Cargando…

A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria

BACKGROUND: To reduce the malaria burden in Nigeria, the country is scaling up prevention and treatment interventions, especially household ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Nevertheless, large gaps remain to achieve the goals of the National Malaria Strategic Plan 2014–2020 of u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrada, Andrew, Herrera, Samantha, Inyang, Uwem, Mohammed, Audu Bala, Uhomoibhi, Perpetua, Yé, Yazoumé
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2816-9
_version_ 1783422627919953920
author Andrada, Andrew
Herrera, Samantha
Inyang, Uwem
Mohammed, Audu Bala
Uhomoibhi, Perpetua
Yé, Yazoumé
author_facet Andrada, Andrew
Herrera, Samantha
Inyang, Uwem
Mohammed, Audu Bala
Uhomoibhi, Perpetua
Yé, Yazoumé
author_sort Andrada, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To reduce the malaria burden in Nigeria, the country is scaling up prevention and treatment interventions, especially household ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Nevertheless, large gaps remain to achieve the goals of the National Malaria Strategic Plan 2014–2020 of universal access to ITNs and their increased use. To inform the targeting of intervention strategies and to maximize impact, the authors conducted a sub-national profiling of household ITN ownership and use in the general population to identify key predictors of ITN ownership and use, and the sub-groups that are at higher risk of low ITN coverage and use. METHODS: The authors conducted a secondary analysis of data from the 2015 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey. Using the Chi square automatic interaction detector (CHAID) and multiple logistic regression analysis, the authors examined the key predictors of ITN ownership and use in the general population throughout Nigeria. RESULTS: The CHAID models identified region of the country as the best predictor of household ownership of at least one ITN and its use in the general population, with higher ownership and use observed in the northern regions. The odds of a household owning an ITN were five times greater in the North West region compared with the North Central region (odds ratio [OR] = 5.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.46–6.72, p < 0.001). The odds of ITN use were two times greater for those living in the North West region compared with the North Central region (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.73–2.41, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors were household size, head of household education level, household wealth quintile, and place of residence. The CHAID gain index results identified households in the South West, North Central and South Central regions with low ITN ownership, and the general population in the South South, South East and North Central regions with low ITN use. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals regional differences in ITN ownership and use in Nigeria. Therefore, the findings from this analysis provide evidence that could inform the NMEP to better target future campaign and routine distribution of ITNs, to achieve universal access and increased use by 2020 in Nigeria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6540480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65404802019-06-03 A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria Andrada, Andrew Herrera, Samantha Inyang, Uwem Mohammed, Audu Bala Uhomoibhi, Perpetua Yé, Yazoumé Malar J Research BACKGROUND: To reduce the malaria burden in Nigeria, the country is scaling up prevention and treatment interventions, especially household ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Nevertheless, large gaps remain to achieve the goals of the National Malaria Strategic Plan 2014–2020 of universal access to ITNs and their increased use. To inform the targeting of intervention strategies and to maximize impact, the authors conducted a sub-national profiling of household ITN ownership and use in the general population to identify key predictors of ITN ownership and use, and the sub-groups that are at higher risk of low ITN coverage and use. METHODS: The authors conducted a secondary analysis of data from the 2015 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey. Using the Chi square automatic interaction detector (CHAID) and multiple logistic regression analysis, the authors examined the key predictors of ITN ownership and use in the general population throughout Nigeria. RESULTS: The CHAID models identified region of the country as the best predictor of household ownership of at least one ITN and its use in the general population, with higher ownership and use observed in the northern regions. The odds of a household owning an ITN were five times greater in the North West region compared with the North Central region (odds ratio [OR] = 5.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.46–6.72, p < 0.001). The odds of ITN use were two times greater for those living in the North West region compared with the North Central region (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.73–2.41, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors were household size, head of household education level, household wealth quintile, and place of residence. The CHAID gain index results identified households in the South West, North Central and South Central regions with low ITN ownership, and the general population in the South South, South East and North Central regions with low ITN use. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals regional differences in ITN ownership and use in Nigeria. Therefore, the findings from this analysis provide evidence that could inform the NMEP to better target future campaign and routine distribution of ITNs, to achieve universal access and increased use by 2020 in Nigeria. BioMed Central 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6540480/ /pubmed/31138216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2816-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Andrada, Andrew
Herrera, Samantha
Inyang, Uwem
Mohammed, Audu Bala
Uhomoibhi, Perpetua
Yé, Yazoumé
A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria
title A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria
title_full A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria
title_fullStr A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria
title_short A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria
title_sort subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of itn ownership and use in nigeria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2816-9
work_keys_str_mv AT andradaandrew asubnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT herrerasamantha asubnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT inyanguwem asubnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT mohammedaudubala asubnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT uhomoibhiperpetua asubnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT yeyazoume asubnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT andradaandrew subnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT herrerasamantha subnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT inyanguwem subnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT mohammedaudubala subnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT uhomoibhiperpetua subnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria
AT yeyazoume subnationalprofilinganalysisrevealsregionaldifferencesasthemainpredictorofitnownershipanduseinnigeria