Cargando…

How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence

Patients with stroke admitted at the neurology/neurosurgery ward of the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, may experience problems in communication, such as aphasia, severe confusion/delirium or severe language barriers. This may prevent self-reported pain assessment; therefore,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vink, Peter, Torensma, Bart, Lucas, Cees, Hollmann, Markus W, van Schaik, Ivo N, Vermeulen, Hester
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000447
_version_ 1783422939556741120
author Vink, Peter
Torensma, Bart
Lucas, Cees
Hollmann, Markus W
van Schaik, Ivo N
Vermeulen, Hester
author_facet Vink, Peter
Torensma, Bart
Lucas, Cees
Hollmann, Markus W
van Schaik, Ivo N
Vermeulen, Hester
author_sort Vink, Peter
collection PubMed
description Patients with stroke admitted at the neurology/neurosurgery ward of the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, may experience problems in communication, such as aphasia, severe confusion/delirium or severe language barriers. This may prevent self-reported pain assessment; therefore, pain behaviour observation scales are needed. In this project, we therefore aimed to implement the Rotterdam Elderly Pain Observation Scale (REPOS) by video training. We used a stepped-wedge cluster design with clusters of four to five nurses with intervals of 2 weeks, for a total study duration of 34 weeks. Primary endpoint was the proportion of shifts in which nurses used the REPOS when caring for an eligible patient. A questionnaire was send biweekly to assess self-perceived competence and attitude on pain measurement in patients able or unable to self-report pain intensity. No other strategies were used to promote the use of the REPOS. Though the proportion of shifts in which trained nurses cared for eligible patients increased from 0% at baseline to 83% at the end of the study, the proportion of cumulative shifts where the REPOS was used decreased from 14% to 6%, respectively. Process evaluation suggests that this decrease can (in part) be attributed to low and varying prevalence of eligible patients and opportunities for practice. In total, 24 (45.3%) nurses had used the REPOS at least once after 34 weeks, with a median of two times (1–33). Nurses perceived themselves 'competent' to 'very competent' in pain behaviour observation. There was no negative attitude towards pain measurement. This study shows that education alone may not be effective when implementing a pain behaviour observation scale for non-communicative patients with Acquired Brain Injury. Individual motivation of health professionals and individual patient factors may be of influence for the use of the REPOS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6542455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65424552019-06-14 How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence Vink, Peter Torensma, Bart Lucas, Cees Hollmann, Markus W van Schaik, Ivo N Vermeulen, Hester BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report Patients with stroke admitted at the neurology/neurosurgery ward of the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, may experience problems in communication, such as aphasia, severe confusion/delirium or severe language barriers. This may prevent self-reported pain assessment; therefore, pain behaviour observation scales are needed. In this project, we therefore aimed to implement the Rotterdam Elderly Pain Observation Scale (REPOS) by video training. We used a stepped-wedge cluster design with clusters of four to five nurses with intervals of 2 weeks, for a total study duration of 34 weeks. Primary endpoint was the proportion of shifts in which nurses used the REPOS when caring for an eligible patient. A questionnaire was send biweekly to assess self-perceived competence and attitude on pain measurement in patients able or unable to self-report pain intensity. No other strategies were used to promote the use of the REPOS. Though the proportion of shifts in which trained nurses cared for eligible patients increased from 0% at baseline to 83% at the end of the study, the proportion of cumulative shifts where the REPOS was used decreased from 14% to 6%, respectively. Process evaluation suggests that this decrease can (in part) be attributed to low and varying prevalence of eligible patients and opportunities for practice. In total, 24 (45.3%) nurses had used the REPOS at least once after 34 weeks, with a median of two times (1–33). Nurses perceived themselves 'competent' to 'very competent' in pain behaviour observation. There was no negative attitude towards pain measurement. This study shows that education alone may not be effective when implementing a pain behaviour observation scale for non-communicative patients with Acquired Brain Injury. Individual motivation of health professionals and individual patient factors may be of influence for the use of the REPOS. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6542455/ /pubmed/31206052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000447 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement report
Vink, Peter
Torensma, Bart
Lucas, Cees
Hollmann, Markus W
van Schaik, Ivo N
Vermeulen, Hester
How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence
title How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence
title_full How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence
title_fullStr How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence
title_full_unstemmed How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence
title_short How incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence
title_sort how incremental video training did not guarantee implementation due to fluctuating population prevalence
topic BMJ Quality Improvement report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000447
work_keys_str_mv AT vinkpeter howincrementalvideotrainingdidnotguaranteeimplementationduetofluctuatingpopulationprevalence
AT torensmabart howincrementalvideotrainingdidnotguaranteeimplementationduetofluctuatingpopulationprevalence
AT lucascees howincrementalvideotrainingdidnotguaranteeimplementationduetofluctuatingpopulationprevalence
AT hollmannmarkusw howincrementalvideotrainingdidnotguaranteeimplementationduetofluctuatingpopulationprevalence
AT vanschaikivon howincrementalvideotrainingdidnotguaranteeimplementationduetofluctuatingpopulationprevalence
AT vermeulenhester howincrementalvideotrainingdidnotguaranteeimplementationduetofluctuatingpopulationprevalence