Cargando…

What Are the Important Predictors of Postoperative Functional Recovery in Patients With Cervical OPLL? Results of a Multivariate Analysis

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify important predictors of poor functional recovery in patients undergoing surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakashima, Hiroaki, Kanemura, Tokumi, Kanbara, Shunsuke, Satake, Kotaro, Ito, Keigo, Ishiguro, Naoki, Kato, Fumihiko, Imagama, Shiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218794665
Descripción
Sumario:STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify important predictors of poor functional recovery in patients undergoing surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 142 OPLL patients with laminoplasty; 135 had complete radiographical data and were followed up for ≥2 years. The following OPLL characteristics were compared between patients with “good” and “poor” outcomes (Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] recovery rate ≥50% and <50%, respectively): number of ossified levels, OPLL classification, ossification shape, K-line, canal-occupying ratio, and increased magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity. Predictors of functional recovery were identified. RESULTS: Pre- and postoperative (2 years following surgery) JOA scores were 10.6 ± 2.9 and 14.1 ± 2.2, respectively, indicating significant improvement following laminoplasty (P < .001). The average JOA recovery rate was 53.4% ± 34.7%, with 81 (60.0%) and 54 (40.0%) patients in the better and poorer neurological outcome groups, respectively. The canal occupation ratio of OPLL ≤60%/>60% were 117 (86.7%) and 18 (13.3%) patients, respectively. In the stepwise logistic regression analysis, an occupation ratio greater than 60% was identified as a significant factor for poor postoperative neurological outcome (relative risk, 4.82; 95% confidential interval, 1.61-14.46, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: This multivariate analysis demonstrated a large size OPLL (occupying ratio >60%) was associated with a risk of poor neurological recovery roughly 5 times greater, and therefore other types of surgery are recommended in cases with such a ratio.