Cargando…
Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
PURPOSE: Peak bone mass - a key determinant of osteoporotic fractures result from bone accretion starting form intrauterine life to early adulthood. Optimal skeletal growth in-utero and infancy may offer protection against osteoporosis in adult life. We attempted to pool the data from available lite...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161103 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_681_18 |
_version_ | 1783422697949102080 |
---|---|
author | Ramot, Rekha Kachhawa, Garima Kulshreshtha, Vidushi Varshney, Shweta Sankar, M. Jeeva Devasenathipathy, K. Sreenivas, V. Khadgawat, Rajesh |
author_facet | Ramot, Rekha Kachhawa, Garima Kulshreshtha, Vidushi Varshney, Shweta Sankar, M. Jeeva Devasenathipathy, K. Sreenivas, V. Khadgawat, Rajesh |
author_sort | Ramot, Rekha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Peak bone mass - a key determinant of osteoporotic fractures result from bone accretion starting form intrauterine life to early adulthood. Optimal skeletal growth in-utero and infancy may offer protection against osteoporosis in adult life. We attempted to pool the data from available literature to get a consensus on average bone mass among healthy newborns (age ≤30 days after birth). METHODS: Systematic review was conducted (PRISMA guidelines) to generate pooled estimates of bone mass parameters at whole body (WB) and lumbar spine (LS), based on both fixed and random effect models of meta-analyses. Two investigators independently carried out a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase. Meta-regression was applied to further explore causes of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of a total 2703 studies, 2682 was excluded leaving 21 studies for final analysis. Thirteen studies reported bone mass by Hologic(®) and eight by Lunar(®). The pooled WBBMC was 66.2g (95% CI 65.4 to 67.05 by fixed effect model, while the corresponding parameter for LS was 2.3g (95% CI 2.2 to 2.4). The subgroup and meta-regression analyses done for controlling potential confounders did not significantly affect heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: We generated the pooled estimate of bone mass (WBBMC) among healthy newborn subjects. There was high degree of heterogeneity among studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6540894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65408942019-06-03 Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ramot, Rekha Kachhawa, Garima Kulshreshtha, Vidushi Varshney, Shweta Sankar, M. Jeeva Devasenathipathy, K. Sreenivas, V. Khadgawat, Rajesh Indian J Endocrinol Metab Original Article PURPOSE: Peak bone mass - a key determinant of osteoporotic fractures result from bone accretion starting form intrauterine life to early adulthood. Optimal skeletal growth in-utero and infancy may offer protection against osteoporosis in adult life. We attempted to pool the data from available literature to get a consensus on average bone mass among healthy newborns (age ≤30 days after birth). METHODS: Systematic review was conducted (PRISMA guidelines) to generate pooled estimates of bone mass parameters at whole body (WB) and lumbar spine (LS), based on both fixed and random effect models of meta-analyses. Two investigators independently carried out a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase. Meta-regression was applied to further explore causes of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of a total 2703 studies, 2682 was excluded leaving 21 studies for final analysis. Thirteen studies reported bone mass by Hologic(®) and eight by Lunar(®). The pooled WBBMC was 66.2g (95% CI 65.4 to 67.05 by fixed effect model, while the corresponding parameter for LS was 2.3g (95% CI 2.2 to 2.4). The subgroup and meta-regression analyses done for controlling potential confounders did not significantly affect heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: We generated the pooled estimate of bone mass (WBBMC) among healthy newborn subjects. There was high degree of heterogeneity among studies. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6540894/ /pubmed/31161103 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_681_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ramot, Rekha Kachhawa, Garima Kulshreshtha, Vidushi Varshney, Shweta Sankar, M. Jeeva Devasenathipathy, K. Sreenivas, V. Khadgawat, Rajesh Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Bone Mass in Newborns Assessed by DXA – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | bone mass in newborns assessed by dxa – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161103 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_681_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramotrekha bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kachhawagarima bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kulshreshthavidushi bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT varshneyshweta bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sankarmjeeva bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT devasenathipathyk bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sreenivasv bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT khadgawatrajesh bonemassinnewbornsassessedbydxaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |