Cargando…

Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants

INTRODUCTION: Routine retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations are an important part of neonatal care, and mydriatic medicines are essential in dilating the pupil for the eye examination. There are concerns about the level of evidence for efficacy and safety of these mydriatic medicines. OBJECTIV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kremer, Lisa Jean, Reith, David M, Medlicott, Natalie, Broadbent, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448
_version_ 1783422931118850048
author Kremer, Lisa Jean
Reith, David M
Medlicott, Natalie
Broadbent, Roland
author_facet Kremer, Lisa Jean
Reith, David M
Medlicott, Natalie
Broadbent, Roland
author_sort Kremer, Lisa Jean
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Routine retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations are an important part of neonatal care, and mydriatic medicines are essential in dilating the pupil for the eye examination. There are concerns about the level of evidence for efficacy and safety of these mydriatic medicines. OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates both efficacy and safety evidence of mydriatics used during the retinopathy of prematurity eye examination. METHOD: Systematic literature review. RESULTS: There is limited evidence guiding clinical practice for safety and efficacy of mydriatics. The majority of publications are underpowered and with an unclear to high level of bias. There are a wide variety of mydriatic regimens evaluated for efficacy and safety, and multiple regimens are associated with case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Current international guideline seems unnecessarily high, especially when the reviewed literature suggest that lower doses are effective, albiet from underpowered studies. The lowest effective combination regimen appears to be phenylephrine 1% and cyclopentolate 0.2% (1 drop). Microdrop administration of this regimen would further increase the safety profile, however, efficacy needs to be assessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6542421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65424212019-06-14 Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants Kremer, Lisa Jean Reith, David M Medlicott, Natalie Broadbent, Roland BMJ Paediatr Open Review INTRODUCTION: Routine retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations are an important part of neonatal care, and mydriatic medicines are essential in dilating the pupil for the eye examination. There are concerns about the level of evidence for efficacy and safety of these mydriatic medicines. OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates both efficacy and safety evidence of mydriatics used during the retinopathy of prematurity eye examination. METHOD: Systematic literature review. RESULTS: There is limited evidence guiding clinical practice for safety and efficacy of mydriatics. The majority of publications are underpowered and with an unclear to high level of bias. There are a wide variety of mydriatic regimens evaluated for efficacy and safety, and multiple regimens are associated with case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Current international guideline seems unnecessarily high, especially when the reviewed literature suggest that lower doses are effective, albiet from underpowered studies. The lowest effective combination regimen appears to be phenylephrine 1% and cyclopentolate 0.2% (1 drop). Microdrop administration of this regimen would further increase the safety profile, however, efficacy needs to be assessed. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6542421/ /pubmed/31206081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Kremer, Lisa Jean
Reith, David M
Medlicott, Natalie
Broadbent, Roland
Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
title Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
title_full Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
title_fullStr Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
title_short Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
title_sort systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448
work_keys_str_mv AT kremerlisajean systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants
AT reithdavidm systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants
AT medlicottnatalie systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants
AT broadbentroland systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants