Cargando…

Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey

OBJECTIVE: To propose a new way to objectively evaluate the external sphincter function prior to male sling surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the pre-operative sphincter function throughout sphincter pressure at rest (SPAR) and sphincter pressure under contraction (SPUC) obtained througho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moser, Daniel Carlos, D'ancona, Carlos Arturo Levi, Voris, Brunno Raphael Iamashita, Lahan, Daniel, Jani, Kavina, Henry, Gerard D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30735337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0146
_version_ 1783422726210322432
author Moser, Daniel Carlos
D'ancona, Carlos Arturo Levi
Voris, Brunno Raphael Iamashita
Lahan, Daniel
Jani, Kavina
Henry, Gerard D.
author_facet Moser, Daniel Carlos
D'ancona, Carlos Arturo Levi
Voris, Brunno Raphael Iamashita
Lahan, Daniel
Jani, Kavina
Henry, Gerard D.
author_sort Moser, Daniel Carlos
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To propose a new way to objectively evaluate the external sphincter function prior to male sling surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the pre-operative sphincter function throughout sphincter pressure at rest (SPAR) and sphincter pressure under contraction (SPUC) obtained throughout urethral profilometry profile (UPP) of 10 consecutive patients (age range, 54-79 years) treated with the retrourethral transobturator sling (RTS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) because of prostate surgery. The primary endpoint for surgery success rate was post-operative pad weight test. This was correlated to pre-operative pad test, RT, SPAR and SPUC. Post-operatively patients were classified as continent (no pad use) and those who still were incontinent. RESULTS: Mean SPUC in the continent and incontinent group was respectively 188 + 8.8 (median 185.1, range 181 to 201) and 96.9 + 49.4 (median 109.9, range 35.6 to 163.6) (P = 0.008). Mean 24-hour pad test was 151 + 84.2gm (median 140, range 80 to 245) and 973 + 337.1gm (median 1940, range 550 to 1200) in post-operative continent and incontinent groups respectively (P = 0.008). The repositioning test (RT) was positive in all continent patients except one. The RT was also positive in three incontinence patients (false positive). In all post-operative continent patients SPUC was higher than 180cmH2O and pre-operative pad test was less than 245gm. CONCLUSIONS: SPUC seems to be a way for optimizing the sphincter evaluation as well to become a useful tool for patient selection prior to RTS surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6541136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65411362019-06-12 Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey Moser, Daniel Carlos D'ancona, Carlos Arturo Levi Voris, Brunno Raphael Iamashita Lahan, Daniel Jani, Kavina Henry, Gerard D. Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To propose a new way to objectively evaluate the external sphincter function prior to male sling surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the pre-operative sphincter function throughout sphincter pressure at rest (SPAR) and sphincter pressure under contraction (SPUC) obtained throughout urethral profilometry profile (UPP) of 10 consecutive patients (age range, 54-79 years) treated with the retrourethral transobturator sling (RTS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) because of prostate surgery. The primary endpoint for surgery success rate was post-operative pad weight test. This was correlated to pre-operative pad test, RT, SPAR and SPUC. Post-operatively patients were classified as continent (no pad use) and those who still were incontinent. RESULTS: Mean SPUC in the continent and incontinent group was respectively 188 + 8.8 (median 185.1, range 181 to 201) and 96.9 + 49.4 (median 109.9, range 35.6 to 163.6) (P = 0.008). Mean 24-hour pad test was 151 + 84.2gm (median 140, range 80 to 245) and 973 + 337.1gm (median 1940, range 550 to 1200) in post-operative continent and incontinent groups respectively (P = 0.008). The repositioning test (RT) was positive in all continent patients except one. The RT was also positive in three incontinence patients (false positive). In all post-operative continent patients SPUC was higher than 180cmH2O and pre-operative pad test was less than 245gm. CONCLUSIONS: SPUC seems to be a way for optimizing the sphincter evaluation as well to become a useful tool for patient selection prior to RTS surgery. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6541136/ /pubmed/30735337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0146 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moser, Daniel Carlos
D'ancona, Carlos Arturo Levi
Voris, Brunno Raphael Iamashita
Lahan, Daniel
Jani, Kavina
Henry, Gerard D.
Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey
title Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey
title_full Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey
title_fullStr Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey
title_full_unstemmed Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey
title_short Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey
title_sort proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30735337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0146
work_keys_str_mv AT moserdanielcarlos proposalofanewwaytoevaluatetheexternalsphincterfunctionpriormaleslingsurgey
AT danconacarlosarturolevi proposalofanewwaytoevaluatetheexternalsphincterfunctionpriormaleslingsurgey
AT vorisbrunnoraphaeliamashita proposalofanewwaytoevaluatetheexternalsphincterfunctionpriormaleslingsurgey
AT lahandaniel proposalofanewwaytoevaluatetheexternalsphincterfunctionpriormaleslingsurgey
AT janikavina proposalofanewwaytoevaluatetheexternalsphincterfunctionpriormaleslingsurgey
AT henrygerardd proposalofanewwaytoevaluatetheexternalsphincterfunctionpriormaleslingsurgey