Cargando…

REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively gained acceptance as the standard of care for acute appendicitis. Focusing on the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after a laparoscopic appendectomy, discordant data have been reported ranging from 1.5 to 20%. Besides, evidenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cioffi, Stefano Piero Bernardo, Altomare, Michele, Spota, Andrea, Granieri, Stefano, Cimbanassi, Stefania, Chiara, Osvaldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0243-4
_version_ 1783423117215924224
author Cioffi, Stefano Piero Bernardo
Altomare, Michele
Spota, Andrea
Granieri, Stefano
Cimbanassi, Stefania
Chiara, Osvaldo
author_facet Cioffi, Stefano Piero Bernardo
Altomare, Michele
Spota, Andrea
Granieri, Stefano
Cimbanassi, Stefania
Chiara, Osvaldo
author_sort Cioffi, Stefano Piero Bernardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively gained acceptance as the standard of care for acute appendicitis. Focusing on the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after a laparoscopic appendectomy, discordant data have been reported ranging from 1.5 to 20%. Besides, evidence advocating advantages from peritoneal irrigation over suction only are lacking. Most studies are burdened by a high level of heterogeneity regarding the severity of the appendicitis and modalities of peritoneal irrigation. One of the main drawbacks is the lack of an accepted classification for different degrees of appendicitis and peritoneal contamination. The aim of the study is to introduce a classification to clarify the relationship between grade of appendicitis, contamination, and postoperative incidence of IAA considering the surgeon’s attitude toward irrigation or suction alone. Preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative predictive factors for infectious complication will also be assessed. This study is meant to be the first Italian multicenter resident-based observational study. METHODS: Patients suffering from acute appendicitis will be enrolled during a 1-year period, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will fill an online form reporting all clinical and intra-operative data of each patient undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy. General surgery residents will be responsible for data collection. Our proposal of classification is based on the histological grade of appendicitis and intra-operative degree of peritoneal contamination. For each grade, a progressively increasing score is assigned. DISCUSSION: The observational nature of this study is mandatory to examine surgeons’ attitude toward peritoneal contamination during laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis. Identification of different severity grades of acute appendicitis and their relationship with the development of postoperative abscesses is necessary. The resulting classification and score, even considering peritoneal lavage or suction alone, will define risk classes of peri-appendiceal contamination each one related to a specific incidence rate of postoperative IAA. Nowadays, maximum effort should be made to reach the best procedural standardization and surgical decision-making should be supported by solid evidence, especially in an emergency surgery setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6543631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65436312019-06-04 REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system Cioffi, Stefano Piero Bernardo Altomare, Michele Spota, Andrea Granieri, Stefano Cimbanassi, Stefania Chiara, Osvaldo World J Emerg Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively gained acceptance as the standard of care for acute appendicitis. Focusing on the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after a laparoscopic appendectomy, discordant data have been reported ranging from 1.5 to 20%. Besides, evidence advocating advantages from peritoneal irrigation over suction only are lacking. Most studies are burdened by a high level of heterogeneity regarding the severity of the appendicitis and modalities of peritoneal irrigation. One of the main drawbacks is the lack of an accepted classification for different degrees of appendicitis and peritoneal contamination. The aim of the study is to introduce a classification to clarify the relationship between grade of appendicitis, contamination, and postoperative incidence of IAA considering the surgeon’s attitude toward irrigation or suction alone. Preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative predictive factors for infectious complication will also be assessed. This study is meant to be the first Italian multicenter resident-based observational study. METHODS: Patients suffering from acute appendicitis will be enrolled during a 1-year period, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will fill an online form reporting all clinical and intra-operative data of each patient undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy. General surgery residents will be responsible for data collection. Our proposal of classification is based on the histological grade of appendicitis and intra-operative degree of peritoneal contamination. For each grade, a progressively increasing score is assigned. DISCUSSION: The observational nature of this study is mandatory to examine surgeons’ attitude toward peritoneal contamination during laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis. Identification of different severity grades of acute appendicitis and their relationship with the development of postoperative abscesses is necessary. The resulting classification and score, even considering peritoneal lavage or suction alone, will define risk classes of peri-appendiceal contamination each one related to a specific incidence rate of postoperative IAA. Nowadays, maximum effort should be made to reach the best procedural standardization and surgical decision-making should be supported by solid evidence, especially in an emergency surgery setting. BioMed Central 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6543631/ /pubmed/31164914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0243-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cioffi, Stefano Piero Bernardo
Altomare, Michele
Spota, Andrea
Granieri, Stefano
Cimbanassi, Stefania
Chiara, Osvaldo
REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system
title REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system
title_full REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system
title_fullStr REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system
title_full_unstemmed REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system
title_short REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system
title_sort resident 1 (re-assessment of appendicitis evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: do we end a non-standardized treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy—does the grade of contamination matter? a prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0243-4
work_keys_str_mv AT cioffistefanopierobernardo resident1reassessmentofappendicitisevaluationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoweendanonstandardizedtreatmentapproachandhabitperitonealirrigationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoesthegradeofcontaminationmatteraprospectivemulticenterresidentbasedevaluationofa
AT altomaremichele resident1reassessmentofappendicitisevaluationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoweendanonstandardizedtreatmentapproachandhabitperitonealirrigationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoesthegradeofcontaminationmatteraprospectivemulticenterresidentbasedevaluationofa
AT spotaandrea resident1reassessmentofappendicitisevaluationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoweendanonstandardizedtreatmentapproachandhabitperitonealirrigationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoesthegradeofcontaminationmatteraprospectivemulticenterresidentbasedevaluationofa
AT granieristefano resident1reassessmentofappendicitisevaluationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoweendanonstandardizedtreatmentapproachandhabitperitonealirrigationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoesthegradeofcontaminationmatteraprospectivemulticenterresidentbasedevaluationofa
AT cimbanassistefania resident1reassessmentofappendicitisevaluationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoweendanonstandardizedtreatmentapproachandhabitperitonealirrigationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoesthegradeofcontaminationmatteraprospectivemulticenterresidentbasedevaluationofa
AT chiaraosvaldo resident1reassessmentofappendicitisevaluationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoweendanonstandardizedtreatmentapproachandhabitperitonealirrigationduringlaparoscopicappendectomydoesthegradeofcontaminationmatteraprospectivemulticenterresidentbasedevaluationofa