Cargando…

Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study

BACKGROUND: Hospital Information System (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of HISs is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians and managers. AIM: In the present stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebnehoseini, Zahra, Tabesh, Hamed, Deldar, Kolsoum, Mostafavi, Sayyed Mostafa, Tara, Mahmood
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.294
_version_ 1783422927031500800
author Ebnehoseini, Zahra
Tabesh, Hamed
Deldar, Kolsoum
Mostafavi, Sayyed Mostafa
Tara, Mahmood
author_facet Ebnehoseini, Zahra
Tabesh, Hamed
Deldar, Kolsoum
Mostafavi, Sayyed Mostafa
Tara, Mahmood
author_sort Ebnehoseini, Zahra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital Information System (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of HISs is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians and managers. AIM: In the present study, we develop a novel instrument to measure HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints in a teaching hospital. METHODS: The study was conducted in Ebnesina and Dr Hejazi Psychiatric Hospital and education centre in Mashhad, Iran. The instrument for data collection was a self-administered structured questionnaire based on ISSM, covering seven dimensions, which includes system quality, information quality, service quality, system use, usefulness, satisfaction, and net benefits. The verification of content validity was carried out by an expert panel. The internal consistency of dimensions was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the significance of associations between dimensions. The HIS success rate on users’ viewpoints was determined. RESULTS: A total of 125 users participated in the study. The instrument was validated by an expert panel with the Content Validity Index (CVI): 0.85 and Content Validity Ratio (CVR): 0.86. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value of the instrument was 0.93. The Pearson correlation coefficient showed significant positive relationships among the investigated dimensions. On average, HIS success rate in the hospital under study was 65% (CI: 64%, 67%). The dimensions of “usefulness”, “system quality”, and “net benefits” showed the highest rates of success, respectively. CONCLUSION: The instrument used in this study can be adopted for HIS evaluation in future studies. In the current study, a method was developed to determine the HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints. This method allows for the comparison of HIS success rates in various hospitals. As well, our findings underscore the viewpoints of HIS users in a developing country.’
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6542404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65424042019-06-13 Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study Ebnehoseini, Zahra Tabesh, Hamed Deldar, Kolsoum Mostafavi, Sayyed Mostafa Tara, Mahmood Open Access Maced J Med Sci Medical Informatics BACKGROUND: Hospital Information System (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of HISs is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians and managers. AIM: In the present study, we develop a novel instrument to measure HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints in a teaching hospital. METHODS: The study was conducted in Ebnesina and Dr Hejazi Psychiatric Hospital and education centre in Mashhad, Iran. The instrument for data collection was a self-administered structured questionnaire based on ISSM, covering seven dimensions, which includes system quality, information quality, service quality, system use, usefulness, satisfaction, and net benefits. The verification of content validity was carried out by an expert panel. The internal consistency of dimensions was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the significance of associations between dimensions. The HIS success rate on users’ viewpoints was determined. RESULTS: A total of 125 users participated in the study. The instrument was validated by an expert panel with the Content Validity Index (CVI): 0.85 and Content Validity Ratio (CVR): 0.86. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value of the instrument was 0.93. The Pearson correlation coefficient showed significant positive relationships among the investigated dimensions. On average, HIS success rate in the hospital under study was 65% (CI: 64%, 67%). The dimensions of “usefulness”, “system quality”, and “net benefits” showed the highest rates of success, respectively. CONCLUSION: The instrument used in this study can be adopted for HIS evaluation in future studies. In the current study, a method was developed to determine the HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints. This method allows for the comparison of HIS success rates in various hospitals. As well, our findings underscore the viewpoints of HIS users in a developing country.’ Republic of Macedonia 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6542404/ /pubmed/31198444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.294 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Zahra Ebnehoseini, Hamed Tabesh, Kolsoum Deldar, Sayyed Mostafa Mostafavi, Mahmood Tara. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Medical Informatics
Ebnehoseini, Zahra
Tabesh, Hamed
Deldar, Kolsoum
Mostafavi, Sayyed Mostafa
Tara, Mahmood
Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study
title Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study
title_full Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study
title_fullStr Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study
title_short Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study
title_sort determining the hospital information system (his) success rate: development of a new instrument and case study
topic Medical Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.294
work_keys_str_mv AT ebnehoseinizahra determiningthehospitalinformationsystemhissuccessratedevelopmentofanewinstrumentandcasestudy
AT tabeshhamed determiningthehospitalinformationsystemhissuccessratedevelopmentofanewinstrumentandcasestudy
AT deldarkolsoum determiningthehospitalinformationsystemhissuccessratedevelopmentofanewinstrumentandcasestudy
AT mostafavisayyedmostafa determiningthehospitalinformationsystemhissuccessratedevelopmentofanewinstrumentandcasestudy
AT taramahmood determiningthehospitalinformationsystemhissuccessratedevelopmentofanewinstrumentandcasestudy