Cargando…

Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a divers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chambers, Pinkie, Jani, Yogini, Wei, Li, Kipps, Emma, Forster, Martin D., Wong, Ian C. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6
_version_ 1783422788370956288
author Chambers, Pinkie
Jani, Yogini
Wei, Li
Kipps, Emma
Forster, Martin D.
Wong, Ian C. K.
author_facet Chambers, Pinkie
Jani, Yogini
Wei, Li
Kipps, Emma
Forster, Martin D.
Wong, Ian C. K.
author_sort Chambers, Pinkie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a diverse treatment population that may differ from the patient groups recruited to studies, appropriate prescribing decisions by clinicians are essential. At present, results are conflicting from studies evaluating the risks of certain patient attributes on neutropenic events; we aimed to aggregate these associations to guide future management. DESIGN: A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies were identified through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to December 1, 2017. Studies were included into a meta-analysis if they adjusted for confounders; analyses were conducted in STATA v 15.1 SE. RESULTS: A total of 4415 articles were retrieved by the search with 37 meeting the inclusion criteria and 12 eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for increasing age and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 1.39 (1.11, 1.76, I(2) = 24.1%), in our subgroup analysis of 4814 patients. Odds ratios for studies were pooled that reported associations for one co-morbidity compared to none and resulted in an overall odds of 1.54 (CI 1.09–2.09, I(2) = 13.1%), including 9189 patients in total. CONCLUSIONS: Results can enhance current guidance in prescribing primary prophylaxis for treatments that either fall marginally under the internationally recognised 20% neutropenia risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6541585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65415852019-06-14 Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chambers, Pinkie Jani, Yogini Wei, Li Kipps, Emma Forster, Martin D. Wong, Ian C. K. Support Care Cancer Review Article BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a diverse treatment population that may differ from the patient groups recruited to studies, appropriate prescribing decisions by clinicians are essential. At present, results are conflicting from studies evaluating the risks of certain patient attributes on neutropenic events; we aimed to aggregate these associations to guide future management. DESIGN: A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies were identified through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to December 1, 2017. Studies were included into a meta-analysis if they adjusted for confounders; analyses were conducted in STATA v 15.1 SE. RESULTS: A total of 4415 articles were retrieved by the search with 37 meeting the inclusion criteria and 12 eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for increasing age and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 1.39 (1.11, 1.76, I(2) = 24.1%), in our subgroup analysis of 4814 patients. Odds ratios for studies were pooled that reported associations for one co-morbidity compared to none and resulted in an overall odds of 1.54 (CI 1.09–2.09, I(2) = 13.1%), including 9189 patients in total. CONCLUSIONS: Results can enhance current guidance in prescribing primary prophylaxis for treatments that either fall marginally under the internationally recognised 20% neutropenia risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6541585/ /pubmed/30993453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chambers, Pinkie
Jani, Yogini
Wei, Li
Kipps, Emma
Forster, Martin D.
Wong, Ian C. K.
Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6
work_keys_str_mv AT chamberspinkie patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT janiyogini patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weili patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kippsemma patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT forstermartind patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wongianck patientfactorsandtheirimpactonneutropeniceventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis