were less likely to be detected at smaller scales (less than 800 m). In line with some previous research, this study demonstrated that the choice of neighbourhood definition can influence whether or not an association between the built environment and adults’ physical activity is detected or not. This study additionally highlighted the importance of the choice of built environment attribute and physical activity measures. While we identified the 800-m and 1000-m road network buffers as the neighbourhood definitions most consistently associated with a range of physical activity measures, it is important that researchers carefully consider the most appropriate type of neighbourhood definition and scale for the particular aim and participants, especially at smaller scales. MDPI 2019-04-28 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6540146/ /pubmed/31035336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091501 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mavoa, Suzanne Bagheri, Nasser Koohsari, Mohammad Javad Kaczynski, Andrew T. Lamb, Karen E. Oka, Koichiro O’Sullivan, David Witten, Karen How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity? |
title | How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity? |
title_full | How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity? |
title_fullStr | How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity? |
title_short | How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity? |
title_sort | how do neighbourhood definitions influence the associations between built environment and physical activity? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mavoasuzanne howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity AT bagherinasser howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity AT koohsarimohammadjavad howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity AT kaczynskiandrewt howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity AT lambkarene howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity AT okakoichiro howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity AT osullivandavid howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity AT wittenkaren howdoneighbourhooddefinitionsinfluencetheassociationsbetweenbuiltenvironmentandphysicalactivity |