Cargando…

Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new prognostic classification for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using gradient boosting (GB) and to compare the accuracy of the prognostic model with the conventional statistical method. METHODS: Information of EOC patients from Samsung M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paik, E Sun, Lee, Jeong-Won, Park, Jeong-Yeol, Kim, Ju-Hyun, Kim, Mijung, Kim, Tae-Joong, Choi, Chel Hun, Kim, Byoung-Gie, Bae, Duk-Soo, Seo, Sung Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31074247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e65
_version_ 1783423039029903360
author Paik, E Sun
Lee, Jeong-Won
Park, Jeong-Yeol
Kim, Ju-Hyun
Kim, Mijung
Kim, Tae-Joong
Choi, Chel Hun
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk-Soo
Seo, Sung Wook
author_facet Paik, E Sun
Lee, Jeong-Won
Park, Jeong-Yeol
Kim, Ju-Hyun
Kim, Mijung
Kim, Tae-Joong
Choi, Chel Hun
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk-Soo
Seo, Sung Wook
author_sort Paik, E Sun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new prognostic classification for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using gradient boosting (GB) and to compare the accuracy of the prognostic model with the conventional statistical method. METHODS: Information of EOC patients from Samsung Medical Center (training cohort, n=1,128) was analyzed to optimize the prognostic model using GB. The performance of the final model was externally validated with patient information from Asan Medical Center (validation cohort, n=229). The area under the curve (AUC) by the GB model was compared to that of the conventional Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (CoxPHR) model. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the AUC of the GB model for predicting second year overall survival (OS), with the highest target value, was 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.802–0.853). In the validation cohort, the GB model also showed high AUC of 0.843 (95% CI=0.833–0.853). In comparison, the conventional CoxPHR method showed lower AUC (0.668 (95% CI=0.617–0.719) for the training cohort and 0.597 (95% CI=0.474–0.719) for the validation cohort) compared to GB. New classification according to survival probability scores of the GB model identified four distinct prognostic subgroups that showed more discriminately classified prediction than the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. CONCLUSION: Our novel GB-guided classification accurately identified the prognostic subgroups of patients with EOC and showed higher accuracy than the conventional method. This approach would be useful for accurate estimation of individual outcomes of EOC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6543110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65431102019-07-01 Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods Paik, E Sun Lee, Jeong-Won Park, Jeong-Yeol Kim, Ju-Hyun Kim, Mijung Kim, Tae-Joong Choi, Chel Hun Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk-Soo Seo, Sung Wook J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new prognostic classification for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using gradient boosting (GB) and to compare the accuracy of the prognostic model with the conventional statistical method. METHODS: Information of EOC patients from Samsung Medical Center (training cohort, n=1,128) was analyzed to optimize the prognostic model using GB. The performance of the final model was externally validated with patient information from Asan Medical Center (validation cohort, n=229). The area under the curve (AUC) by the GB model was compared to that of the conventional Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (CoxPHR) model. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the AUC of the GB model for predicting second year overall survival (OS), with the highest target value, was 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.802–0.853). In the validation cohort, the GB model also showed high AUC of 0.843 (95% CI=0.833–0.853). In comparison, the conventional CoxPHR method showed lower AUC (0.668 (95% CI=0.617–0.719) for the training cohort and 0.597 (95% CI=0.474–0.719) for the validation cohort) compared to GB. New classification according to survival probability scores of the GB model identified four distinct prognostic subgroups that showed more discriminately classified prediction than the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. CONCLUSION: Our novel GB-guided classification accurately identified the prognostic subgroups of patients with EOC and showed higher accuracy than the conventional method. This approach would be useful for accurate estimation of individual outcomes of EOC patients. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6543110/ /pubmed/31074247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e65 Text en Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Paik, E Sun
Lee, Jeong-Won
Park, Jeong-Yeol
Kim, Ju-Hyun
Kim, Mijung
Kim, Tae-Joong
Choi, Chel Hun
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk-Soo
Seo, Sung Wook
Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
title Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
title_full Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
title_fullStr Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
title_short Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
title_sort prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31074247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e65
work_keys_str_mv AT paikesun predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT leejeongwon predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT parkjeongyeol predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT kimjuhyun predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT kimmijung predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT kimtaejoong predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT choichelhun predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT kimbyounggie predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT baeduksoo predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods
AT seosungwook predictionofsurvivaloutcomesinpatientswithepithelialovariancancerusingmachinelearningmethods