Cargando…

Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities

BACKGROUND: Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, James D., Auerbach, Andrew D., Anderson, Wendy, Fagan, Maureen, Carnie, Martha, Hanson, Catherine, Banta, Jim, Symczak, Gina, Robinson, Edmondo, Schnipper, Jeffrey, Wong, Celene, Weiss, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12873
_version_ 1783423050747740160
author Harrison, James D.
Auerbach, Andrew D.
Anderson, Wendy
Fagan, Maureen
Carnie, Martha
Hanson, Catherine
Banta, Jim
Symczak, Gina
Robinson, Edmondo
Schnipper, Jeffrey
Wong, Celene
Weiss, Rachel
author_facet Harrison, James D.
Auerbach, Andrew D.
Anderson, Wendy
Fagan, Maureen
Carnie, Martha
Hanson, Catherine
Banta, Jim
Symczak, Gina
Robinson, Edmondo
Schnipper, Jeffrey
Wong, Celene
Weiss, Rachel
author_sort Harrison, James D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have been published to guide these efforts. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this narrative review are to identify, quantify and summarize (a) the conceptual foundational principles of patient stakeholder engagement in research and (b) best practice activities to support these efforts. SEARCH STRATEGY, INCLUSION CRITERIA, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We accessed a publicly available repository of systematically identified literature related to patient engagement in research. Two reviewers independently screened articles to identify relevant articles and abstracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 990 potentially relevant articles of which 935 (94.4%) were excluded and 55 (5.6%) relevant. The most commonly reported foundational principles were “respect” (n = 25, 45%) and “equitable power between all team members” (n = 21, 38%). Creating “trust between patient stakeholders and researchers” was described in 17 (31%) articles. Twenty‐seven (49%) articles emphasized the importance of providing training and education for both patient stakeholder and researchers. Providing financial compensation for patient stakeholders’ time and expertise was noted in 19 (35%) articles. Twenty articles (36%) emphasized regular, bidirectional dialogue between patient partners and researchers as important for successful engagement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Engaging patient stakeholders in research as partners presents an opportunity to design, implement and disseminate patient‐centred research. This review creates an overarching foundational framework for authentic and sustainable partnerships between patient stakeholders and researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6543160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65431602019-06-04 Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities Harrison, James D. Auerbach, Andrew D. Anderson, Wendy Fagan, Maureen Carnie, Martha Hanson, Catherine Banta, Jim Symczak, Gina Robinson, Edmondo Schnipper, Jeffrey Wong, Celene Weiss, Rachel Health Expect Review Articles BACKGROUND: Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have been published to guide these efforts. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this narrative review are to identify, quantify and summarize (a) the conceptual foundational principles of patient stakeholder engagement in research and (b) best practice activities to support these efforts. SEARCH STRATEGY, INCLUSION CRITERIA, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We accessed a publicly available repository of systematically identified literature related to patient engagement in research. Two reviewers independently screened articles to identify relevant articles and abstracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 990 potentially relevant articles of which 935 (94.4%) were excluded and 55 (5.6%) relevant. The most commonly reported foundational principles were “respect” (n = 25, 45%) and “equitable power between all team members” (n = 21, 38%). Creating “trust between patient stakeholders and researchers” was described in 17 (31%) articles. Twenty‐seven (49%) articles emphasized the importance of providing training and education for both patient stakeholder and researchers. Providing financial compensation for patient stakeholders’ time and expertise was noted in 19 (35%) articles. Twenty articles (36%) emphasized regular, bidirectional dialogue between patient partners and researchers as important for successful engagement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Engaging patient stakeholders in research as partners presents an opportunity to design, implement and disseminate patient‐centred research. This review creates an overarching foundational framework for authentic and sustainable partnerships between patient stakeholders and researchers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-13 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6543160/ /pubmed/30761699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12873 Text en © 2019 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Harrison, James D.
Auerbach, Andrew D.
Anderson, Wendy
Fagan, Maureen
Carnie, Martha
Hanson, Catherine
Banta, Jim
Symczak, Gina
Robinson, Edmondo
Schnipper, Jeffrey
Wong, Celene
Weiss, Rachel
Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
title Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
title_full Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
title_fullStr Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
title_full_unstemmed Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
title_short Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
title_sort patient stakeholder engagement in research: a narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12873
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonjamesd patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT auerbachandrewd patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT andersonwendy patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT faganmaureen patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT carniemartha patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT hansoncatherine patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT bantajim patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT symczakgina patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT robinsonedmondo patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT schnipperjeffrey patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT wongcelene patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities
AT weissrachel patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities