Cargando…

Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Peak bone mass - a key determinant of osteoporotic fractures result from bone accretion starting form intrauterine life to early adulthood. Optimal skeletal growth in-utero and infancy may offer protection against osteoporosis in adult life. We attempted to pool the data from available lite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramot, Rekha, Kachhawa, Garima, Kulshreshtha, Vidushi, Varshney, Shweta, Sankar, M. Jeeva, Devasenathipathy, K., Sreenivas, V., Khadgawat, Rajesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161103
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_681_18
_version_ 1783422697949102080
author Ramot, Rekha
Kachhawa, Garima
Kulshreshtha, Vidushi
Varshney, Shweta
Sankar, M. Jeeva
Devasenathipathy, K.
Sreenivas, V.
Khadgawat, Rajesh
author_facet Ramot, Rekha
Kachhawa, Garima
Kulshreshtha, Vidushi
Varshney, Shweta
Sankar, M. Jeeva
Devasenathipathy, K.
Sreenivas, V.
Khadgawat, Rajesh
author_sort Ramot, Rekha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Peak bone mass - a key determinant of osteoporotic fractures result from bone accretion starting form intrauterine life to early adulthood. Optimal skeletal growth in-utero and infancy may offer protection against osteoporosis in adult life. We attempted to pool the data from available literature to get a consensus on average bone mass among healthy newborns (age ≤30 days after birth). METHODS: Systematic review was conducted (PRISMA guidelines) to generate pooled estimates of bone mass parameters at whole body (WB) and lumbar spine (LS), based on both fixed and random effect models of meta-analyses. Two investigators independently carried out a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase. Meta-regression was applied to further explore causes of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of a total 2703 studies, 2682 was excluded leaving 21 studies for final analysis. Thirteen studies reported bone mass by Hologic(®) and eight by Lunar(®). The pooled WBBMC was 66.2g (95% CI 65.4 to 67.05 by fixed effect model, while the corresponding parameter for LS was 2.3g (95% CI 2.2 to 2.4). The subgroup and meta-regression analyses done for controlling potential confounders did not significantly affect heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: We generated the pooled estimate of bone mass (WBBMC) among healthy newborn subjects. There was high degree of heterogeneity among studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6540894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65408942019-06-03 Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ramot, Rekha Kachhawa, Garima Kulshreshtha, Vidushi Varshney, Shweta Sankar, M. Jeeva Devasenathipathy, K. Sreenivas, V. Khadgawat, Rajesh Indian J Endocrinol Metab Original Article PURPOSE: Peak bone mass - a key determinant of osteoporotic fractures result from bone accretion starting form intrauterine life to early adulthood. Optimal skeletal growth in-utero and infancy may offer protection against osteoporosis in adult life. We attempted to pool the data from available literature to get a consensus on average bone mass among healthy newborns (age ≤30 days after birth). METHODS: Systematic review was conducted (PRISMA guidelines) to generate pooled estimates of bone mass parameters at whole body (WB) and lumbar spine (LS), based on both fixed and random effect models of meta-analyses. Two investigators independently carried out a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase. Meta-regression was applied to further explore causes of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of a total 2703 studies, 2682 was excluded leaving 21 studies for final analysis. Thirteen studies reported bone mass by Hologic(®) and eight by Lunar(®). The pooled WBBMC was 66.2g (95% CI 65.4 to 67.05 by fixed effect model, while the corresponding parameter for LS was 2.3g (95% CI 2.2 to 2.4). The subgroup and meta-regression analyses done for controlling potential confounders did not significantly affect heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: We generated the pooled estimate of bone mass (WBBMC) among healthy newborn subjects. There was high degree of heterogeneity among studies. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6540894/ /pubmed/31161103 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_681_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramot, Rekha
Kachhawa, Garima
Kulshreshtha, Vidushi
Varshney, Shweta
Sankar, M. Jeeva
Devasenathipathy, K.
Sreenivas, V.
Khadgawat, Rajesh
Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort bone mass in newborns assessed by dxa – a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161103
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_681_18
work_keys_str_mv AT ramotrekha bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kachhawagarima bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kulshreshthavidushi bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT varshneyshweta bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sankarmjeeva bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT devasenathipathyk bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sreenivasv bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khadgawatrajesh bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis