Cargando…
Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new prognostic classification for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using gradient boosting (GB) and to compare the accuracy of the prognostic model with the conventional statistical method. METHODS: Information of EOC patients from Samsung M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31074247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e65 |
_version_ | 1783423039029903360 |
---|---|
author | Paik, E Sun Lee, Jeong-Won Park, Jeong-Yeol Kim, Ju-Hyun Kim, Mijung Kim, Tae-Joong Choi, Chel Hun Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk-Soo Seo, Sung Wook |
author_facet | Paik, E Sun Lee, Jeong-Won Park, Jeong-Yeol Kim, Ju-Hyun Kim, Mijung Kim, Tae-Joong Choi, Chel Hun Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk-Soo Seo, Sung Wook |
author_sort | Paik, E Sun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new prognostic classification for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using gradient boosting (GB) and to compare the accuracy of the prognostic model with the conventional statistical method. METHODS: Information of EOC patients from Samsung Medical Center (training cohort, n=1,128) was analyzed to optimize the prognostic model using GB. The performance of the final model was externally validated with patient information from Asan Medical Center (validation cohort, n=229). The area under the curve (AUC) by the GB model was compared to that of the conventional Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (CoxPHR) model. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the AUC of the GB model for predicting second year overall survival (OS), with the highest target value, was 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.802–0.853). In the validation cohort, the GB model also showed high AUC of 0.843 (95% CI=0.833–0.853). In comparison, the conventional CoxPHR method showed lower AUC (0.668 (95% CI=0.617–0.719) for the training cohort and 0.597 (95% CI=0.474–0.719) for the validation cohort) compared to GB. New classification according to survival probability scores of the GB model identified four distinct prognostic subgroups that showed more discriminately classified prediction than the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. CONCLUSION: Our novel GB-guided classification accurately identified the prognostic subgroups of patients with EOC and showed higher accuracy than the conventional method. This approach would be useful for accurate estimation of individual outcomes of EOC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6543110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65431102019-07-01 Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods Paik, E Sun Lee, Jeong-Won Park, Jeong-Yeol Kim, Ju-Hyun Kim, Mijung Kim, Tae-Joong Choi, Chel Hun Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk-Soo Seo, Sung Wook J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new prognostic classification for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using gradient boosting (GB) and to compare the accuracy of the prognostic model with the conventional statistical method. METHODS: Information of EOC patients from Samsung Medical Center (training cohort, n=1,128) was analyzed to optimize the prognostic model using GB. The performance of the final model was externally validated with patient information from Asan Medical Center (validation cohort, n=229). The area under the curve (AUC) by the GB model was compared to that of the conventional Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (CoxPHR) model. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the AUC of the GB model for predicting second year overall survival (OS), with the highest target value, was 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.802–0.853). In the validation cohort, the GB model also showed high AUC of 0.843 (95% CI=0.833–0.853). In comparison, the conventional CoxPHR method showed lower AUC (0.668 (95% CI=0.617–0.719) for the training cohort and 0.597 (95% CI=0.474–0.719) for the validation cohort) compared to GB. New classification according to survival probability scores of the GB model identified four distinct prognostic subgroups that showed more discriminately classified prediction than the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. CONCLUSION: Our novel GB-guided classification accurately identified the prognostic subgroups of patients with EOC and showed higher accuracy than the conventional method. This approach would be useful for accurate estimation of individual outcomes of EOC patients. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6543110/ /pubmed/31074247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e65 Text en Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Paik, E Sun Lee, Jeong-Won Park, Jeong-Yeol Kim, Ju-Hyun Kim, Mijung Kim, Tae-Joong Choi, Chel Hun Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk-Soo Seo, Sung Wook Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods |
title | Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods |
title_full | Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods |
title_fullStr | Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods |
title_short | Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods |
title_sort | prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31074247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paikesun predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT leejeongwon predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT parkjeongyeol predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT kimjuhyun predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT kimmijung predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT kimtaejoong predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT choichelhun predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT kimbyounggie predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT baeduksoo predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods AT seosungwook predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods |