Cargando…

Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE: With increasing incorporation of MRI in radiotherapy, we investigate two MRI sequences for prostate delineation in radiographer-led image guidance. METHODS: Five therapeutic radiographers contoured the prostate individually on CT, T(2) weighted (T(2)W) and T(2)* weighted (T(2)*W) imaging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pathmanathan, Angela U, McNair, Helen A, Schmidt, Maria A, Brand, Douglas H, Delacroix, Louise, Eccles, Cynthia L, Gordon, Alexandra, Herbert, Trina, van As, Nicholas J, Huddart, Robert A, Tree, Alison C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30676772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180948
_version_ 1783422692443029504
author Pathmanathan, Angela U
McNair, Helen A
Schmidt, Maria A
Brand, Douglas H
Delacroix, Louise
Eccles, Cynthia L
Gordon, Alexandra
Herbert, Trina
van As, Nicholas J
Huddart, Robert A
Tree, Alison C
author_facet Pathmanathan, Angela U
McNair, Helen A
Schmidt, Maria A
Brand, Douglas H
Delacroix, Louise
Eccles, Cynthia L
Gordon, Alexandra
Herbert, Trina
van As, Nicholas J
Huddart, Robert A
Tree, Alison C
author_sort Pathmanathan, Angela U
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: With increasing incorporation of MRI in radiotherapy, we investigate two MRI sequences for prostate delineation in radiographer-led image guidance. METHODS: Five therapeutic radiographers contoured the prostate individually on CT, T(2) weighted (T(2)W) and T(2)* weighted (T(2)*W) imaging for 10 patients. Contours were analysed with Monaco ADMIRE (research v. 2.0) to assess interobserver variability and accuracy by comparison with a gold standard clinician contour. Observers recorded time taken for contouring and scored image quality and confidence in contouring. RESULTS: There is good agreement when comparing radiographer contours to the gold-standard for all three imaging types with Dice similarity co-efficient 0.91–0.94, Cohen’s κ 0.85–0.91, Hausdorff distance 4.6–7.6 mm and mean distance between contours 0.9–1.2 mm. In addition, there is good concordance between radiographers across all imaging modalities. Both T(2)W and T(2)*W MRI show reduced interobserver variability and improved accuracy compared to CT, this was statistically significant for T(2)*W imaging compared to CT across all four comparison metrics. Comparing MRI sequences reveals significantly reduced interobserver variability and significantly improved accuracy on T(2)*W compared to T(2)W MRI for DSC and Cohen’s κ. Both MRI sequences scored significantly higher compared to CT for image quality and confidence in contouring, particularly T(2)*W. This was also reflected in the shorter time for contouring, measuring 15.4, 9.6 and 9.8 min for CT, T(2)W and T(2)*W MRI respectively. Conclusion: Therapeutic radiographer prostate contours are more accurate, show less interobserver variability and are more confidently and quickly outlined on MRI compared to CT, particularly using T(2)*W MRI. Advances in knowledge: Our work is relevant for MRI sequence choice and development of the roles of the interprofessional team in the advancement of MRI-guided radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6540870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65408702019-12-03 Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy Pathmanathan, Angela U McNair, Helen A Schmidt, Maria A Brand, Douglas H Delacroix, Louise Eccles, Cynthia L Gordon, Alexandra Herbert, Trina van As, Nicholas J Huddart, Robert A Tree, Alison C Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: With increasing incorporation of MRI in radiotherapy, we investigate two MRI sequences for prostate delineation in radiographer-led image guidance. METHODS: Five therapeutic radiographers contoured the prostate individually on CT, T(2) weighted (T(2)W) and T(2)* weighted (T(2)*W) imaging for 10 patients. Contours were analysed with Monaco ADMIRE (research v. 2.0) to assess interobserver variability and accuracy by comparison with a gold standard clinician contour. Observers recorded time taken for contouring and scored image quality and confidence in contouring. RESULTS: There is good agreement when comparing radiographer contours to the gold-standard for all three imaging types with Dice similarity co-efficient 0.91–0.94, Cohen’s κ 0.85–0.91, Hausdorff distance 4.6–7.6 mm and mean distance between contours 0.9–1.2 mm. In addition, there is good concordance between radiographers across all imaging modalities. Both T(2)W and T(2)*W MRI show reduced interobserver variability and improved accuracy compared to CT, this was statistically significant for T(2)*W imaging compared to CT across all four comparison metrics. Comparing MRI sequences reveals significantly reduced interobserver variability and significantly improved accuracy on T(2)*W compared to T(2)W MRI for DSC and Cohen’s κ. Both MRI sequences scored significantly higher compared to CT for image quality and confidence in contouring, particularly T(2)*W. This was also reflected in the shorter time for contouring, measuring 15.4, 9.6 and 9.8 min for CT, T(2)W and T(2)*W MRI respectively. Conclusion: Therapeutic radiographer prostate contours are more accurate, show less interobserver variability and are more confidently and quickly outlined on MRI compared to CT, particularly using T(2)*W MRI. Advances in knowledge: Our work is relevant for MRI sequence choice and development of the roles of the interprofessional team in the advancement of MRI-guided radiotherapy. The British Institute of Radiology. 2019-04 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6540870/ /pubmed/30676772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180948 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Pathmanathan, Angela U
McNair, Helen A
Schmidt, Maria A
Brand, Douglas H
Delacroix, Louise
Eccles, Cynthia L
Gordon, Alexandra
Herbert, Trina
van As, Nicholas J
Huddart, Robert A
Tree, Alison C
Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy
title Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy
title_full Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy
title_fullStr Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy
title_short Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy
title_sort comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for mr-guided radiotherapy
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30676772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180948
work_keys_str_mv AT pathmanathanangelau comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT mcnairhelena comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT schmidtmariaa comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT branddouglash comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT delacroixlouise comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT ecclescynthial comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT gordonalexandra comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT herberttrina comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT vanasnicholasj comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT huddartroberta comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy
AT treealisonc comparisonofprostatedelineationonmultimodalityimagingformrguidedradiotherapy