Cargando…

Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications

The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications has taken the attention of several researchers. In an effort to provide interoperability and IPv6 support for the IoT devices, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed the 6LoWPAN stack. However, the particularities and ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobral, José V. V., Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C., Rabêlo, Ricardo A. L., Al-Muhtadi, Jalal, Korotaev, Valery
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31075837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19092144
_version_ 1783422559414386688
author Sobral, José V. V.
Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C.
Rabêlo, Ricardo A. L.
Al-Muhtadi, Jalal
Korotaev, Valery
author_facet Sobral, José V. V.
Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C.
Rabêlo, Ricardo A. L.
Al-Muhtadi, Jalal
Korotaev, Valery
author_sort Sobral, José V. V.
collection PubMed
description The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications has taken the attention of several researchers. In an effort to provide interoperability and IPv6 support for the IoT devices, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed the 6LoWPAN stack. However, the particularities and hardware limitations of networks associated with IoT devices lead to several challenges, mainly for routing protocols. On its stack proposal, IETF standardizes the RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) as the routing protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). RPL is a tree-based proactive routing protocol that creates acyclic graphs among the nodes to allow data exchange. Although widely considered and used by current applications, different recent studies have shown its limitations and drawbacks. Among these, it is possible to highlight the weak support of mobility and P2P traffic, restrictions for multicast transmissions, and lousy adaption for dynamic throughput. Motivated by the presented issues, several new solutions have emerged during recent years. The approaches range from the consideration of different routing metrics to an entirely new solution inspired by other routing protocols. In this context, this work aims to present an extensive survey study about routing solutions for IoT/LLN, not limited to RPL enhancements. In the course of the paper, the routing requirements of LLNs, the initial protocols, and the most recent approaches are presented. The IoT routing enhancements are divided according to its main objectives and then studied individually to point out its most important strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, as the main contribution, this study presents a comprehensive discussion about the considered approaches, identifying the still remaining open issues and suggesting future directions to be recognized by new proposals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6540171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65401712019-06-04 Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications Sobral, José V. V. Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C. Rabêlo, Ricardo A. L. Al-Muhtadi, Jalal Korotaev, Valery Sensors (Basel) Review The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications has taken the attention of several researchers. In an effort to provide interoperability and IPv6 support for the IoT devices, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed the 6LoWPAN stack. However, the particularities and hardware limitations of networks associated with IoT devices lead to several challenges, mainly for routing protocols. On its stack proposal, IETF standardizes the RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) as the routing protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). RPL is a tree-based proactive routing protocol that creates acyclic graphs among the nodes to allow data exchange. Although widely considered and used by current applications, different recent studies have shown its limitations and drawbacks. Among these, it is possible to highlight the weak support of mobility and P2P traffic, restrictions for multicast transmissions, and lousy adaption for dynamic throughput. Motivated by the presented issues, several new solutions have emerged during recent years. The approaches range from the consideration of different routing metrics to an entirely new solution inspired by other routing protocols. In this context, this work aims to present an extensive survey study about routing solutions for IoT/LLN, not limited to RPL enhancements. In the course of the paper, the routing requirements of LLNs, the initial protocols, and the most recent approaches are presented. The IoT routing enhancements are divided according to its main objectives and then studied individually to point out its most important strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, as the main contribution, this study presents a comprehensive discussion about the considered approaches, identifying the still remaining open issues and suggesting future directions to be recognized by new proposals. MDPI 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6540171/ /pubmed/31075837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19092144 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sobral, José V. V.
Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C.
Rabêlo, Ricardo A. L.
Al-Muhtadi, Jalal
Korotaev, Valery
Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications
title Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications
title_full Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications
title_fullStr Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications
title_full_unstemmed Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications
title_short Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications
title_sort routing protocols for low power and lossy networks in internet of things applications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31075837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19092144
work_keys_str_mv AT sobraljosevv routingprotocolsforlowpowerandlossynetworksininternetofthingsapplications
AT rodriguesjoeljpc routingprotocolsforlowpowerandlossynetworksininternetofthingsapplications
AT rabeloricardoal routingprotocolsforlowpowerandlossynetworksininternetofthingsapplications
AT almuhtadijalal routingprotocolsforlowpowerandlossynetworksininternetofthingsapplications
AT korotaevvalery routingprotocolsforlowpowerandlossynetworksininternetofthingsapplications