Cargando…

Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

The Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) is particularly sensitive to global climate change, especially to elevated temperatures, when compared with other ecosystems. However, few studies use long‐term field measurements to explore the interannual variations in plant biomass under climate fluctuations. Here,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Licong, Ke, Xun, Guo, Xiaowei, Du, Yangong, Zhang, Fawei, Li, Yikang, Li, Qian, Lin, Li, Peng, Cuoji, Shu, Kai, Cao, Guangmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5194
_version_ 1783422669593509888
author Dai, Licong
Ke, Xun
Guo, Xiaowei
Du, Yangong
Zhang, Fawei
Li, Yikang
Li, Qian
Lin, Li
Peng, Cuoji
Shu, Kai
Cao, Guangmin
author_facet Dai, Licong
Ke, Xun
Guo, Xiaowei
Du, Yangong
Zhang, Fawei
Li, Yikang
Li, Qian
Lin, Li
Peng, Cuoji
Shu, Kai
Cao, Guangmin
author_sort Dai, Licong
collection PubMed
description The Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) is particularly sensitive to global climate change, especially to elevated temperatures, when compared with other ecosystems. However, few studies use long‐term field measurements to explore the interannual variations in plant biomass under climate fluctuations. Here, we examine the interannual variations of plant biomass within two vegetation types (alpine meadow and alpine shrub) during 2008–2017 and their relationships with climate variables. The following results were obtained. The aboveground biomass (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB) response differently to climate fluctuations, the AGB in KPM was dominated by mean annual precipitation (MAP), whereas the AGB in PFS was controlled by mean annual air temperature (MAT). However, the BGB of both KPM and PFS was only weakly affected by climate variables, suggesting that the BGB in alpine ecosystems may remain as a stable carbon stock even under future global climate change. Furthermore, the AGB in PFS was significantly higher than KPM, while the BGB and R/S in KPM were significantly higher than PFS, reflecting the KPM be more likely to allocate more photosynthates to roots. Interestingly, the proportion of 0–10 cm root biomass increased in KPM and PFS, whereas the other proportions both decreased, reflecting a shift in biomass toward the surface layer. Our results could provide a new sight for the prediction how alpine ecosystem response to future climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6540674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65406742019-06-03 Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Dai, Licong Ke, Xun Guo, Xiaowei Du, Yangong Zhang, Fawei Li, Yikang Li, Qian Lin, Li Peng, Cuoji Shu, Kai Cao, Guangmin Ecol Evol Original Research The Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) is particularly sensitive to global climate change, especially to elevated temperatures, when compared with other ecosystems. However, few studies use long‐term field measurements to explore the interannual variations in plant biomass under climate fluctuations. Here, we examine the interannual variations of plant biomass within two vegetation types (alpine meadow and alpine shrub) during 2008–2017 and their relationships with climate variables. The following results were obtained. The aboveground biomass (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB) response differently to climate fluctuations, the AGB in KPM was dominated by mean annual precipitation (MAP), whereas the AGB in PFS was controlled by mean annual air temperature (MAT). However, the BGB of both KPM and PFS was only weakly affected by climate variables, suggesting that the BGB in alpine ecosystems may remain as a stable carbon stock even under future global climate change. Furthermore, the AGB in PFS was significantly higher than KPM, while the BGB and R/S in KPM were significantly higher than PFS, reflecting the KPM be more likely to allocate more photosynthates to roots. Interestingly, the proportion of 0–10 cm root biomass increased in KPM and PFS, whereas the other proportions both decreased, reflecting a shift in biomass toward the surface layer. Our results could provide a new sight for the prediction how alpine ecosystem response to future climate change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6540674/ /pubmed/31161022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5194 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dai, Licong
Ke, Xun
Guo, Xiaowei
Du, Yangong
Zhang, Fawei
Li, Yikang
Li, Qian
Lin, Li
Peng, Cuoji
Shu, Kai
Cao, Guangmin
Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_full Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_fullStr Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_full_unstemmed Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_short Responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_sort responses of biomass allocation across two vegetation types to climate fluctuations in the northern qinghai–tibet plateau
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5194
work_keys_str_mv AT dailicong responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT kexun responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT guoxiaowei responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT duyangong responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT zhangfawei responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT liyikang responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT liqian responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT linli responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT pengcuoji responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT shukai responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau
AT caoguangmin responsesofbiomassallocationacrosstwovegetationtypestoclimatefluctuationsinthenorthernqinghaitibetplateau