Cargando…

Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: There is substantial evidence that patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have high response rates to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), a low likelihood of successful treatment termination, but yet a limited drug retention. Whereas several reports have assessed drug retention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindström, Ulf, Olofsson, Tor, Wedrén, Sara, Qirjazo, Ilia, Askling, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1908-9
_version_ 1783422642400788480
author Lindström, Ulf
Olofsson, Tor
Wedrén, Sara
Qirjazo, Ilia
Askling, Johan
author_facet Lindström, Ulf
Olofsson, Tor
Wedrén, Sara
Qirjazo, Ilia
Askling, Johan
author_sort Lindström, Ulf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is substantial evidence that patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have high response rates to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), a low likelihood of successful treatment termination, but yet a limited drug retention. Whereas several reports have assessed drug retention rates for TNFi in AS, there are few, if any, studies investigating the actual treatment trajectories on a patient level, including subsequent therapy changes and dose reductions, of individual patients. The aim of this study was to describe 5-year treatment trajectories in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) starting a first TNFi. METHODS: Bio-naïve patients with AS starting a TNFi in 2006–2015 were identified in the nationwide Swedish Rheumatology Quality register and followed until 31 December 2015. All changes in their anti-rheumatic treatment during follow-up were recorded. To further increase precision, these data were complimented by information on the amount of prescribed subcutaneous TNFi collected from pharmacies during each year, retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred ninety patients started a first TNFi 2006–2015, and after 1 year, 74% remained on their first TNFi. However, after 5 years, this figure was only 46%, although at that time 63% were still on treatment with any biologic, while 30% had no anti-rheumatic treatment at all. After discontinuing the first TNFi, 46% switched directly to a second TNFi, but the drug retention for the second and third TNFi grew successively shorter compared to that for the first TNFi. In contrast, patients remaining on treatment with their first subcutaneous TNFi gradually reduced the dose, so that during the fifth year of treatment only 66% had collected ≥ 75% of the defined daily doses for that year. CONCLUSION: Less than half of patients with AS will remain on their first TNFi after 5 years, but most are still on a biologic. While patients remaining on treatment with their first TNFi appear to be able to reduce the dose over time, a large proportion cycle through several biologics, and 1/3 have no anti-rheumatic treatment after 5 years. This indicates the importance of thorough follow-up programs as well as a need for alternative therapeutic options. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1908-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6540538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65405382019-06-03 Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice Lindström, Ulf Olofsson, Tor Wedrén, Sara Qirjazo, Ilia Askling, Johan Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: There is substantial evidence that patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have high response rates to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), a low likelihood of successful treatment termination, but yet a limited drug retention. Whereas several reports have assessed drug retention rates for TNFi in AS, there are few, if any, studies investigating the actual treatment trajectories on a patient level, including subsequent therapy changes and dose reductions, of individual patients. The aim of this study was to describe 5-year treatment trajectories in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) starting a first TNFi. METHODS: Bio-naïve patients with AS starting a TNFi in 2006–2015 were identified in the nationwide Swedish Rheumatology Quality register and followed until 31 December 2015. All changes in their anti-rheumatic treatment during follow-up were recorded. To further increase precision, these data were complimented by information on the amount of prescribed subcutaneous TNFi collected from pharmacies during each year, retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred ninety patients started a first TNFi 2006–2015, and after 1 year, 74% remained on their first TNFi. However, after 5 years, this figure was only 46%, although at that time 63% were still on treatment with any biologic, while 30% had no anti-rheumatic treatment at all. After discontinuing the first TNFi, 46% switched directly to a second TNFi, but the drug retention for the second and third TNFi grew successively shorter compared to that for the first TNFi. In contrast, patients remaining on treatment with their first subcutaneous TNFi gradually reduced the dose, so that during the fifth year of treatment only 66% had collected ≥ 75% of the defined daily doses for that year. CONCLUSION: Less than half of patients with AS will remain on their first TNFi after 5 years, but most are still on a biologic. While patients remaining on treatment with their first TNFi appear to be able to reduce the dose over time, a large proportion cycle through several biologics, and 1/3 have no anti-rheumatic treatment after 5 years. This indicates the importance of thorough follow-up programs as well as a need for alternative therapeutic options. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1908-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6540538/ /pubmed/31138285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1908-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lindström, Ulf
Olofsson, Tor
Wedrén, Sara
Qirjazo, Ilia
Askling, Johan
Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice
title Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice
title_full Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice
title_fullStr Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice
title_short Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice
title_sort biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1908-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lindstromulf biologicaltreatmentofankylosingspondylitisanationwidestudyoftreatmenttrajectoriesonapatientlevelinclinicalpractice
AT olofssontor biologicaltreatmentofankylosingspondylitisanationwidestudyoftreatmenttrajectoriesonapatientlevelinclinicalpractice
AT wedrensara biologicaltreatmentofankylosingspondylitisanationwidestudyoftreatmenttrajectoriesonapatientlevelinclinicalpractice
AT qirjazoilia biologicaltreatmentofankylosingspondylitisanationwidestudyoftreatmenttrajectoriesonapatientlevelinclinicalpractice
AT asklingjohan biologicaltreatmentofankylosingspondylitisanationwidestudyoftreatmenttrajectoriesonapatientlevelinclinicalpractice