Cargando…
Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size
Aerial distance sampling of bears to estimate population size has been used throughout many parts of Alaska. The distance sampling models are complex since they need to account for undetected bears and differences in detection probabilities. This will require covariates and mark‐recapture data. The...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5134 |
_version_ | 1783422690297643008 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Earl Christ, Aaron |
author_facet | Becker, Earl Christ, Aaron |
author_sort | Becker, Earl |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aerial distance sampling of bears to estimate population size has been used throughout many parts of Alaska. The distance sampling models are complex since they need to account for undetected bears and differences in detection probabilities. This will require covariates and mark‐recapture data. The models proposed by Schmidt et al. do not use covariates or mark‐recapture data and are inappropriate for these surveys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6540835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65408352019-06-03 Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size Becker, Earl Christ, Aaron Ecol Evol Review Article Aerial distance sampling of bears to estimate population size has been used throughout many parts of Alaska. The distance sampling models are complex since they need to account for undetected bears and differences in detection probabilities. This will require covariates and mark‐recapture data. The models proposed by Schmidt et al. do not use covariates or mark‐recapture data and are inappropriate for these surveys. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6540835/ /pubmed/31161027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5134 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Becker, Earl Christ, Aaron Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size |
title | Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size |
title_full | Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size |
title_fullStr | Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size |
title_full_unstemmed | Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size |
title_short | Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size |
title_sort | rejection of schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckerearl rejectionofschmidtetalsestimatorsforbearpopulationsize AT christaaron rejectionofschmidtetalsestimatorsforbearpopulationsize |