Cargando…
Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a divers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6 |
_version_ | 1783422788370956288 |
---|---|
author | Chambers, Pinkie Jani, Yogini Wei, Li Kipps, Emma Forster, Martin D. Wong, Ian C. K. |
author_facet | Chambers, Pinkie Jani, Yogini Wei, Li Kipps, Emma Forster, Martin D. Wong, Ian C. K. |
author_sort | Chambers, Pinkie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a diverse treatment population that may differ from the patient groups recruited to studies, appropriate prescribing decisions by clinicians are essential. At present, results are conflicting from studies evaluating the risks of certain patient attributes on neutropenic events; we aimed to aggregate these associations to guide future management. DESIGN: A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies were identified through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to December 1, 2017. Studies were included into a meta-analysis if they adjusted for confounders; analyses were conducted in STATA v 15.1 SE. RESULTS: A total of 4415 articles were retrieved by the search with 37 meeting the inclusion criteria and 12 eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for increasing age and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 1.39 (1.11, 1.76, I(2) = 24.1%), in our subgroup analysis of 4814 patients. Odds ratios for studies were pooled that reported associations for one co-morbidity compared to none and resulted in an overall odds of 1.54 (CI 1.09–2.09, I(2) = 13.1%), including 9189 patients in total. CONCLUSIONS: Results can enhance current guidance in prescribing primary prophylaxis for treatments that either fall marginally under the internationally recognised 20% neutropenia risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6541585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65415852019-06-14 Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chambers, Pinkie Jani, Yogini Wei, Li Kipps, Emma Forster, Martin D. Wong, Ian C. K. Support Care Cancer Review Article BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a diverse treatment population that may differ from the patient groups recruited to studies, appropriate prescribing decisions by clinicians are essential. At present, results are conflicting from studies evaluating the risks of certain patient attributes on neutropenic events; we aimed to aggregate these associations to guide future management. DESIGN: A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies were identified through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to December 1, 2017. Studies were included into a meta-analysis if they adjusted for confounders; analyses were conducted in STATA v 15.1 SE. RESULTS: A total of 4415 articles were retrieved by the search with 37 meeting the inclusion criteria and 12 eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for increasing age and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 1.39 (1.11, 1.76, I(2) = 24.1%), in our subgroup analysis of 4814 patients. Odds ratios for studies were pooled that reported associations for one co-morbidity compared to none and resulted in an overall odds of 1.54 (CI 1.09–2.09, I(2) = 13.1%), including 9189 patients in total. CONCLUSIONS: Results can enhance current guidance in prescribing primary prophylaxis for treatments that either fall marginally under the internationally recognised 20% neutropenia risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6541585/ /pubmed/30993453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chambers, Pinkie Jani, Yogini Wei, Li Kipps, Emma Forster, Martin D. Wong, Ian C. K. Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chamberspinkie patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT janiyogini patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weili patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kippsemma patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT forstermartind patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wongianck patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |