Cargando…
Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize
The feasibility of thermography as a technique for plant screening aiming at drought-tolerance has been proven by its relationship with gas exchange, biomass, and yield. In this study, unlike most of the previous, thermography was applied for phenotyping contrasting maize genotypes whose classificat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31071964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092273 |
_version_ | 1783422563799531520 |
---|---|
author | Casari, Raphael A. C. N. Paiva, Dayane S. Silva, Vivianny N. B. Ferreira, Thalita M. M. Souza, Junior, Manoel T. Oliveira, Nelson G. Kobayashi, Adilson K. Molinari, Hugo B. C. Santos, Thiago T. Gomide, Reinaldo L. Magalhães, Paulo C. Sousa, Carlos A. F. |
author_facet | Casari, Raphael A. C. N. Paiva, Dayane S. Silva, Vivianny N. B. Ferreira, Thalita M. M. Souza, Junior, Manoel T. Oliveira, Nelson G. Kobayashi, Adilson K. Molinari, Hugo B. C. Santos, Thiago T. Gomide, Reinaldo L. Magalhães, Paulo C. Sousa, Carlos A. F. |
author_sort | Casari, Raphael A. C. N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The feasibility of thermography as a technique for plant screening aiming at drought-tolerance has been proven by its relationship with gas exchange, biomass, and yield. In this study, unlike most of the previous, thermography was applied for phenotyping contrasting maize genotypes whose classification for drought tolerance had already been established in the field. Our objective was to determine whether thermography-based classification would discriminate the maize genotypes in a similar way as the field selection in which just grain yield was taken into account as a criterion. We evaluated gas exchange, daily water consumption, leaf relative water content, aboveground biomass, and grain yield. Indeed, the screening of maize genotypes based on canopy temperature showed similar results to traditional methods. Nevertheless, canopy temperature only partially reflected gas exchange rates and daily water consumption in plants under drought. Part of the explanation may lie in the changes that drought had caused in plant leaves and canopy structure, altering absorption and dissipation of energy, photosynthesis, transpiration, and partitioning rates. Accordingly, although there was a negative relationship between grain yield and plant canopy temperature, it does not necessarily mean that plants whose canopies were maintained cooler under drought achieved the highest yield. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6540190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65401902019-06-04 Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize Casari, Raphael A. C. N. Paiva, Dayane S. Silva, Vivianny N. B. Ferreira, Thalita M. M. Souza, Junior, Manoel T. Oliveira, Nelson G. Kobayashi, Adilson K. Molinari, Hugo B. C. Santos, Thiago T. Gomide, Reinaldo L. Magalhães, Paulo C. Sousa, Carlos A. F. Int J Mol Sci Article The feasibility of thermography as a technique for plant screening aiming at drought-tolerance has been proven by its relationship with gas exchange, biomass, and yield. In this study, unlike most of the previous, thermography was applied for phenotyping contrasting maize genotypes whose classification for drought tolerance had already been established in the field. Our objective was to determine whether thermography-based classification would discriminate the maize genotypes in a similar way as the field selection in which just grain yield was taken into account as a criterion. We evaluated gas exchange, daily water consumption, leaf relative water content, aboveground biomass, and grain yield. Indeed, the screening of maize genotypes based on canopy temperature showed similar results to traditional methods. Nevertheless, canopy temperature only partially reflected gas exchange rates and daily water consumption in plants under drought. Part of the explanation may lie in the changes that drought had caused in plant leaves and canopy structure, altering absorption and dissipation of energy, photosynthesis, transpiration, and partitioning rates. Accordingly, although there was a negative relationship between grain yield and plant canopy temperature, it does not necessarily mean that plants whose canopies were maintained cooler under drought achieved the highest yield. MDPI 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6540190/ /pubmed/31071964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092273 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Casari, Raphael A. C. N. Paiva, Dayane S. Silva, Vivianny N. B. Ferreira, Thalita M. M. Souza, Junior, Manoel T. Oliveira, Nelson G. Kobayashi, Adilson K. Molinari, Hugo B. C. Santos, Thiago T. Gomide, Reinaldo L. Magalhães, Paulo C. Sousa, Carlos A. F. Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize |
title | Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize |
title_full | Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize |
title_fullStr | Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize |
title_short | Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize |
title_sort | using thermography to confirm genotypic variation for drought response in maize |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31071964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT casariraphaelacn usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT paivadayanes usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT silvaviviannynb usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT ferreirathalitamm usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT souzajuniormanoelt usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT oliveiranelsong usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT kobayashiadilsonk usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT molinarihugobc usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT santosthiagot usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT gomidereinaldol usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT magalhaespauloc usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize AT sousacarlosaf usingthermographytoconfirmgenotypicvariationfordroughtresponseinmaize |