Cargando…
Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants
INTRODUCTION: Routine retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations are an important part of neonatal care, and mydriatic medicines are essential in dilating the pupil for the eye examination. There are concerns about the level of evidence for efficacy and safety of these mydriatic medicines. OBJECTIV...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448 |
_version_ | 1783422931118850048 |
---|---|
author | Kremer, Lisa Jean Reith, David M Medlicott, Natalie Broadbent, Roland |
author_facet | Kremer, Lisa Jean Reith, David M Medlicott, Natalie Broadbent, Roland |
author_sort | Kremer, Lisa Jean |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Routine retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations are an important part of neonatal care, and mydriatic medicines are essential in dilating the pupil for the eye examination. There are concerns about the level of evidence for efficacy and safety of these mydriatic medicines. OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates both efficacy and safety evidence of mydriatics used during the retinopathy of prematurity eye examination. METHOD: Systematic literature review. RESULTS: There is limited evidence guiding clinical practice for safety and efficacy of mydriatics. The majority of publications are underpowered and with an unclear to high level of bias. There are a wide variety of mydriatic regimens evaluated for efficacy and safety, and multiple regimens are associated with case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Current international guideline seems unnecessarily high, especially when the reviewed literature suggest that lower doses are effective, albiet from underpowered studies. The lowest effective combination regimen appears to be phenylephrine 1% and cyclopentolate 0.2% (1 drop). Microdrop administration of this regimen would further increase the safety profile, however, efficacy needs to be assessed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6542421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65424212019-06-14 Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants Kremer, Lisa Jean Reith, David M Medlicott, Natalie Broadbent, Roland BMJ Paediatr Open Review INTRODUCTION: Routine retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations are an important part of neonatal care, and mydriatic medicines are essential in dilating the pupil for the eye examination. There are concerns about the level of evidence for efficacy and safety of these mydriatic medicines. OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates both efficacy and safety evidence of mydriatics used during the retinopathy of prematurity eye examination. METHOD: Systematic literature review. RESULTS: There is limited evidence guiding clinical practice for safety and efficacy of mydriatics. The majority of publications are underpowered and with an unclear to high level of bias. There are a wide variety of mydriatic regimens evaluated for efficacy and safety, and multiple regimens are associated with case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Current international guideline seems unnecessarily high, especially when the reviewed literature suggest that lower doses are effective, albiet from underpowered studies. The lowest effective combination regimen appears to be phenylephrine 1% and cyclopentolate 0.2% (1 drop). Microdrop administration of this regimen would further increase the safety profile, however, efficacy needs to be assessed. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6542421/ /pubmed/31206081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Kremer, Lisa Jean Reith, David M Medlicott, Natalie Broadbent, Roland Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants |
title | Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants |
title_full | Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants |
title_short | Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants |
title_sort | systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kremerlisajean systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants AT reithdavidm systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants AT medlicottnatalie systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants AT broadbentroland systematicreviewofmydriaticsusedforscreeningofretinopathyinprematureinfants |