Cargando…

Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation

There is evidence that children begin to understand negation early in the preschool years, but children’s processing of negation is not well understood. We examined children’s processing of denial negation using a variant of the visual world paradigm called the Shopping Task. In this task, participa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doyle, Alison W., Friesen, Kelsey, Reimer, Sarah, Pexman, Penny M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31178811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01227
_version_ 1783423009165410304
author Doyle, Alison W.
Friesen, Kelsey
Reimer, Sarah
Pexman, Penny M.
author_facet Doyle, Alison W.
Friesen, Kelsey
Reimer, Sarah
Pexman, Penny M.
author_sort Doyle, Alison W.
collection PubMed
description There is evidence that children begin to understand negation early in the preschool years, but children’s processing of negation is not well understood. We examined children’s processing of denial negation using a variant of the visual world paradigm called the Shopping Task. In this task, participants help a puppet to find the items on a shopping list, selecting from two potential items on each trial in response to the puppet’s affirmative (“the next item is an apple”) or negation (“the next item is not an orange”) sentence. In this binary decision context, participants’ eye gaze and reaching behavior were tracked as they selected the item the puppet wants. Participants were 78 children aged 4–5 years and a comparison group of 30 adults. Results showed that children took longer to process negation than affirmative sentences, and that this difference arose early in processing. Further, children’s eye gaze behavior suggested that on negation trials they regularly looked first to the negated object and were considering the negated meaning early in processing. Adults did not take longer to process negation than affirmative sentences, but their eye gaze behavior also indicated early consideration of negated meanings for negation sentences. We also examined relationships between children’s language and executive function skills and their processing of negation and found no significant relationships. We conclude that both adults and children activate to-be-negated information in the processing of negation. Children, however, are less efficient at processing negation in this context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6542979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65429792019-06-07 Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation Doyle, Alison W. Friesen, Kelsey Reimer, Sarah Pexman, Penny M. Front Psychol Psychology There is evidence that children begin to understand negation early in the preschool years, but children’s processing of negation is not well understood. We examined children’s processing of denial negation using a variant of the visual world paradigm called the Shopping Task. In this task, participants help a puppet to find the items on a shopping list, selecting from two potential items on each trial in response to the puppet’s affirmative (“the next item is an apple”) or negation (“the next item is not an orange”) sentence. In this binary decision context, participants’ eye gaze and reaching behavior were tracked as they selected the item the puppet wants. Participants were 78 children aged 4–5 years and a comparison group of 30 adults. Results showed that children took longer to process negation than affirmative sentences, and that this difference arose early in processing. Further, children’s eye gaze behavior suggested that on negation trials they regularly looked first to the negated object and were considering the negated meaning early in processing. Adults did not take longer to process negation than affirmative sentences, but their eye gaze behavior also indicated early consideration of negated meanings for negation sentences. We also examined relationships between children’s language and executive function skills and their processing of negation and found no significant relationships. We conclude that both adults and children activate to-be-negated information in the processing of negation. Children, however, are less efficient at processing negation in this context. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6542979/ /pubmed/31178811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01227 Text en Copyright © 2019 Doyle, Friesen, Reimer and Pexman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Doyle, Alison W.
Friesen, Kelsey
Reimer, Sarah
Pexman, Penny M.
Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation
title Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation
title_full Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation
title_fullStr Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation
title_full_unstemmed Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation
title_short Grasping the Alternative: Reaching and Eyegaze Reveal Children’s Processing of Negation
title_sort grasping the alternative: reaching and eyegaze reveal children’s processing of negation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31178811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01227
work_keys_str_mv AT doylealisonw graspingthealternativereachingandeyegazerevealchildrensprocessingofnegation
AT friesenkelsey graspingthealternativereachingandeyegazerevealchildrensprocessingofnegation
AT reimersarah graspingthealternativereachingandeyegazerevealchildrensprocessingofnegation
AT pexmanpennym graspingthealternativereachingandeyegazerevealchildrensprocessingofnegation