Cargando…

A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts

BACKGROUND: The safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided robot-assisted interventions requires full control and high precision of assistive devices. Because many currently available tools are not MRI-compatible, the characterization of existing tools and development of new ones ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shokrollahi, Peyman, Drake, James M., Goldenberg, Andrew A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chang Gung University 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31130247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.007
_version_ 1783422831531393024
author Shokrollahi, Peyman
Drake, James M.
Goldenberg, Andrew A.
author_facet Shokrollahi, Peyman
Drake, James M.
Goldenberg, Andrew A.
author_sort Shokrollahi, Peyman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided robot-assisted interventions requires full control and high precision of assistive devices. Because many currently available tools are not MRI-compatible, the characterization of existing tools and development of new ones are necessary. The purpose of this research is to identify and minimize the image artifacts generated by a USM in MR images. METHODS: The behavior of an ultrasonic motor (USM), the most common MRI-safe actuator, in a high-field scanner was investigated. The motor was located in three orientations with respect to the bore axis with the power on or off. The induced image artifacts were compared across four sequences. Three artifact reduction methods (employing ultrashort sequences, slice thickness reductions, and bandwidth increments) were tested. RESULTS: Signal voids, pileups, and geometric distortions were observed when the motor was off. The artifact size was minimal when the motor shaft was aligned with the bore axis. In addition to the above artifacts, zipper and motion artifacts were noted when the motor was running, and these artifacts increased with increasing motor speed. Increasing the bandwidth slightly reduced the artifacts. However, decreasing the slice thickness from 5 mm to 3 mm and from 5 mm to 1 mm reduced artifact size from 30% to 40% and from 60% to 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The image artifacts were due to the non-homogenous nature of the static and gradient fields caused by the motor structure. The operating motor interferes with the RF field, causing zipper and motion artifacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6541879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chang Gung University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65418792019-06-03 A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts Shokrollahi, Peyman Drake, James M. Goldenberg, Andrew A. Biomed J Original Article BACKGROUND: The safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided robot-assisted interventions requires full control and high precision of assistive devices. Because many currently available tools are not MRI-compatible, the characterization of existing tools and development of new ones are necessary. The purpose of this research is to identify and minimize the image artifacts generated by a USM in MR images. METHODS: The behavior of an ultrasonic motor (USM), the most common MRI-safe actuator, in a high-field scanner was investigated. The motor was located in three orientations with respect to the bore axis with the power on or off. The induced image artifacts were compared across four sequences. Three artifact reduction methods (employing ultrashort sequences, slice thickness reductions, and bandwidth increments) were tested. RESULTS: Signal voids, pileups, and geometric distortions were observed when the motor was off. The artifact size was minimal when the motor shaft was aligned with the bore axis. In addition to the above artifacts, zipper and motion artifacts were noted when the motor was running, and these artifacts increased with increasing motor speed. Increasing the bandwidth slightly reduced the artifacts. However, decreasing the slice thickness from 5 mm to 3 mm and from 5 mm to 1 mm reduced artifact size from 30% to 40% and from 60% to 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The image artifacts were due to the non-homogenous nature of the static and gradient fields caused by the motor structure. The operating motor interferes with the RF field, causing zipper and motion artifacts. Chang Gung University 2019-04 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6541879/ /pubmed/31130247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.007 Text en © 2019 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Shokrollahi, Peyman
Drake, James M.
Goldenberg, Andrew A.
A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts
title A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts
title_full A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts
title_fullStr A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts
title_full_unstemmed A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts
title_short A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts
title_sort study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (mri) artifacts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31130247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.007
work_keys_str_mv AT shokrollahipeyman astudyonobservedultrasonicmotorinducedmagneticresonanceimagingmriartifacts
AT drakejamesm astudyonobservedultrasonicmotorinducedmagneticresonanceimagingmriartifacts
AT goldenbergandrewa astudyonobservedultrasonicmotorinducedmagneticresonanceimagingmriartifacts
AT shokrollahipeyman studyonobservedultrasonicmotorinducedmagneticresonanceimagingmriartifacts
AT drakejamesm studyonobservedultrasonicmotorinducedmagneticresonanceimagingmriartifacts
AT goldenbergandrewa studyonobservedultrasonicmotorinducedmagneticresonanceimagingmriartifacts