Cargando…

Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey

BACKGROUND: Nasal irrigation is widely used as an adjunctive treatment for nasal diseases. There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of the devices used in this procedure. The objective of this survey was to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices based on the experiences of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piromchai, Patorn, Puvatanond, Charoiboon, Kirtsreesakul, Virat, Chaiyasate, Saisawat, Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179187
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7000
_version_ 1783422917288132608
author Piromchai, Patorn
Puvatanond, Charoiboon
Kirtsreesakul, Virat
Chaiyasate, Saisawat
Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
author_facet Piromchai, Patorn
Puvatanond, Charoiboon
Kirtsreesakul, Virat
Chaiyasate, Saisawat
Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
author_sort Piromchai, Patorn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nasal irrigation is widely used as an adjunctive treatment for nasal diseases. There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of the devices used in this procedure. The objective of this survey was to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices based on the experiences of patients and physicians. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre survey study between November 2017 and October 2018. Physician and patient questionnaires were developed based on the available literature and expert opinion. The physician questionnaire was submitted to the Otolaryngology residents and staff of each centre and their network. The physicians were also asked to distribute the patient questionnaire to their patients. RESULTS: Information regarding 331 devices used by the patients was collected. The mean age of the patients was 45.46 ± 17.19 years (from 5 to 81). Roughly half were male, and half were female (48.6%: 51.4%). Among the high-pressure devices, we found that the high-pressure large-volume nasal irrigation devices yielded significantly higher symptom scores in seven of 12 domains (p < 0.05). Among the large-volume devices, we found that the large-volume high-pressure nasal irrigation devices received significantly higher symptom scores in 4 of 12 domains (p < 0.05). However, a higher proportion of patients using the large-volume high-pressure devices had retained fluid in the sinuses compared to those using large-volume low-pressure devices (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This survey supports the regular use of nasal irrigation, particularly with large-volume high-pressure devices, as an effective treatment for nasal disease. It may be effective at clearing nasal secretion, improve nasal congestion, decrease post-nasal drip, improve sinus pain or headache, improve taste and smell, and improve sleep quality. It could be used by patients with good compliance and minimal side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6542345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65423452019-06-09 Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey Piromchai, Patorn Puvatanond, Charoiboon Kirtsreesakul, Virat Chaiyasate, Saisawat Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak PeerJ Allergy and Clinical Immunology BACKGROUND: Nasal irrigation is widely used as an adjunctive treatment for nasal diseases. There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of the devices used in this procedure. The objective of this survey was to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices based on the experiences of patients and physicians. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre survey study between November 2017 and October 2018. Physician and patient questionnaires were developed based on the available literature and expert opinion. The physician questionnaire was submitted to the Otolaryngology residents and staff of each centre and their network. The physicians were also asked to distribute the patient questionnaire to their patients. RESULTS: Information regarding 331 devices used by the patients was collected. The mean age of the patients was 45.46 ± 17.19 years (from 5 to 81). Roughly half were male, and half were female (48.6%: 51.4%). Among the high-pressure devices, we found that the high-pressure large-volume nasal irrigation devices yielded significantly higher symptom scores in seven of 12 domains (p < 0.05). Among the large-volume devices, we found that the large-volume high-pressure nasal irrigation devices received significantly higher symptom scores in 4 of 12 domains (p < 0.05). However, a higher proportion of patients using the large-volume high-pressure devices had retained fluid in the sinuses compared to those using large-volume low-pressure devices (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This survey supports the regular use of nasal irrigation, particularly with large-volume high-pressure devices, as an effective treatment for nasal disease. It may be effective at clearing nasal secretion, improve nasal congestion, decrease post-nasal drip, improve sinus pain or headache, improve taste and smell, and improve sleep quality. It could be used by patients with good compliance and minimal side effects. PeerJ Inc. 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6542345/ /pubmed/31179187 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7000 Text en ©2019 Piromchai et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Piromchai, Patorn
Puvatanond, Charoiboon
Kirtsreesakul, Virat
Chaiyasate, Saisawat
Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey
title Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey
title_full Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey
title_fullStr Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey
title_short Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey
title_sort effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a thai multicentre survey
topic Allergy and Clinical Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179187
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7000
work_keys_str_mv AT piromchaipatorn effectivenessofnasalirrigationdevicesathaimulticentresurvey
AT puvatanondcharoiboon effectivenessofnasalirrigationdevicesathaimulticentresurvey
AT kirtsreesakulvirat effectivenessofnasalirrigationdevicesathaimulticentresurvey
AT chaiyasatesaisawat effectivenessofnasalirrigationdevicesathaimulticentresurvey
AT thanaviratananichsanguansak effectivenessofnasalirrigationdevicesathaimulticentresurvey