Cargando…

Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop

The widespread use of protective covers in horticulture represents a novel landscape‐level change, presenting the challenges for crop pollination. Honeybees (Apis mellifera L) are pollinators of many crops, but their behavior can be affected by conditions under covers. To determine how netting crop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Lisa J., Cutting, Brian T., Jochym, Mateusz, Janke, Milena A., Felman, Crystal, Cross, Sarah, Jacob, Marine, Goodwin, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31160992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5154
_version_ 1783422667466997760
author Evans, Lisa J.
Cutting, Brian T.
Jochym, Mateusz
Janke, Milena A.
Felman, Crystal
Cross, Sarah
Jacob, Marine
Goodwin, Mark
author_facet Evans, Lisa J.
Cutting, Brian T.
Jochym, Mateusz
Janke, Milena A.
Felman, Crystal
Cross, Sarah
Jacob, Marine
Goodwin, Mark
author_sort Evans, Lisa J.
collection PubMed
description The widespread use of protective covers in horticulture represents a novel landscape‐level change, presenting the challenges for crop pollination. Honeybees (Apis mellifera L) are pollinators of many crops, but their behavior can be affected by conditions under covers. To determine how netting crop covers can affect honeybee foraging dynamics, colony health, and pollination services, we assessed the performance of 52 nucleus honeybee colonies in five covered and six uncovered kiwifruit orchards. Colony strength was estimated pre‐ and postintroduction, and the foraging of individual bees (including pollen, nectar, and naïve foragers) was monitored in a subset of the hives fitted with RFID readers. Simultaneously, we evaluated pollination effectiveness by measuring flower visitation rates and the number of seeds produced after single honeybee visits. Honeybee colonies under cover exhibited both an acute loss of foragers and changes in the behavior of successful foragers. Under cover, bees were roughly three times less likely to return after their first trip outside the hive. Consequently, the number of adult bees in hives declined at a faster rate in these orchards, with colonies losing on average 1,057 ± 274 of their bees in under two weeks. Bees that did forage under cover completed fewer trips provisioning their colony, failing to reenter after a few short‐duration trips. These effects are likely to have implications for colony health and productivity. We also found that bee density (bees/thousand flowers) and visitation rates to flowers were lower under cover; however, we did not detect a resultant change in pollination. Our findings highlight the need for environment‐specific management techniques for pollinators. Improving honeybee orientation under covers and increasing our understanding of the effects of covers on bee nutrition and brood rearing should be primary objectives for maintaining colonies and potentially improving pollination in these systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6540661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65406612019-06-03 Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop Evans, Lisa J. Cutting, Brian T. Jochym, Mateusz Janke, Milena A. Felman, Crystal Cross, Sarah Jacob, Marine Goodwin, Mark Ecol Evol Original Research The widespread use of protective covers in horticulture represents a novel landscape‐level change, presenting the challenges for crop pollination. Honeybees (Apis mellifera L) are pollinators of many crops, but their behavior can be affected by conditions under covers. To determine how netting crop covers can affect honeybee foraging dynamics, colony health, and pollination services, we assessed the performance of 52 nucleus honeybee colonies in five covered and six uncovered kiwifruit orchards. Colony strength was estimated pre‐ and postintroduction, and the foraging of individual bees (including pollen, nectar, and naïve foragers) was monitored in a subset of the hives fitted with RFID readers. Simultaneously, we evaluated pollination effectiveness by measuring flower visitation rates and the number of seeds produced after single honeybee visits. Honeybee colonies under cover exhibited both an acute loss of foragers and changes in the behavior of successful foragers. Under cover, bees were roughly three times less likely to return after their first trip outside the hive. Consequently, the number of adult bees in hives declined at a faster rate in these orchards, with colonies losing on average 1,057 ± 274 of their bees in under two weeks. Bees that did forage under cover completed fewer trips provisioning their colony, failing to reenter after a few short‐duration trips. These effects are likely to have implications for colony health and productivity. We also found that bee density (bees/thousand flowers) and visitation rates to flowers were lower under cover; however, we did not detect a resultant change in pollination. Our findings highlight the need for environment‐specific management techniques for pollinators. Improving honeybee orientation under covers and increasing our understanding of the effects of covers on bee nutrition and brood rearing should be primary objectives for maintaining colonies and potentially improving pollination in these systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6540661/ /pubmed/31160992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5154 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Evans, Lisa J.
Cutting, Brian T.
Jochym, Mateusz
Janke, Milena A.
Felman, Crystal
Cross, Sarah
Jacob, Marine
Goodwin, Mark
Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop
title Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop
title_full Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop
title_fullStr Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop
title_full_unstemmed Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop
title_short Netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop
title_sort netted crop covers reduce honeybee foraging activity and colony strength in a mass flowering crop
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31160992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5154
work_keys_str_mv AT evanslisaj nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop
AT cuttingbriant nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop
AT jochymmateusz nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop
AT jankemilenaa nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop
AT felmancrystal nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop
AT crosssarah nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop
AT jacobmarine nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop
AT goodwinmark nettedcropcoversreducehoneybeeforagingactivityandcolonystrengthinamassfloweringcrop