Cargando…
Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
BACKGROUND: Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12873 |
_version_ | 1783423050747740160 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, James D. Auerbach, Andrew D. Anderson, Wendy Fagan, Maureen Carnie, Martha Hanson, Catherine Banta, Jim Symczak, Gina Robinson, Edmondo Schnipper, Jeffrey Wong, Celene Weiss, Rachel |
author_facet | Harrison, James D. Auerbach, Andrew D. Anderson, Wendy Fagan, Maureen Carnie, Martha Hanson, Catherine Banta, Jim Symczak, Gina Robinson, Edmondo Schnipper, Jeffrey Wong, Celene Weiss, Rachel |
author_sort | Harrison, James D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have been published to guide these efforts. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this narrative review are to identify, quantify and summarize (a) the conceptual foundational principles of patient stakeholder engagement in research and (b) best practice activities to support these efforts. SEARCH STRATEGY, INCLUSION CRITERIA, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We accessed a publicly available repository of systematically identified literature related to patient engagement in research. Two reviewers independently screened articles to identify relevant articles and abstracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 990 potentially relevant articles of which 935 (94.4%) were excluded and 55 (5.6%) relevant. The most commonly reported foundational principles were “respect” (n = 25, 45%) and “equitable power between all team members” (n = 21, 38%). Creating “trust between patient stakeholders and researchers” was described in 17 (31%) articles. Twenty‐seven (49%) articles emphasized the importance of providing training and education for both patient stakeholder and researchers. Providing financial compensation for patient stakeholders’ time and expertise was noted in 19 (35%) articles. Twenty articles (36%) emphasized regular, bidirectional dialogue between patient partners and researchers as important for successful engagement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Engaging patient stakeholders in research as partners presents an opportunity to design, implement and disseminate patient‐centred research. This review creates an overarching foundational framework for authentic and sustainable partnerships between patient stakeholders and researchers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6543160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65431602019-06-04 Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities Harrison, James D. Auerbach, Andrew D. Anderson, Wendy Fagan, Maureen Carnie, Martha Hanson, Catherine Banta, Jim Symczak, Gina Robinson, Edmondo Schnipper, Jeffrey Wong, Celene Weiss, Rachel Health Expect Review Articles BACKGROUND: Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have been published to guide these efforts. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this narrative review are to identify, quantify and summarize (a) the conceptual foundational principles of patient stakeholder engagement in research and (b) best practice activities to support these efforts. SEARCH STRATEGY, INCLUSION CRITERIA, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We accessed a publicly available repository of systematically identified literature related to patient engagement in research. Two reviewers independently screened articles to identify relevant articles and abstracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 990 potentially relevant articles of which 935 (94.4%) were excluded and 55 (5.6%) relevant. The most commonly reported foundational principles were “respect” (n = 25, 45%) and “equitable power between all team members” (n = 21, 38%). Creating “trust between patient stakeholders and researchers” was described in 17 (31%) articles. Twenty‐seven (49%) articles emphasized the importance of providing training and education for both patient stakeholder and researchers. Providing financial compensation for patient stakeholders’ time and expertise was noted in 19 (35%) articles. Twenty articles (36%) emphasized regular, bidirectional dialogue between patient partners and researchers as important for successful engagement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Engaging patient stakeholders in research as partners presents an opportunity to design, implement and disseminate patient‐centred research. This review creates an overarching foundational framework for authentic and sustainable partnerships between patient stakeholders and researchers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-13 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6543160/ /pubmed/30761699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12873 Text en © 2019 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Harrison, James D. Auerbach, Andrew D. Anderson, Wendy Fagan, Maureen Carnie, Martha Hanson, Catherine Banta, Jim Symczak, Gina Robinson, Edmondo Schnipper, Jeffrey Wong, Celene Weiss, Rachel Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities |
title | Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities |
title_full | Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities |
title_fullStr | Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities |
title_short | Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities |
title_sort | patient stakeholder engagement in research: a narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisonjamesd patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT auerbachandrewd patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT andersonwendy patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT faganmaureen patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT carniemartha patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT hansoncatherine patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT bantajim patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT symczakgina patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT robinsonedmondo patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT schnipperjeffrey patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT wongcelene patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities AT weissrachel patientstakeholderengagementinresearchanarrativereviewtodescribefoundationalprinciplesandbestpracticeactivities |